Cinemorphosis

Blog

  • Ozempification and the Death of the Inner Architect

    Ozempification and the Death of the Inner Architect

    Let’s start with this uncomfortable truth: you’re living through a civilization-level rebrand.

    Your world is being reshaped—not gradually, but violently, by algorithms and digital prosthetics designed to make your life easier, faster, smoother… and emptier. The disruption didn’t knock politely. It kicked the damn door in. And now, whether you realize it or not, you’re standing in the debris, trying to figure out what part of your life still belongs to you.

    Take your education. Once upon a time, college was where minds were forged—through long nights, terrible drafts, humiliating feedback, and the occasional breakthrough that made it all worth it. Today? Let’s be honest. Higher ed is starting to look like an AI-driven Mad Libs exercise.

    Some of you are already doing it: you plug in a prompt, paste the results, and hit submit. What you turn in is technically fine—spelled correctly, structurally intact, coherent enough to pass. And your professors? We’re grading these Franken-essays on caffeine and resignation, knowing full well that originality has been replaced by passable mimicry.

    And it’s not just school. Out in the so-called “real world,” companies are churning out bloated, tone-deaf AI memos—soulless prose that reads like it was written by a robot with performance anxiety. Streaming services are pumping out shows written by predictive text. Whole industries are feeding you content that’s technically correct but spiritually dead.

    You are surrounded by polished mediocrity.

    But wait, we’re not just outsourcing our minds—we’re outsourcing our bodies, too. GLP-1 drugs like Ozempic are reshaping what it means to be “disciplined.” No more calorie counting. No more gym humiliation. You don’t change your habits. You inject your progress.

    So what does that make you? You’re becoming someone new: someone we might call Ozempified. A user, not a builder. A reactor, not a responder. A person who runs on borrowed intelligence and pharmaceutical willpower. And it works. You’ll be thinner. You’ll be productive. You’ll even succeed—on paper.

    But not as a human being.

    You risk becoming what the gaming world calls a Non-Player Character (NPC)—a background figure, a functionary, a placeholder in your own life. You’ll do your job. You’ll attend your Zoom meetings. You’ll fill out your forms and tap your apps and check your likes. But you won’t have agency. You won’t have fingerprints on anything real.

    You’ll be living on autopilot, inside someone else’s system.

    So here’s the choice—and yes, it is a choice: You can be an NPC. Or you can be an Architect.

    The Architect doesn’t react. The Architect designs. They choose discomfort over sedation. They delay gratification. They don’t look for applause—they build systems that outlast feelings, trends, and cheap dopamine tricks.

    Where others scroll, the Architect shapes.
    Where others echo, they invent.
    Where others obey prompts, they write the code.

    Their values aren’t crowdsourced. Their discipline isn’t random. It’s engineered. They are not ruled by algorithm or panic. Their satisfaction comes not from feedback loops, but from the knowledge that they are building something only they could build.

    So yes, this class will ask more of you than typing a prompt and letting the machine do the rest. It will demand thought, effort, revision, frustration, clarity, and eventually—agency.

    Because in the age of Ozempification, becoming an Architect isn’t a flex—it’s a survival strategy.

    There is no salvation in a life run on autopilot.

    You’re here. So start building.

  • Boots, Pie, and Nostalgia: Dispatch from Mortimer Farms

    Boots, Pie, and Nostalgia: Dispatch from Mortimer Farms

    Last night we time-traveled to a Norman Rockwell fever dream: a retro barn dance at Mortimer Farms in Dewey-Humboldt, Arizona, where about 500 people—sunburned, denim-clad, and wholly unironically patriotic—gathered to eat, dance, and mainline nostalgia.

    The soundtrack? A whiplash blend of twangy country and 70s rock that made you want to two-step and tailgate at the same time. Dinner was an unapologetic heartland spread: cheeseburgers grilled to smoky perfection, heirloom salad straight from the farm, and homemade blueberry and apple pies so rustic they practically came with a grandmother.

    As I looked around—kids doing cartwheels in the dust, old men tapping their boots in rhythm, teenagers pretending not to enjoy themselves—I realized I hadn’t tasted this much deep-fried Americana since trick-or-treating in San Jose in 1967, pillowcase in hand, chasing sugar highs under suburban streetlights.

    So yes, we took a family portrait. Not just to capture the night, but to memorialize the moment we voluntarily stepped into a live-action postcard, brazen nostalgia and all.

  • When It comes to Swim Briefs the Size of a Hotel Mint, Maybe Opt Out

    When It comes to Swim Briefs the Size of a Hotel Mint, Maybe Opt Out

    Today’s New York Times article, titled “Skimpy Men’s Swimming Briefs Are Making a Splash,” offers a solemn dispatch from the front lines of GLP-1 drugs, but I would guess that men—having exhausted every form of visible self-optimization—are now expressing their Ozempic-enabled slenderness via tiny, Lycra-clad declarations of status. We’re talking male bikinis, or what I like to call the ego sling.

    Apparently, if you’re dropping $18,000 a year to chemically suppress your appetite and shed your humanity one subcutaneous injection at a time, you deserve the privilege of looking like a Bond villain’s pool boy. I suppose this is the endgame: pay to waste away, then wrap what’s left in a luxury logoed banana peel.

    Luxury houses, never ones to miss a chance to monetize body dysmorphia, are now marketing these second-skin briefs not as mere swimwear, but as power statements. To wear them is to say: “I’ve defeated fat, joy, modesty, and comfort in one fell swoop.”

    I’m almost 64. My aspirations remain high—ideally, I’d like to look like a special-ops operator on vacation in Sardinia. But I know my place. I wear boxer-style swim trunks, the cloth of the pragmatic and the semi-dignified. They’re not exciting, but neither is seeing a sun-leathered septuagenarian adjust a spandex slingshot over a suspicious tan line.

    There’s a difference between being aspirational and being delusional. The former means striving for vitality, strength, and energy. The latter means stuffing yourself into a satirical undergarment and pretending you’re 28 with a sponsorship deal.

    To my fellow older men: sculpt your body like it’s your spiritual obligation—but when it comes to swim briefs the size of a hotel mint, maybe opt out. Not every part of youth is worth reliving. Some of it deserves to be left in the chlorine-stained past, right next to Axe body spray and Ed Hardy tank tops.

  • Post-Vacation Penance: A Dietary Manifesto in Four Meals

    Post-Vacation Penance: A Dietary Manifesto in Four Meals

    There’s something bleakly comical about spiraling into despair on vacation—the kind that sets in when you’re no longer tethered to your sacred rituals of productivity, restraint, and the sweet, tight belt of routine. Out here, in this plush exile of self-indulgence, I’ve become a man who stares into a plate of hotel hash browns and thinks, This ends when I get home.

    And so, to soothe the spiritual rot that sets in after too many mornings without my normal suffering, I’ve started building a plan—a post-vacation austerity program disguised as wellness.

    First, the coffee. I will reclaim my morning dignity with the $89 Ninja 12-cup glass carafe coffee maker. No plastic pod disgrace. I will grind dark roast beans with the solemnity of a monk at matins, using my burr grinder like a weapon forged for righteousness.

    Breakfast will not be an act of contrition but one of redemption: buckwheat groats or steel-cut oats, topped with protein powder, berries, walnuts, and chia seeds—like an edible TED Talk on anti-inflammation.

    Lunch will be a spartan affair: arugula so bitter it judges you, and tofu braised until it forgets it was once bland. Dressing? A holy trinity of balsamic vinegar, spicy mustard, and nutritional yeast. This is not food—it’s penance with flavor.

    Afternoon snack? Greek yogurt, protein powder, and berries. The combination is reliable, unexciting, and doctrinally correct.

    Dinner is where things get unhinged in a good way. I will reach for my Le Creuset Dutch oven (color: colonial blue, attitude: smug) and conjure quinoa with zucchini, fire-roasted tomatoes, nutritional yeast, and a whisper of coconut milk. I will mix in braised tofu until the pan hisses in agreement.

    And yes, there will be protein pancakes, crafted from oats, baking powder, protein powder, eggs (or applesauce, if I’m feeling woke), yogurt, cinnamon, honey, chia seeds, and vanilla extract. The batter will feel like spackle. The result will feel like victory.

    Exercise? Four days of kettlebells instead of five—because joints are finite, and ego is not a medical plan. On my “off” days, I’ll alternate between the exercise bike and power-flow yoga, both of which will mock me in their own way.

    Diet soda? Dead to me. I’ve seen what happens when it wins: a family friend guzzles it by the gallon, her health circling the drain like a cautionary fable. I will swap it out for sparkling water and the moral superiority it confers.

    This is not about orthorexia or self-hate disguised as wellness. This is about escaping confusion, that modern affliction where “healthy” means both everything and nothing. I will eat four times a day. I will consume 160 grams of protein. I will not exceed 2,400 calories. I will fight entropy with routine, bloat with balance, and preserve the image of myself I still—somehow—believe is possible.

  • The Manuscript Awakens: A Dugout Vision from the Collective Unconscious

    The Manuscript Awakens: A Dugout Vision from the Collective Unconscious

    Last night I dreamed I was striding across a wind-blown grassy knoll, the kind of landscape that smells faintly of unresolved ambitions and freshly cut ego. Out of nowhere—because where else do these things happen?—a panel of vaguely official-looking figures appeared, cloaked in bureaucratic smugness, and awarded me the managerial reins of a baseball team unlike any other: it was helmed, inexplicably yet inevitably, by Leonardo DiCaprio.

    Yes, that DiCaprio—Oscar-winner, yacht philosopher, professional man-child. He looked fantastic in cleats.

    Suddenly, the gentle slope of the grassy knoll rippled like a stage set being pulled away, and in its place emerged a full-fledged baseball diamond, etched into the earth as if by divine groundskeepers. The green gave way to precisely mowed outfield grass, bordered by crisp white chalk lines that glowed with supernatural brightness. Dugouts pushed up from the soil like subterranean bunkers, complete with splintered benches and battered Gatorade coolers. Bleachers unfolded in rows, metallic and sun-bleached, teeming with phantom spectators whose shadows twitched in anticipation. The air smelled of dust, pine tar, and something mythic.

    As I issued cryptic signals from a dugout made of dark oak and existential dread, DiCaprio tore around the bases with uncanny precision. But this wasn’t just sport. Oh no. With every base he stole, something stirred beneath the soil. From the Earth, like some hallucinatory literary harvest, lost manuscripts erupted like weeds on speed—scrolls, journals, forgotten novels. Some of them were mine, written decades ago in youthful fits of desperation and pretension. But they were no longer mine. They belonged to the collective unconscious, that vast psychic compost heap where dead dreams go to reincarnate as New York Times bestsellers or cult manifestos.

    As DiCaprio sprinted toward third, the text of the manuscripts began rewriting themselves, transforming into the ideological scripture of a new world order dictated by stolen bases and film star footwork.

    Enter Lanai, a high school friend I hadn’t seen since dial-up internet. She appeared on the dugout steps like a ghost of poor choices past and announced that she had reformed her life through the Quincy Jones Art Club, a kind of gospel-jazz cult devoted to self-mastery, syncopation, and the sacred key of B-flat minor.

    “You should join,” she said, her eyes glowing with the fervor of someone who had clearly renounced sugar, sarcasm, and casual sex.

    “I might,” I lied, “but I’m managing DiCaprio right now and the stakes are cosmically high.”

    Before she could argue, Quincy Jones himself descended like an archangel in a powder-blue zoot suit, easily seven feet tall, smelling faintly of vinyl records, Chanel Bleu, and omniscience. He shook my hand. Electricity pulsed through my forearm. His voice—equal parts gravel, genius, and benevolent threat—delivered a sermon about his artistic path: discipline, vision, excellence.

    I tried to listen. Truly. But my attention was being hijacked by the spectacle on the field: DiCaprio sliding into home as epic sentences unfurled from the ground like flaming banners, edited in real-time by forces unseen. The crowd roared, their faces blurred like a dream I was about to forget.

    And through it all, I wondered: Was I the manager, or just another rewriter of forgotten dreams?

  • The Last Tick: Breaking Up with My Watch Addiction

    The Last Tick: Breaking Up with My Watch Addiction

    Chapter 7 from The Timepiece Whisperer

    It struck me as odd—how unmoved I was by the Watch Master’s death. No sadness, no shock. Just a dry acceptance, like hearing the mail didn’t arrive. The man was in his late seventies, had chain-smoked his way through the golden age of studio recording, and looked like he’d been exhaling Marlboro ghosts for decades. Of course he died. It was inevitable, like quartz battery failure.

    And yet… I felt I should have felt more. But I was too deep in my own wrist-bound psychodrama. I wasn’t mourning a mentor—I was clawing for freedom from the slow, obsessive spiral of watch addiction. The Watch Master had passed the baton, and in his place stood a new sherpa on my horological hell-hike: Josh, the so-called Timepiece Whisperer.

    The next evening, Josh opened the door with a look that said get ready to be offended gently.

    “Bad news,” he said.

    I followed him into the kitchen. Same table. Same tension. He poured me a mug of mint tea, then hit me with it:

    “You want to add the Seiko Astron. I’ve thought about it. The answer is no. Absolutely not. You’re done. No more watches. Not now, not ever.”

    I blinked. “That’s… a bit harsh.”

    Josh didn’t blink. “It’s the truth. One more blue-dial beauty will not complete your collection—it’ll fracture it. You don’t wear formalwear. You don’t attend black-tie galas. That Astron won’t elevate your life—it’ll mock it. You’ll feel guilty for not wearing your other watches, they’ll collect dust and resentment, and you’ll spiral again. The result? Misery.”

    I looked at the floor. I already knew this. I’d said the same things to myself, in a dozen internal arguments that always ended with but maybe just one more…

    “You needed to hear it from someone else,” Josh said.

    “I hate myself for being so weak. I should have handled this alone.”

    He shrugged. “That’s what I’m here for. Left to your own devices, you’d still be googling ‘best summer watches for men over 60.’ I saved you a year of torment in two days. You’re welcome.”

    Then he pulled out a sugar cube shaped like a butterfly—absurdly whimsical for such a hardline intervention—and dropped it into my tea.

    “Close your eyes. Make a wish. Drink it down.”

    I did as instructed. The mint tea was scalding and sweet.

    He asked, “What did you wish for?”

    “That I be free from this watch-collecting hellhole and never go back.”

    He nodded. “Excellent wish.”

    I never saw Josh again.
    And I never bought another watch.

  • Vacation Nihilism: The Existential Price of That $28 Margarita

    Vacation Nihilism: The Existential Price of That $28 Margarita

    Vacation nihilism is the uniquely modern despair that creeps in when you’re supposed to be relaxing. You’re sprawled on a rental bed, digesting overpriced novelty food, staring at the ceiling fan, and asking yourself: What am I even doing with my life? The break from your daily routine doesn’t recharge you—it exposes you. With your rituals on hold, your ambitions start to look ridiculous, your projects meaningless, and your belief in humanity’s forward march into reason and tech-fueled glory? Laughable.

    You’re not wrong, entirely. The world has gone a bit mad. But your despair isn’t just philosophical—it’s biochemical. You’ve sabotaged your sleep schedule. You’ve eaten five experimental meals in three days and haven’t seen a vegetable since the airport salad bar. Your gut is staging a coup. You’re bloated, irritable, and haven’t had ten consecutive minutes alone since the trip began. Naturally, you begin to suspect your entire existence is a long-running joke with no punchline.

    Then comes the knock: Nihilism, that smug little parasite, invites himself in. And you’re too tired to fight him off. He plops down beside you and begins dismantling your life, piece by piece: your goals, your routines, your little morning affirmations—all reduced to performance art for an indifferent universe.

    For most people, this existential fog lifts after a few days back in the saddle. The routine reboots. Coffee tastes like salvation again. But not always. Sometimes you bring it back with you, like a psychological bedbug infestation. Tiny, persistent thoughts that burrow into your habits. Questions you can’t un-ask. You might look the same on the outside, but internally, the scaffolding is rusting.

    You went on vacation to unwind. Instead, you came back with nihilism spores. And no, TSA does not screen for them.

  • Goodbye, Sedona: A Town That Priced Out Its Soul

    Goodbye, Sedona: A Town That Priced Out Its Soul

    Sedona served me one final contrast in my short stay: banana protein pancakes that flirted with greatness at Wildcraft Kitchen, followed by a dinner at the hotel restaurant so bland it felt like punishment for having taste buds. Downtown reminded me of Mammoth—if Mammoth got a chakra alignment and started microdosing moonlight. It was pleasant enough, sure, but I won’t be back. The energy is a little too “manifest your soulmate through sound bowl therapy” for me. I can only dodge so many crystal shops before I start craving asphalt and cynicism.

    This morning, around 7 a.m., I picked up breakfast burritos and coffee from a quiet Mexican restaurant while my family slept off their kombucha hangover. The owner, cheerful despite the early hour, struck up a conversation while assembling the food. She confided that business was in the gutter—record lows, in fact. Politics, she said. Canadians—once reliable, cheerful spenders—have stopped coming. Apparently, the local talk of making them our 51st state didn’t go over well. Imagine that.

    She told me she can’t even afford to live in Sedona anymore, despite running a business there. Rents are out of reach, so she commutes 17 miles each way to serve overpriced burritos to tourists on spiritual quests.

    Sure, a few celebrities still parachute in, revving up their Lamborghinis and flaunting their bored wealth. But the town’s energy has thinned. The quartz glows less brightly. The chakra vortex feels like it’s in foreclosure. And I, for one, won’t be adding Sedona to my “must-return” list anytime soon.

  • Prescott Grit vs. Sedona Glow: Notes from a Wellness Warzone

    Prescott Grit vs. Sedona Glow: Notes from a Wellness Warzone

    Day 3 in Prescott, and my family’s packing up the Accord and heading southeast toward Sedona—a town where even the air seems micro-filtered and infused with healing intentions. We’re leaving behind the dusty frontier cosplay of Prescott for a place where every barista moonlights as a Reiki healer and people pay $25 for smoothies made with powdered enlightenment, ashwagandha, and something called “brain dust.”

    This is what passes for a vacation vibe shift: from antique shops and elk jerky to chakra tuning and cactus-laced kombucha. Sedona isn’t just a town—it’s a wellness compound disguised as a zip code. Everyone’s here for a spiritual oil change, a digestive reboot, or to realign their third eye after burning out from too many Zoom meetings.

    Somewhere between the red rocks and the overpriced adaptogens, I’ve started drafting a post-vacation manifesto—call it my personal wellness lite protocol:

    • Eat 2,200 calories a day, divided into three 600-calorie meals and one 400-calorie snack, because structure gives my chaos purpose.
    • Cut my kettlebell workouts to four days a week, swap in some power yoga and stationary bike rides, and try not to feel like I’m betraying my inner Viking.
    • Eat more plants, limit fish to three days a week, and resist the call of animal fat whispering to me like a siren from a deep fryer.
    • Don’t buy a $1,000 recliner, no matter how luxurious, because it reeks of surrender—a velvet-lined sarcophagus for a man easing into obsolescence.
    • Try being a nice guy, because cynicism is easy and kindness might be the only true detox.

    That’s about all the spiritual bandwidth I’ve got. Enlightenment on a budget. Grace in four-day installments. Wellness with a sarcastic aftertaste.

  • Viral Nations: How Pandemic Cinema Reflects a World (a College Essay Prompt)

    Viral Nations: How Pandemic Cinema Reflects a World (a College Essay Prompt)

    Both 28 Years Later and World War Z depict the spread of a deadly virus that triggers the collapse of global order. Yet beyond the zombies and infected hordes, these films offer striking metaphors for the chaos, distrust, and political polarization amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic.

    In a well-structured, thesis-driven essay of 1,700 words, compare how each film explores the fragility of major institutions (governments, media, military, science), the spread of misinformation, and the psychological aftermath of global catastrophe. Your analysis should consider how each film allegorizes different aspects of pandemic culture: emotional volatility in 28 Years Later vs. bureaucratic inertia in World War Z.

    You must address the following questions:

    1. How do these films portray public institutions’ response to crisis? What critiques are embedded in those portrayals?
    2. In what ways do these narratives reflect or exaggerate the real-world cultural and political divisions that were intensified by COVID-19?
    3. Do these films offer any hope or solutions, or are they fundamentally cynical about humanity’s ability to cooperate?

    Use specific scenes, dialogue, and cinematic techniques from both films to support your claims. Outside sources are encouraged but not required.

    Here are five sample thesis statements for the prompt comparing 28 Years Later and World War Z as post-COVID allegories, each with clear mapping components:

    1. The Bureaucratic Collapse vs. Emotional Fallout Thesis
     While World War Z depicts a slow-motion collapse of global institutions in the face of a virus that outpaces diplomacy and reason, 28 Years Later focuses on the emotional and ethical wreckage left behind, showing that the true horror of a pandemic lies not in the infection itself but in the unraveling of trust, memory, and social cohesion.

    2. The Misinformation and Fear Contagion Thesis
     Both 28 Years Later and World War Z serve as cultural autopsies of the COVID era, portraying not only viral outbreaks but the parallel contagion of misinformation, fear, and ideological extremism, revealing how modern pandemics are fought as much in echo chambers and comment threads as in laboratories.

    3. The Institutional Failure and Survivalist Morality Thesis
     In their depiction of pandemic response, World War Z shows the impotence of top-down globalism, while 28 Years Later offers a bottom-up view of localized anarchy and survivalist ethics, together illustrating a post-COVID cinematic shift from faith in institutions to tribal resilience and moral ambiguity.

    4. The Pandemic as Psychological Reckoning Thesis
     More than disaster films, 28 Years Later and World War Z use the aesthetics of horror and action to stage a psychological reckoning with the trauma of COVID—28 Years Later captures the rage and exhaustion of a public pushed to its emotional brink, while World War Z visualizes the logistical panic and fractured chain of authority that left millions globally disoriented and unmoored.

    5. The Allegory of Polarization Thesis
     28 Years Later and World War Z reflect the political polarization accelerated by COVID by framing survival as dependent not on unity but on division—on isolation, suspicion, and competing narratives of truth—suggesting that in a fractured society, pandemics don’t create monsters so much as they expose them.