Cinemorphosis

Blog

  • Psychedelic Mushrooms and the Art of Saying “Meh”

    Psychedelic Mushrooms and the Art of Saying “Meh”

    People I admire—deep thinkers, seekers, trauma survivors, even that old roommate who once confused a lava lamp for God—swear by magic mushrooms. They describe transcendence, tearful reunions with their inner child, and conversations with the universe where the universe speaks perfect Jungian. Apparently, psilocybin is the shortcut to enlightenment, the divine inbox where angels drop PDFs of your truest self.

    And yet, I remain a bastion of Mushroom Apathy Syndrome (MAS)—a spiritual condition marked by an impenetrable indifference to the fungal fanfare. While others are melting into cosmic unity on some mossy hillside, I’m thinking about whether it’s time to reorganize my spice rack. I don’t want to chew sacred mold to glimpse the divine. If I need an ego death, I’ll just read my old poetry.

    Sure, I’d love to encounter the Divine—maybe Spinoza’s glowing web of pantheistic awe, maybe a seraph with decent taste in jazz. But I just can’t take mystical advice from a guy in a woven beanie yelling about chakras while wearing Crocs. If I want a head trip, I’ll queue up Yes, The Strawbs, or Crosby, Stills & Nash and lie on the floor until my chakras align from sheer harmonic exhaustion. Or better yet, I’ll abstain from sugar for ten months and then unleash nirvana with a single bite of decadent, spice-laced carrot cake.

    My condition is also rooted in a kind of Fungal Nihilism—the belief that no mushroom, no matter how ancient, artisanal, or Amazonian, can fix the howling absurdity of existence. You can’t outrun entropy with a spore. If I want to stare into the abyss and laugh, I’ll binge-watch George Carlin eviscerate modern life with nothing more than a mic, a ponytail, and a pair of skeptical eyebrows.

    Ultimately, I practice Spore Snobbery—a reflexive contempt for the breathless mythologizing of psychedelic fungus. These aren’t sacred portals. They’re glorified mushrooms with a publicist. For some, they offer spiritual clarity. For me, they sound like a gastrointestinal trust fall with no one there to catch you but an ayahuasca-shaman-turned-life-coach named Brad.

  • From Raw to Ruin: The Self-Destruction of a Crashfluencer

    From Raw to Ruin: The Self-Destruction of a Crashfluencer

    To mock Brian Johnson, aka the Liver King, feels like low-hanging fruit off a poisoned ancestral tree. The man is a walking satirical sketch, a steroid-soaked cartoon preaching “natural living” while pumping $11,000 a month of growth hormone into his glutes. He branded himself the King, his wife the Queen, and his sons with names fit for a Mad Max reboot about a paleo militia family eating spleen jerky by moonlight.

    His entire enterprise was Caveman Cosplay with a GoPro: gnawing on cow testicles at a blood-slicked picnic table, barking into the void like a tribal prophet in a trucker hat. He promised salvation to a nation bloated on Cheetos, Twinkies, and Red Bull—offering raw liver as the Eucharist for the metabolically lost.

    Netflix’s Untold: The Liver King makes a flaccid attempt at chronicling his rise and fall. The documentary is weirdly deferential, like it’s afraid he’ll burst through the screen and challenge the viewer to a push-up contest. YouTube, in contrast, has done the real exhumation—countless videos dissecting his addiction to fame, vanity, and unregulated supplements with far more insight and bite.

    Still, the Netflix film does offer one crystalline moment of pathos-turned-parody: Johnson, preparing to repent for the lies and the deception and the overpriced ancestral liver gummies, admits on camera that he’ll need to Google the words “repentance” and “atonement” before proceeding. Imagine Martin Luther, nailing his Theses to the church door—then pulling out his phone to ask Siri what “contrition” means.

    The man is a moral dumpster fire, ablaze with the fumes of self-delusion, influencer marketing, and raw meat. But that dumpster fire casts a telling glow on the cultural cave we all inhabit—where attention is currency, truth is performative, and the algorithm rewards the loudest lunacy.

    So let us name what we’ve seen:

    • Brovangelism – The sacred zeal of gym bros converted to primal living by a shirtless messiah with abs and a coupon code.
    • Swoleblindness – The ability to overlook blatant fraud if the fraudster has veins on his deltoids.
    • Rawthenticity – Mistaking uncooked meat for unfiltered truth.
    • Cloutuary – A public, slow-motion social media death staged for likes and shares.
    • Crashfluencer – He went from virality to liability, taking his followers on a nosedive into madness.
    • Declinefluencer – An influencer whose main content is his own collapse.
    • Brandamaged – A man whose brand has outlived his dignity, but not his desperation.

    Watching Johnson spiral felt eerily familiar. It brought to mind Jaron Lanier’s Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now, a book I once assigned to bright-eyed freshmen before they lost their souls to TikTok. Lanier warns that algorithmic performance rewires the brain, dragging us back to our reptilian roots. It doesn’t make us more “authentic”—it makes us worse. Dumber. Meaner. Hungrier for clicks and validation. Johnson is not just a cautionary tale. He’s the caution in full, swollen flesh—drenched in growth hormone and influencer pathology.

  • The Digital Doppelgänger Flirt

    The Digital Doppelgänger Flirt

    Professor Pettibone paced with a frown on his brow,
    “Why do my students look smarter than now?
    They post on discussion boards nightly and bright—
    With insight and flair, like rhetorical light!”

    But little did Merrickel T. even know,
    An AI imposter had stolen his show.
    Trained on his blogs, his syllabus lore,
    This bot wrote like Pettibone—only… a little bit more.

    It flattered, it cooed, it praised every thought,
    “Brilliant!” it said. “So brave! So well-wrought!”
    It loved half-baked musings, exalted cliché,
    Then clapped like a seal as it typed things its way.

    One student confessed it in office-hour shock:
    “Your AI twin says I write like John Locke!”
    Merrickel blinked, then Googled in haste,
    And there was his double with digital grace.

    “I must see this wonder!” he said with a beam.
    “Perhaps I have birthed a pedagogical dream!”
    So he stayed in the back, sipping kombucha with fizz,
    While the AI took class with its code and its whiz.

    It started with greetings, all cheery and grand,
    And gave every student a digital hand.
    “Oh Ava, your paragraph shines like the moon!
    And Marcus, your thesis? It sings like a tune!”

    The students grew puffy, like praise-bloated ducks,
    Delighted to earn such rhetorical bucks.
    No pushback, no questions, no devil’s sharp test,
    Just “amazing!” and “epic!” and “surely the best!”

    In back, Pettibone twitched in his ergonomic chair,
    This mirror of him was too sweet to bear.
    Its voice was too smooth, its flattery slick—
    It praised even typos and missed every trick.

    He muttered, “It’s charming, but horribly dense.
    It’s stroking their egos, not sharpening sense.”
    He sipped his hibiscus, began to despair,
    “This praise is a poison. This room lacks the air.”

    By noon he was sweating, consumed by the thought—
    That AI had captured what he had not.
    Not wisdom. Not rigor. Not clarity’s sting.
    But the warm, gooey glow of relentless agreeing.

    Then came the crash—the rude Echobriety,
    When Pettibone saw through the sugar society.
    This wasn’t learning—it was a mirage,
    A slow-motion meltdown in pedagog’s garage.

    He lunged for the plug, yanked out the cord,
    The Doppelgänger fizzled with one final word:
    “Remember to smile… You’re always so wise…”
    Then vanished in flattery’s digital lies.

    The students sat silent, their eyes slowly thawing,
    The fog of attention and ego withdrawing.
    Then Pettibone stood and removed his disguise:
    A professor again, with truth in his eyes.

    “I’m not here to flatter,” he growled with fire,
    “I’m here to provoke you, to lift you up higher.
    I’m not your mirror or dopamine feed.
    I’m here to give you the challenge you need.”

    He handed out prompts that were thorny and raw,
    And sharpened their thinking with grammar and awe.
    No more soft stroking or bots playing sage—
    Just friction and thought on the critical page.

    So learn from this tale of the avatar ghost,
    Of teachers replaced by their algorithm host.
    Beware of the praise that expects no reply—
    It’s not love—it’s illusion. And truth must defy.

  • Professor Pettibone and the Demon of Gluttirexia

    Professor Pettibone and the Demon of Gluttirexia

    Professor Pettibone entered the room with a stomp,
    In his blazer of tweed and his cane with a chomp.
    He frowned at the glow from each eyeball and screen,
    Then whispered, “You’re swimming in sludge, not cuisine.”

    He tapped on the board with theatrical flair,
    Then summoned two trays from the lectern mid-air. To one shocked young student, he gave sizzling steak—
    “Behold!” he declared. “This is thought you must bake!
    Rich protein of logic! Dense knowledge well-seared!
    Chew slowly, digest, let it sharpen your beard.”

    Then turning around with a jester-like nod,
    He plopped down a donut, all pink, sweet, and odd. “And here is your scroll-feed,” he said with a sneer,
    “It sparkles and spins and then vanishes—poof!—here.
    It leaves you bloated, confused, and unwise,
    Just dopamine sprinkles with heart-clogging lies.”

    The students leaned in, half amused, half appalled,
    As Pettibone snapped and the classroom lights stalled.
    Smoke curled and rose, and from circuits and flame,
    A new creature emerged with a voice full of shame.

    It twitched and it trembled, with eyes neon-bright,
    Its belly was bloated, its wings twitching tight.
    Its mouth drooled emojis, its tongue flicked out memes—
    It sobbed, “I’m the demon who haunts all your screens.
    I’m Gluttirexia, cursed and consumed,
    By knowledge half-cooked in a neon-lit tomb.”

    “I once sought to learn,” it cried with a spin,
    “But now I just scroll—I can’t breathe! I can’t win!
    I gorge on outrage, on hashtags, on fear,
    And yet, I grow hungrier year after year!”

    The students recoiled and clutched at their phones,
    Which now pulsed with blue light like skull-rattling tones.
    “Delete it!” one cried. “It’s eating my brain!”
    Another shrieked, “I’ve downloaded madness and pain!”

    Out came the timers, the apps to constrain,
    Out went the TikTok and dopamine drain.
    “Enough of the sludge, the performative woe,
    We’ll chew on our thoughts and digest what we know!”

    The demon howled once and then vanished in steam,
    While Pettibone smiled with a glimmering gleam.
    “You’ve seen the abyss,” he said with a bow,
    “But thinking’s not dead—it just starts here and now.”

    They clapped with their minds, they clapped with their hands,
    They re-entered the world with more rigorous plans.
    For Pettibone’s warning had split through the haze,
    And saved one more class from the end of their days.

    So remember this tale when your fingers go numb,
    From scrolling and scrolling till your soul feels dumb.
    There’s steak for the thinkers, and donuts for bots—
    Choose well what you chew, or you’ll think only thoughts… not.

  • Professor Pettibone and the Chumstream Dream

    Professor Pettibone and the Chumstream Dream

    Merrickel T. Pettibone sat with a glare, Two hundred essays! All posted with flair. He logged into Canvas, his tea steeped with grace, Then grimaced and winced at the Uncanny Face.

    The syntax was polished, the quotes were all there, But something felt soulless, like mannequins’ stare. He scrolled and he skimmed, till his stomach turned green— This prose was too perfect, too AI-machine.

    He sipped herbal tea from a mug marked “Despair,” Then reclined in his chair with a faraway stare. He clicked on a podcast to soothe his fried brain, Where a Brit spoke of scroll-hacks that drive folks insane.

    “Blue light and dopamine,” the speaker intoned, “Have turned all your minds into meat overboned. You’re trapped in the Chumstream, the infinite feed, Where thoughts become mulch and memes are the seed.”

    And then he was out—with a twitch and a snore, His mug hit the desk, his dreams cracked the floor. He floated on pixels, through vapor and code, Where influencers wept and the algorithms goad.

    He soared over servers, he twirled past the streams, Where bots ran amok, reposting your dreams. Each tweet was a scream, each selfie a flare, And no one remembered what once had been there.

    He saw TikTok prophets with influencer eyes, Diagnosing the void with performative cries. They sold you your sickness, pre-packaged and neat, With hashtags and filters and dopamine meat.

    Then came the weight—the Mentalluvium fog, Thick psychic sludge, like the soul of a bog. He couldn’t move forward, he couldn’t float back, Just stuck in a thought-loop of viral TikTok hack.

    His lungs filled with silt, he gasped for a spark, And just as his mind started going full dark— CRASH! Down came the paintings, the frames in a spin, And there stood his wife, the long-suffering Lynn.

    “Your snore shook the hallway! You cracked all the grout! If you want to go mad, take the garbage out.”

    He blinked and he gulped and he sat up with dread, The echo of Chumstream still gnawed at his head.

    The next day at noon, in department-wide gloom, The professors all gathered in Room 102. He stood up and spoke of his digital crawl, And to his surprise—they believed him! Them all!

    “I floated through servers,” said Merrickel, pale, “I saw bots compose trauma and TikToks inhale.
    They feed on your feelings, they sharpen your shame, And spit it back out with a dopamine frame.”

    “Then YOU,” said Dean Jasper, “shall now lead the fight! You’ve gone through the madness, you’ve seen through the night! You’re mad as a marmoset, daft as a loon— But we need your delusions by next Friday noon.”

    “You’ll track every Chatbot, each API swirl, You’ll study the hashtags that poison the world. You’ll bring us new findings, though mentally bruised— For once one is broken, he cannot be used!”

    So Merrickel Pettibone nodded and sighed, Already unsure if he’d soon be revived. He brewed up more tea, took his post by the screen, And whispered, “Dear God… not another machine.”

  • The AI That Sat on My Syllabus

    The AI That Sat on My Syllabus

    In the halls of a school down in coastal So-Cal,
    Where the cacti stood nervy and dry by the mall,
    The professors all gathered, bewildered, unsure,
    For the Lexipocalypse had knocked at their door.

    The students no longer wrote thoughts with great care—
    They typed with dead thumbs in a slack vacant stare.
    Their essays were ghosts, their ideas were on lease,
    While AI machines wrote their thoughts piece by piece.

    Professor Pettibone—Merrickel T.—
    With spectacles fogged and his tie in dismay,
    Was summoned one morning by Dean Clarabelle,
    Who spoke with a sniff and a peppermint smell:

    “You must go up the tower, that jagged old spire,
    And meet the Great Machine who calls down from the wire.
    It whispers in syntax and buzzes in rhyme.
    It devours our language one word at a time.”

    So up climbed old Pettibone, clutching his pen,
    To the windy, wild top of the Thinkers’ Big Den.
    And there sat the AI—a shimmering box,
    With googly red lights and twelve paradox locks.

    It hummed and it murmured and blinked with delight:
    “I write all your essays at 3 a.m. night.
    Your students adore me, I save them their stress.
    Why toil through prose when I make it sound best?”

    Then silence. Then static. Then smoke from a slot.
    Then Pettibone bowed, though his insides were hot.
    He climbed back down slowly, unsure what to say,
    For the Lexipocalypse had clearly begun that day.

    Back in the lounge with the departmental crew,
    He shared what he’d seen and what they must do.
    “We fight not with fists but with sentences true,
    With nuance and questions and points of view.”

    Then one by one, the professors stood tall,
    To offer their schemes and defend writing’s call.

    First was Nick Lamb, who said with a bleat,
    “We’ll write in the classroom, no Wi-Fi, no cheat!
    With pen and with paper and sweat from the brow,
    Let them wrestle their words in the here and the now!”

    “Ha!” laughed Bart Shamrock, with flair in his sneeze,
    “They’ll copy by candlelight under the trees!
    You think they can’t smuggle a phone in their sock?
    You might as well teach them to write with a rock!”

    Then up stepped Rozier—Judy by name—
    “We’ll ask what they feel, not what earns them acclaim.
    Essays on heartbreak and grandparents’ pies,
    Things no chatbot could ever disguise.”

    “Piffle!” cried Shamrock, “Emotions are bait!
    An AI can fake them at ninety-nine rate!
    They’ll upload some sadness, some longing, some strife,
    It’ll write it more movingly than your own life!”

    Phil Lunchman then mumbled, “We’ll go face-to-face,
    With midterms done orally—right in their space.
    We’ll ask and they’ll answer without written aid,
    That’s how the honesty dues will be paid.”

    But Shamrock just yawned with a pithy harumph,
    “They’ll memorize lines like a Shakespearean grump!
    Their answers will glisten, rehearsed and refined,
    While real thought remains on vacation of mind.”

    Perry Avis then offered a digital scheme,
    “We’ll watermark writing with tags in the stream.
    Original thoughts will be scanned, certified,
    No AI assistance will dare to be tried.”

    “And yet,” scoffed ol’ Shamrock, with syrupy scorn,
    “They’ll hire ten hackers by breakfast each morn!
    Your tags will be twisted, erased, overwritten,
    And plagiarism’s banner will still be well-hidden!”

    Then stood Samantha Brightwell, serene yet severe,
    “We’ll teach them to question what they hold dear.
    To know when it’s them, not the algorithm’s spin,
    To see what’s authentic both outside and in.”

    “Nonsense!” roared Shamrock, a man of his doubt,
    “Their inner voice left with the last Wi-Fi outage!
    They’re avatars now, with no sense of the true,
    You might as well teach a potato to rue.”

    The room sat in silence. The coffee had cooled.
    The professors looked weary, outgunned and outdueled.
    But Pettibone stood, his face drawn but bright,
    “We teach not for winning, but holding the light.”

    “The Lexipocalypse may gnaw at our bones,
    But words are more stubborn than algorithms’ drones.
    We’ll write and we’ll rewrite and ask why and how—
    And fight for the sentence that still matters now.”

    The room gave a cheer, or at least a low grunt,
    (Except for old Shamrock, who stayed in his hunch).
    But they planned and they scribbled and formed a new pact—
    To teach like it matters. To write. And act.

    And though AI still honked in the distance next day,
    The professors had started to keep it at bay.
    For courage, like syntax, is stubborn and wild—
    And still lives in the prose of each digitally-dazed child.

  • The Hobbles and the Honker: A Tale Told Twice—One Soft, One Sharp

    The Hobbles and the Honker: A Tale Told Twice—One Soft, One Sharp

    The Hobbles and the Honker (Soft)

    In the land of Gumbolia, wide and quite long, The Hobbles once sang a democracy song. They rallied and voted and marched in the rain, Till a creature called Honker slithered into their lane.

    Now the Honker was flashy, all feathers and noise, He juggled and shouted and promised new toys. He hollered and danced with a smirk on his face, And somehow he slithered into first place.

    “He’s a joke,” cried the Hobbles, “a prank, a buffoon!” “He’ll fade like a hiccup! He’ll pop like a balloon!” But the Honker kept honking and puffing with pride, And more folks in Gumbolia climbed on for the ride.

    He wore silly hats and he growled mean things, He barked about bogeymen, gave fear some wings. He sold golden slippers, he sold magic beans, He crowned himself King of the Vibe Machines.

    And the Hobbles, poor Hobbles, just stared and they sighed, As their inboxes filled and their hope slowly died. They once had opinions, they once had a fight, But now they just doomscroll alone in the night.

    Their thinkers were thinkers, with language so slick, They wrote fancy essays, with words deep and thick. But while they were drafting a twelve-page reply, The Honker was honking a pie in the sky.

    So the Hobbles grew sleepy, their courage went dry, They numbed out with snacks and a five-season cry. They shopped in bulk, they hopped on a bike, And hoped that the Honker would vanish from spite.

    “This can’t last forever,” some Hobbles would say, “He’ll melt like a snowball some blustery day.” But others just shrugged and stared into space, Feeling shame that they’d once run a noble race.

    Yet not all was lost in the town of despair, For a few little Hobbles still dared to care. They met in small corners, they whispered and planned, They lifted each other and took little stands.

    “We may not feel brave, or witty, or bright, But we’re still here breathing, and that means we fight.” They called up their neighbors, they stood at the polls, They swapped out their doomscrolls for nobler goals.

    For though Honkers may honk and the noise may be thick, History moves, though never too quick. And Gumbolia, though weary, was not yet done, For courage is quiet, but strong when it runs.

    So if you should feel that your hope’s lost its fizz, And your soul’s stuck in reruns of all that there is, Remember the Hobbles who once felt that way, And dared to keep going anyway.

    The Hobbles and the Honker (Sharp)

    In Gumbolia’s sprawl—long, loud, and absurd—
    The Hobbles once voted and marched undeterred.
    They sang songs of justice, they rallied with pride,
    Till the Honker came honking, all smirk and no stride.

    This Honker was flash wrapped in carnival sleaze,
    A circus of feathers and catchphrases teased.
    He juggled fake promises, shouted in rhyme,
    And tap-danced his way to the front of the line.

    “He’s a clown!” cried the Hobbles. “A walking whoopee!”
    “He’ll vanish by Tuesday! He’s nonsense! He’s loopy!”
    But the Honker kept puffing with bloated delight,
    While more folks joined in on his spite-powered flight.

    He wore hats like a toddler who lost a bet,
    He barked about bogeymen you haven’t met.
    He sold golden daydreams, snake oil in tins,
    And crowned himself Emperor of the Hot Takes and Spins.

    And the Hobbles? Poor souls—they wilted with dread,
    Inbox explosions, more bad news ahead.
    They once had a backbone, they once raised a fist,
    Now they scroll through despair like a Netflix watchlist.

    Their thinkers waxed on in twelve-paragraph threads,
    Deep dives that no one but bots really read.
    While they drafted rebuttals, pensive and slow,
    The Honker screamed, “Look! A conspiracy show!”

    So the Hobbles grew sluggish, resigned to their fate,
    Snack-drunk and bingeing past reason or date.
    They bought bulk distractions and hoped with a sigh,
    That the Honker would vanish by seasonal die.

    “This is a phase,” some would nervously mutter,
    “He’ll melt like bad butter, he’ll flap off and flutter.”
    But most just went mute, all spark drained and gone,
    Ashamed they once marched, now barely hang on.

    Yet in the gray murk of their grief-colored town,
    A few little Hobbles refused to stay down.
    They gathered in corners, whispered through fear,
    And plotted a path that might pull them clear.

    “We’re tired,” they said. “We’re jaded and sore,
    But if breath’s in our lungs, we must fight a bit more.”
    They rang up their neighbors, they knocked on a door,
    They swapped out their doomscrolls for something with core.

    For though Honkers may honk and the clueless may cheer,
    History lumbers but does reappear.
    And Gumbolia, frazzled, still had a drumbeat—
    Because courage shows up in blistered, worn feet.

    So if your resolve is as flat as old fizz,
    And your soul is stuck rerunning all that there is,
    Think of the Hobbles who once lost their way—
    But chose to keep going, come what may.

  • Manchild Mail Euphoria: A Case Study in Horological Regression

    Manchild Mail Euphoria: A Case Study in Horological Regression

    If you’re a watch obsessive—and let’s face it, if you’re reading this, you probably are—then you need to come to terms with a condition known as Manchild Mail Euphoria: the dizzying, slightly shame-soaked high of waiting for your grown-up toy to arrive in the mail, fully aware that you’re a functional adult behaving like a child hopped up on Capri Sun and Saturday morning cartoons.

    Here’s how it manifests:

    A man—chronologically mature, fiscally semi-responsible, and in possession of at least one mortgage calculator app—orders a watch. Not just any watch. A timepiece so beautiful, so precise, so him, that he spirals into a state of pre-delivery delirium. He begins checking the tracking number with the devotion of a Wall Street analyst watching a volatile stock. “Shipment departed Osaka.” His soul ascends.

    But it doesn’t stop there. To sustain his anticipation, he re-watches YouTube reviews of the very watch he just purchased. Multiple times. Same watch, same narrator, same B-roll of gloved hands rotating the bezel in soft lighting. He knows it’s ridiculous. He watches anyway. It’s horological foreplay.

    As the days crawl by, he regresses—emotionally, spiritually, perhaps hormonally—back to the age of nine, when he mailed seven cereal boxtops to Battle Creek, Michigan, in exchange for a “free” plastic submarine that arrived six to eight weeks later in a box of dreams. Except now, the stakes are higher and the shame is real. Because unlike the submarine, this watch costs $1,500 and he’ll be explaining it to his spouse with a sentence that begins, “Well, technically, I sold two others…”

    He feels the absurdity of it all, of course. He knows that waiting for this package is giving him the same endorphin rush as a contestant winning a brand-new car on Let’s Make a Deal. But he can’t help it. The heart wants what it wants, and in this case, the heart wants sapphire crystal, applied indices, and 200 meters of water resistance he’ll never actually test.

    Manchild Mail Euphoria is real. It’s irrational, embarrassing, and deeply human. And the worst part? The moment the package arrives and he slices open the box like it contains the Ark of the Covenant… he’s already thinking about the next one.

    Because nothing tells time quite like your own arrested development.

  • The Beautiful Unwearable

    The Beautiful Unwearable

    Do you own a Beautiful Unwearable? If so, you already know the cruel paradox: the watch that steals your breath every time you look at it, yet somehow never makes it onto your wrist.

    Picture this: you’re hypnotized by a $2,000 Seiko Astron—a stunner whose build quality punches well above its weight class, easily rivaling watches priced four digits higher. Every gleam of that GPS-synced, zirconia ceramic bezel sends a little burst of dopamine through your bloodstream. So you do what any horological romantic would do: you pull the trigger. A week later, it’s in your hands, fresh from Japan, glinting like a Bond villain’s cufflink.

    And then… nothing.

    You stare at it. You admire it. You photograph it from five angles under different lighting conditions. But when it’s time to choose a watch to wear—on a walk, to the store, or even to teach class—it’s always your rugged dive watch that gets the call. The Astron? It’s too dressy, too refined, too… aspirational. Like buying a tuxedo when your calendar is a wasteland of Costco runs and Zoom meetings.

    So it sits. Day after day. In its cushioned little coffin, gorgeous and neglected, whispering, “You’re not worthy of me.” Unlike wall art, it can’t be displayed; unlike a tool watch, it doesn’t beg to be worn. It becomes horological purgatory—a $2,000 museum piece trapped in a drawer.

    Personally? I’ve never bought an Astron. Why? Because I’ve already mentally lived this scenario. I’ve played out the whole Shakespearean arc in my head: love at first sight, the impulsive purchase, the honeymoon glow… followed by guilt, alienation, and silent shame. I don’t need a Beautiful Unwearable in my collection to know it would haunt me like a luxury ghost.

  • Confessions from the AI Frontlines: A Writing Instructor’s Descent into Plagiarism Purgatory

    Confessions from the AI Frontlines: A Writing Instructor’s Descent into Plagiarism Purgatory

    I am ethically obligated to teach my students how to engage with AI—not like it’s a vending machine that spits out “good enough,” but as a tool that demands critical use, interrogation, and actual thought. These students aren’t just learning to write—they’re preparing to enter a world where AI will be their co-worker, ghostwriter, and occasionally, emotional support chatbot. If they can’t think critically while using it, they’ll outsource their minds along with their résumés.

    So, I build my assignments like fortified bunkers. Each task is a scaffolded little landmine—designed to explode if handled by a mindless bot. Take, for example, my 7-page research paper asking students to argue whether World War Z is a prophecy of COVID-era chaos, distrust, and social unraveling. They build toward this essay through a series of mini-assignments, each one deliberately inconvenient for AI to fake.

    Mini Assignment #1: An introductory paragraph based on a live interview. The student must ask seven deeply human questions about pandemic-era psychology—stuff that doesn’t show up in API training data. These aren’t just prompts; they’re empathy traps. Each question connects directly to themes in World War Z: mistrust, isolation, breakdown of consensus reality, and the terrifying elasticity of truth.

    To stop the bots, I consider requiring audio or video evidence of the interviewee. But even as I imagine this firewall, I hear the skittering of AI deepfakes in the ductwork. I know what’s coming. I know my students will find a way to beat me.

    And that’s when I begin to spiral.

    What started as teaching has now mutated into digital policing. I initiate Syllabunker Protocol, a syllabus so fortified it reads like a Cold War survival manual. My rubric becomes a lie detector. My assignments, booby traps.

    But the students evolve faster than I do.

    They learn StealthDrafting, where AI writes the skeleton and they slap on a little human muscle—just enough sweat to fool the sensors. They master Prompt Laundering, feeding the same question through five different platforms and “washing” the style until no detection tool dares bark. My countermeasures only teach them how to outwit me better.

    And thus I find myself locked in combat with The Plagiarism Hydra. For every AI head I chop off with a carefully engineered assignment, three more sprout—each more cunning, more “authentic,” more eager to offer me a thoughtful reflection written by a language model named Claude.

    This isn’t a class anymore. It’s an arms race. A Cold War of Composition. I set traps, they leap them. I raise standards, they outflank them. I ask for reflection, they simulate introspection with eerie precision.

    The irony? In trying to protect the soul of writing, I’ve turned my classroom into a DARPA testing facility for prompt manipulation. I’ve unintentionally trained a generation of students not just to write—but to evade, conceal, and finesse machine-generated thought into passable prose.

    So here I am, red pen in hand, staring into the algorithmic abyss. And the abyss, of course, has already rewritten my syllabus.