Here is the first essay prompt for my critical thinking class:
The Weight of the System: Rethinking Willpower, Obesity, and the Economics of Weight Loss
For decades, society has preached the same mantra: weight loss is a matter of willpower, personal responsibility, and discipline. But what if that narrative is flawed, oversimplified, or even deliberately misleading? In reality, obesity is not just about individual choices—it is shaped by biology, economics, corporate interests, and healthcare disparities. The diet industry thrives on promising easy fixes, while the pharmaceutical industry profits from expensive weight-loss drugs like Ozempic. Meanwhile, processed foods—engineered for addiction—ensure that millions remain locked in an endless cycle of weight gain and dieting.
For this 1,700-word argumentative essay (MLA format required), analyze the misconceptions surrounding weight loss and explore the deeper forces at play. Use the following sources to challenge the idea that weight management is simply about eating less and exercising more:
- Rebecca Johns – “A Diet Writer’s Regrets”
- Johann Hari – “A Year on Ozempic Taught Me We’re Thinking About Obesity All Wrong”
- Harriet Brown – “The Weight of the Evidence”
- Sandra Aamodt – “Why You Can’t Lose Weight on a Diet”
Key Questions to Consider:
- Is personal responsibility a fair framework for understanding obesity, or does it obscure the role of systemic barriers?
- How do economic privilege and the availability of weight-loss drugs like Ozempic create a divide between those who can afford to manage their weight and those who cannot?
- What role does the food industry play in promoting processed, addictive foods while pharmaceutical companies profit from treating the consequences?
- Does the concept of “self-discipline” in dieting ignore scientific realities about metabolism, set points, and the long-term difficulty of maintaining weight loss?
Focus Areas for Analysis:
- Personal Responsibility vs. Systemic Barriers – Johns and Hari challenge the traditional belief that dieting is a matter of willpower, exposing the emotional and physical toll of long-term weight struggles.
- Economic Disparity in Weight Loss Solutions – Hari’s critique of Ozempic highlights the ethical concerns surrounding healthcare access and the commercialization of weight loss.
- The Science of Set Points and Metabolism – Aamodt and Brown explain how biology resists sustained weight loss, complicating the simplistic “calories in, calories out” narrative.
- Capitalism and the Food Industry – Examine how the Industrial Food Complex profits from processed foods while the pharmaceutical industry monetizes weight-related health conditions.
Conclusion:
Is the weight-loss narrative fed to the public based on reality, or is it a distraction from larger economic and corporate interests? Consider how acknowledging these systemic influences could reshape our understanding of obesity and lead to more effective and compassionate solutions.




