Blog

Prompt:
In the documentaries The Inventor: Out for Blood in Silicon Valley, FYRE: The Greatest Party That Never Happened, and The Game Changers, we are invited into seductive worlds where cutting-edge technology, elite experiences, and revolutionary nutrition promise to transform our lives. But beneath the glossy exteriors and rousing rhetoric lies something far more insidious: a machinery of manipulation fueled by fear, fantasy, and illusion.

Each of these films documents a different kind of grift. Elizabeth Holmes built a biotech empire on vaporware and mythic charisma. Billy McFarland orchestrated a luxury festival that never existed. And James Wilks curated a plant-based gospel that selectively omitted dissenting science while cloaking itself in the authority of elite athletes. Yet all three operate using the same emotional lever: FOMO—the Fear of Missing Out. In these narratives, aspiration becomes submission, and the fear of being left behind replaces critical judgment with blind faith.

This essay invites you to compare and analyze how these three documentaries explore deception, manipulation, and grift. Your goal is to show how FOMO, Bro Culture, influencer mythology, and selective fact presentation become tools to silence skepticism and provoke submission in the name of personal betterment, innovation, or belonging.

You must write a 1,700-word argumentative essay that:

• Analyzes the rhetorical and visual strategies used in each documentary
  
• Explores the cultural conditions (e.g., social media, startup worship, fitness obsession) that allow grifters to thrive
  
• Examines how the fear of exclusion or inadequacy is exploited
  
• Includes at least one counterargument—perhaps defending one of the documentaries as sincere or visionary
  
• Draws on specific scenes and evidence from all three works
  

Your writing should be clear, vivid, and analytical—not a summary, but a sustained critique of how manipulation is disguised as progress, empowerment, or elite access.

Three Sample Thesis Statements

1. The Inventor, FYRE, and The Game Changers each reveal that in the age of Instagram envy and startup hagiography, grifters thrive not by lying outright but by weaponizing FOMO, influencer culture, and selective truths to turn human aspiration into unquestioning submission.
   
2. Though each documentary presents a different domain—technology, luxury events, and nutrition—all three expose how charismatic leaders exploit our fear of being average, leveraging curated images, vague promises, and social proof to bypass critical thinking and create psychological dependency.
   
3. The seductive narratives in The Game Changers, The Inventor, and FYRE depend on a potent emotional cocktail: the fear of irrelevance, the myth of optimization, and the desire to belong to a superior class—all of which are weaponized to suppress doubt and promote conformity under the guise of empowerment.
   

Suggested Outline

I. Introduction (150–200 words)

• Open with a compelling hook: the rise of the modern grifter in the age of social media and aspiration
  
• Briefly introduce the three documentaries and their subjects (Holmes, McFarland, Wilks)
  
• Define key concepts: FOMO, influencer mythology, selective omission, and Bro Culture
  
• Thesis: Make a clear argument about how each work illustrates that fear and aspiration can be weaponized to create compliance and suppress critical thought
  

II. The Emotional Architecture of Grift: FOMO and the Loss of Judgment (250–300 words)

• Define FOMO not just as anxiety but as a cognitive vulnerability exploited by marketers and grifters
  
• Show how each film presents characters who rely on this fear to manipulate others
  
  • FYRE: Attendees wanted the Instagrammable experience of the decade
    
  • The Inventor: Investors feared missing the next Steve Jobs or Uber
    
  • The Game Changers: Viewers fear being left behind in performance, health, or masculinity
    
• Argue that in each case, critical thinking is not defeated by logic, but by emotion and branding
  

III. Bro Culture and the Theater of Confidence (300–350 words)

• Explain Bro Culture as a fusion of overconfidence, charisma, and anti-intellectualism masquerading as innovation
  
• Analyze how Elizabeth Holmes, Billy McFarland, and James Wilks each use performance to bypass scrutiny
  
  • Holmes’ black turtleneck and “deep voice” as a Jobs cosplay
    
  • McFarland’s delusional optimism and frat-boy persuasion
    
  • Wilks’ rhetorical aggression and the “alpha” appeal of elite athletes
    
• Show how Bro Culture rewards dominance over nuance, and why this suppresses dissent
  

IV. Influencer Mythology and the Illusion of Belonging (300–350 words)

• Analyze how each documentary critiques the role of influencers as modern prophets of lifestyle
  
  • FYRE: The “orange tile” Instagram campaign and models like Bella Hadid
    
  • Game Changers: Use of elite athletes and celebrities to confer credibility
    
  • Inventor: Media outlets breathlessly elevating Holmes as a savior
    
• Argue that influencers don’t just sell products—they sell status, and the public follows not out of reason but a desire to belong to the “chosen” group
  

V. Selective Omission of Facts and the Death of Nuance (300–350 words)

• Examine how each subject used the omission of inconvenient truths to maintain a compelling narrative
  
  • The Game Changers: Cherry-picked science, anecdotal evidence, and lack of scientific counterpoints
    
  • The Inventor: Holmes’ secrecy about test accuracy, repeated lies to regulators and the public
    
  • FYRE: Marketing luxury while hiding logistical chaos and lack of infrastructure
    
• Argue that omission is more dangerous than lying—it builds castles in the air with the appearance of truth
  

VI. Counterargument and Rebuttal (200–250 words)

• Possible counterargument: One or more of the subjects had sincere goals or brought attention to important ideas (e.g., plant-based diets, female CEOs, festival culture)
  
• Rebuttal: Intentions don’t negate the damage caused by deception. If anything, the appearance of noble intent is what makes the manipulation more effective
  
• Acknowledge complexity, but emphasize the core argument: FOMO and social performance are tools of compliance, not enlightenment
  

VII. Conclusion (150–200 words)

• Reaffirm your thesis: These documentaries expose a common structure of manipulation dressed up as progress
  
• Reflect on the cultural cost: When aspiration becomes submission, when we follow grifters out of fear of missing out, we lose not just money or time—but autonomy
  
• End with a warning or call to vigilance: In an age of curated truth and high-performance grift, critical thinking is not optional—it’s survival
  

Essay Prompt:
In Frederick Douglass’ Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, the protagonist fights not only for freedom from physical slavery but for a reclamation of his identity and voice. In Get Out (dir. Jordan Peele), Chris Washington must escape a literal and psychological “Sunken Place”—a symbolic void of powerlessness, silencing, and racial objectification. In Black Panther (dir. Ryan Coogler), T’Challa and the people of Wakanda face a choice: remain isolated in comfortable superiority or courageously intervene in global struggles for justice. Across these three works, we encounter individuals and cultures confronting moral inertia and existential erasure.

This essay asks you to consider the Bushido Warrior Code—with its emphasis on courage, loyalty, honor, and self-sacrifice—as a framework of moral resistance. How can Bushido function as a psychological, cultural, and ethical antidote to the Sunken Place—that metaphoric (and literal) realm where people are silenced, dehumanized, or seduced into passivity?

Your task is to write a 1,700-word argumentative essay that explores how Douglass, Chris and Rod from Get Out, and Wakanda in Black Panther demonstrate that adopting a moral code like Bushido is essential to resisting oppression, reclaiming agency, and transforming society.

Use close textual analysis, specific scenes, and well-supported reasoning. You are encouraged to include at least one counterargument—perhaps challenging whether Bushido fits all three stories—and offer a thoughtful rebuttal.

Three Sample Thesis Statements

1. Frederick Douglass, Chris Washington, and T’Challa all embody the Bushido Warrior Code through their courageous defiance of systems that attempt to silence and control them; by embracing loyalty, honor, and self-sacrifice, they resist the moral numbness of the Sunken Place and reclaim agency for themselves and their communities.
   
2. Though Bushido originates in a different cultural context, the warrior code’s emphasis on ethical action and personal sacrifice provides a powerful framework to understand how Douglass, the heroes of Get Out, and Black Panther all triumph over forces that seek to render them passive, complicit, or invisible.
   
3. The Sunken Place in Get Out is not limited to that film; it is a universal metaphor for psychological captivity. Through their pursuit of truth, dignity, and moral clarity, the protagonists in Douglass’ memoir and Black Panther reflect Bushido’s core principles, showing that only a warrior’s mindset can break the chains of silence and conformity.
   

Definition of the Bushido Warrior Code (Relevant to Douglass, Get Out, and Black Panther):

The Bushido Warrior Code is a moral and spiritual framework rooted in Japanese samurai tradition, demanding loyalty, courage, honor, and self-sacrifice in the face of injustice. In the context of Frederick Douglass, Chris Washington and Rod Williams from Get Out, and the Wakandan principles in Black Panther, Bushido can be redefined as the unflinching resolve to resist dehumanization, speak truth to power, and protect others—even at great personal risk.

Douglass, once enslaved and denied his humanity, lived by a code of radical moral clarity: to reclaim his identity and liberate others through truth, intellect, and action. Chris’s escape from the Armitage estate—and Rod’s relentless pursuit to save him—embody Bushido’s call to act with bravery and loyalty against a system of manipulation and violence. In Black Panther, the leaders of Wakanda struggle between tradition and global responsibility, but T’Challa’s decision to share Wakanda’s resources to uplift oppressed communities aligns with Bushido’s ethic of using strength not for domination, but for justice.

Thus, Bushido in this contemporary and intercultural context becomes the warrior’s vow to confront moral cowardice, challenge systems of oppression, and hold fast to integrity—even when the world offers comfort in exchange for silence.

Suggested Outline

I. Introduction (150–200 words)

• Define the Bushido Warrior Code briefly (contextualized for this essay)
  
• Introduce the idea of the “Sunken Place” as symbolic of dehumanization, passivity, and moral disengagement
  
• Introduce the three works: Douglass’ memoir, Get Out, and Black Panther
  
• Thesis statement: Make a clear argument about how Bushido operates as a moral antidote to the Sunken Place across all three works
  

II. The Sunken Place: A Shared Metaphor for Oppression (200–250 words)

• Define and analyze the literal and metaphorical meaning of the Sunken Place in Get Out
  
• Briefly link this idea to Douglass’ experience of slavery and enforced ignorance
  
• Connect to Wakanda’s early isolationism and Killmonger’s anger as signs of a fractured moral stance
  
• Set up the argument that Bushido, or a similar moral code, offers a counter-force to this condition
  

III. Frederick Douglass as a Bushido Warrior (300–350 words)

• Discuss Douglass’ path from passive suffering to empowered resistance
  
• Explore moments in the narrative that exemplify Bushido traits:
  
  • Courage (e.g., fighting Mr. Covey)
    
  • Honor (his pursuit of literacy as self-respect)
    
  • Loyalty (to his people and his mission, not the system that enslaved him)
    
• Argue that Douglass reclaims his humanity and escapes the “Sunken Place” through an internal code of ethics
  

IV. Get Out: Chris and Rod as Modern-Day Bushido Figures (300–350 words)

• Analyze Chris’s slow awakening to the danger around him and his eventual decision to fight back
  
• Highlight Rod’s unwavering loyalty and moral clarity—his refusal to give up on Chris
  
• Argue that Chris’s violent escape is not just survival but a Bushido-like reclaiming of self-respect and autonomy
  
• Explore how Peele dramatizes the moment Chris “rises” out of the Sunken Place—both literally and ethically
  

V. Black Panther: Wakanda’s Ethical Crossroads and the Warrior Ideal (300–350 words)

• Examine Wakanda’s moral dilemma: comfort through isolation vs. courage through engagement
  
• Focus on T’Challa’s development—his shift from traditionalism to global responsibility
  
• Consider the Dora Milaje as examples of Bushido: duty, honor, sacrifice
  
• Argue that Wakanda’s decision to emerge and help others is a national application of Bushido ethics
  

VI. Counterargument and Rebuttal (200–250 words)

• Erik Killmonger presents a compelling counterargument to the Bushido Warrior Code by rejecting its emphasis on honor, restraint, and loyalty to tradition. For Killmonger, these values have failed the oppressed; they uphold systems that preserve power rather than challenge injustice. Unlike Bushido’s disciplined path of self-sacrifice for a noble cause, Killmonger pursues vengeance through domination and disruption. He sees mercy as weakness, diplomacy as delay, and tradition as complicity. His worldview is shaped by trauma and abandonment, and he believes liberation can only come through violent upheaval—not moral purity.
• Yet this rage-fueled rejection of Bushido ultimately collapses under its own weight. While Killmonger is right to expose the moral cowardice of Wakanda’s past isolation, his scorched-earth tactics mirror the very oppression he seeks to destroy. The Bushido Code, properly understood, is not about submission to broken systems but about disciplined, courageous resistance grounded in honor. T’Challa’s evolution proves this: he learns from Killmonger’s challenge but rejects his methods, choosing instead to open Wakanda to the world and lead with strength and conscience. In doing so, T’Challa shows that true justice does not abandon moral codes—it transforms them to meet the moment.
  

VII. Conclusion (150–200 words)

• Restate the central claim: These three works show that resisting oppression requires not just escape, but ethical transformation
  
• Reaffirm that Bushido, though ancient and foreign in origin, offers a moral blueprint for reclaiming agency in a dehumanizing world
  
• End with a powerful thought or question: What happens when more people choose a warrior’s courage over the comfort of silence?