Cinemorphosis

Category: Education in the AI Age

  • My Lifelong Marriage to Convenience

    My Lifelong Marriage to Convenience

    There is much to admire about centering our lives on convenience. We save time and resources, avoid wasted effort, and maximize efficiency in the name of what is too often called “optimization.” A life built around convenience often becomes a quest for “life hacks.” But if our behavior is less inventive, we don’t call it a hack at all—just a preference.

    For example, I refuse to go to the gym. It’s inconvenient, time-consuming, costly, and exposes me to airborne illnesses. I prefer to work out in the garage. That’s not a life hack—it’s just easier. The same goes for meals: having a bowl of oatmeal with protein powder and soy milk instead of lunch or dinner isn’t clever or innovative. It’s simply what I do when my family is out and I’m eating alone. Spending more than five minutes on a meal under those circumstances feels unnecessary. Calling a bowl of steel-cut oats or buckwheat groats a “life hack” would be grandiose.

    During the pandemic, three-fourths of my classes moved online through Canvas, a Learning Management System (LMS). Hard copies disappeared. Graded documents were uploaded to the platform, which was remarkably efficient. I didn’t have to drive to campus. The college saved on electricity. That was five years ago, and my classes remain online. I now drive less than 3,000 miles a year. Online classes have made me very efficient. Once you taste efficiency, it’s nearly impossible to go back to inefficiency.

    I admit I’m a less than admirable parent. I don’t like driving my teen daughters to their social functions—birthday parties, football games, dance practices, amusement parks. I find it all inconvenient. That’s my choice. If I were truly devoted to convenience, I wouldn’t have become a parent at all. And certainly not a cat owner. Kitty litter, flea control, vet visits, and travel arrangements are an affront to any serious commitment to convenience.

    As desirable as convenience is, some personalities—mine included—turn it into a pathology. We center our lives around it, and any violation of our convenience policies breeds resentment. Many of these resentments are unreasonable. I resent old age and death, primarily because they are inconvenient. Doctor appointments and funerals interfere with my routine.

    Convenience culture also makes us adore routine. I suspect routine is the groom to the bride of convenience.

    Even my worldview is infected by this impulse. I am an agnostic, which I despise, because it is inconvenient. Agnosticism demands reading and constant reflection. I’ve consumed books by agnostics, atheists, universalists, infernalists, and the post-mortem-salvation curious. While Elizabeth Anderson’s critique of scripture has many compelling points, her notion of morality as nothing more than evolution feels inadequate. Paul’s vision of humanity as fallen and divided is more persuasive and mirrors my own psychology. I wish I could settle happily into Anderson’s worldview. It would be so convenient.

    Speaking of religion, Jesus preached a gospel of inconvenience. His willingness to sacrifice his life in such a manner stands as the very opposite of convenience. For devotees of the gospel of ease, following Jesus is nearly unthinkable—a path that demands nothing less than a Damascus-level upheaval like Paul’s.

    When I think of convenience, I’m reminded of Chris Grossman, a wine salesman I worked with in the 1980s. He was brilliant and affable but had no close relationships. He admitted he didn’t care much for life. He had tried having a girlfriend once and said it was awful—not because of her, but because it was too inconvenient. By his late thirties, he was a bachelor. He ate the same foods every day for simplicity’s sake and once a year drove his Triumph to a car show in Carmel. I loved him for it, because I knew we were both soulmates in convenience culture.

    Some of us are more diseased by this devotion to convenience than others, and it often lowers our standards. I am appalled by factory farming and would like to be vegan. Perhaps if I lived alone, I could do it. But in a family of omnivores, that move would not go over well. I could prepare plant-based meals for myself, but I don’t—partly because of the inconvenience. Vegans I’ve spoken to say the hardest part isn’t the food but the social ostracism.

    I’m already the black sheep in my family—the anti-social shut-in whose quirks are laughed at on good days and resented on bad ones. If I imposed a vegan diet, I fear it would alienate me further, and I’d have to grovel my way back into some semblance of connection.

    As a lifelong neurotic who already alienates people more than I’d like, I know that repairing frayed relationships is an excruciating, arduous task. And it’s so inconvenient.

  • Rage-Bait Justice: How TV and Conspiracy Manufacture Vigilantes (A College Essay Prompt)

    Rage-Bait Justice: How TV and Conspiracy Manufacture Vigilantes (A College Essay Prompt)

    David Osit’s 2025 documentary Predators argues that the television series To Catch a Predator (2004–2007) trafficked in a sensational form of “rage bait”: staged ambushes, blurred safety protocols, and police tactics sacrificed to the show’s appetite for ratings. The program framed itself as public service, but its producers often prioritized spectacle over procedure, converting criminal justice into prime-time theater. Osit links this practice to a broader media phenomenon—rage bait—that rewards outrage, erodes critical thinking, and normalizes vigilantism and voyeurism. The same dynamics, we could argue, animate conspiracy entrepreneurs such as Alex Jones (see The Truth vs. Alex Jones): both convert moral panic into entertainment and profit, with corrosive effects on civic life.

    In a 1,700-word argumentative essay, evaluate the claim that treating criminality and conspiracy as spectacle—whether through To Catch a Predator or Alex Jones’s media operations—cultivates our worst impulses rather than our better angels. Using specific examples from both Predators and The Truth vs. Alex Jones and other reliable sources, analyze the ethical and civic consequences of rage bait in an attention economy

    Three sample thesis statements (with mapping components)

    Thesis 1 — Ethical-civic critique (best for moral analysis)
     Thesis: By converting crime and conspiracy into spectacle, both To Catch a Predator and Alex Jones manufacture moral panic and reward voyeuristic retribution; rather than fostering accountability, they degrade due process, incentivize unsafe policing practices, and train audiences to prefer outrage over inquiry.
    Map: (1) define “rage bait” and show how each case uses spectacle; (2) document procedural and ethical harms (policing compromises, doxxing, false beliefs); (3) analyze effects on civic habits (decline of deliberation, rise of vigilantism); (4) propose remedies (media ethics standards, platform governance, public media literacy).

    Thesis 2 — Psychological-manipulation frame (best for evidence-driven argument)
     Thesis: Rage-bait media—exemplified by To Catch a Predator and Alex Jones—exploits cognitive biases (moral outrage, availability heuristic, social proof) to increase engagement, and that manipulation converts viewers into amateur prosecutors and conspiracy enforcers, producing measurable social harms like harassment, miscarriages of public trust, and political polarization.
    Map: (1) summarize psychological mechanisms; (2) show how production choices trigger those biases in the two cases; (3) cite empirical consequences (harassment, wrongful accusations, erosion of trust); (4) recommend policy and audience-level interventions.

    Thesis 3 — Comparative-intent frame (best for nuanced balance)
     Thesis: While To Catch a Predator and Alex Jones both monetize outrage, they differ in intentionality and practical outcomes—one trafficked in staged public shaming with ambiguous law-enforcement complicity; the other peddles wholesale distrust—yet both converge in the same social result: normalizing spectacle as a substitute for justice and public reasoning.
    Map: (1) compare production intent and methods; (2) detail convergent harms despite different aims; (3) argue why intent does not absolve societal damage; (4) close with corrective measures that address both content creation and platform incentives.

    Three likely counterarguments and tight rebuttals

    Counterargument 1 — “They serve the public good: exposing predators / exposing lies.”
     Claim: Defenders argue To Catch a Predator and figures like Jones uncover dangerous people and warn the public—both perform watchdog functions that mainstream institutions neglect.
    Rebuttal: Exposure can be legitimate, but methods matter. When producers stage confrontations or flout safety protocols, they risk false positives, entrapment claims, and endangering both suspects and vigilante viewers. Similarly, Jones’s “exposés” often rely on unverified claims that harm innocents and erode trust in verified institutions; exposing wrongdoing while abandoning standards of verification is not accountability but sensationalism. Evidence-based journalism follows verification and respects due process; rage-bait substitutes spectacle for those constraints.

    Counterargument 2 — “Audience agency: viewers choose to watch—blame the audience for wanting spectacle.”
     Claim: Some say demand creates supply: if people didn’t tune in to outrage, producers wouldn’t supply it. Viewers are responsible for their choices.
    Rebuttal: Demand is shaped by supply. Media design and platform algorithms amplify outrage, reinforce confirmation bias, and make the extreme more visible. Moreover, many viewers do not have the media-literacy tools to parse staged setups or conspiratorial rhetoric. Responsibility therefore rests both with producers and with platforms that monetize attention; blaming passive viewers ignores the structural incentives that manufacture and magnify the spectacle.

    Counterargument 3 — “Different aims—public safety vs. entertainment—so comparison is unfair.”
     Claim: Critics argue the comparison collapses distinct categories: a sting operation aimed at child safety is not morally equivalent to a conspiracy show that pushes falsehoods.
    Rebuttal: Distinguishing aims matters, but consequences and methods matter more for public judgment. When public-safety rhetoric is deployed to justify theatrics—compromising police protocols for ratings—the boundary between service and spectacle disappears. Both enterprises monetize outrage, and both can cultivate a culture of punishment without procedure. Comparing them is not moral leveling so much as showing how different rationales can converge on the same harmful social model.

  • The Aesthetic Pharmaceutical Complex (a College Essay Prompt)

    The Aesthetic Pharmaceutical Complex (a College Essay Prompt)

    Write a 1,700-word argumentative essay that evaluates this claim: GLP-1 weight-loss drugs (e.g., Ozempic/Wegovy) offer a Faustian bargain–they blunt appetite and deliver rapid results, but at significant cultural, moral, and social costs. Examine whether these drugs simply cure an individual problem or whether they reshape appetite, pleasure, gender and marital dynamics, class inequality, body aesthetics, and personal agency in ways that should alarm us.

    Use Rebecca Johns (“A Diet Writer’s Regrets”), Johann Hari (“A Year on Ozempic…”), Harriet Brown (“The Weight of the Evidence”), Sandra Aamodt (“Why You Can’t Lose Weight on a Diet”), and at least two additional reputable sources of your choice. Address both sides: acknowledge the medical benefits (for diabetes, metabolic disease, disability reduction) while testing the claim that GLP-1s amount to a societal deal with the devil — trading desire, culinary culture, and autonomy for narrow aesthetic and market outcomes.

    Be sure to define terms (e.g., “Faustian bargain,” “GLP-1 drugs,” “body aesthetics”), offer evidence, and include a clear counterargument and rebuttal.

    Five Sample Thesis Statements (with mapping components)

    1. Thesis 1
       GLP-1 drugs are a Faustian bargain: they deliver rapid weight loss and metabolic benefit, but they also erode culinary pleasure, exacerbate social inequality, and replace disciplined habits with pharmaceutical dependence.
    • Mapping: (1) immediate medical and psychological benefits, (2) cultural costs to food and pleasure, (3) social/economic consequences and dependence.
    1. Thesis 2
       While GLP-1 medications can rescue lives in a clinical sense, their mainstreaming industrializes thinness—privileging aesthetics over health, amplifying economic divides, and outsourcing self-control to corporations and prescribers.
    • Mapping: (1) clinical life-saving benefits, (2) commercialization of body aesthetics, (3) economic and ethical fallout.
    1. Thesis 3
       GLP-1 drugs pose an ethical dilemma: they promise to erase cravings and curb addiction, but in doing so they risk flattening human desire, unsettling intimate relationships, and converting a public-health problem into a luxury aesthetic market.
    • Mapping: (1) pharmacological suppression of appetite, (2) impact on relationships and social life, (3) marketization and inequality.
    1. Thesis 4
       The rise of GLP-1s reframes weight management from moral failing to medicalized consumerism—undeniable benefits for some masked by troubling costs: cultural loss, shifting marital dynamics, and a dangerous dependence on biotech fixes.
    • Mapping: (1) medical reframing of obesity, (2) cultural and interpersonal costs, (3) risks of technological dependence.
    1. Thesis 5
       GLP-1 drugs give individuals the power to silence hunger, but that power comes tethered to troubling social outcomes: it amplifies privilege, intensifies pressure for aesthetic conformity, and weakens the role of habit and self-discipline in healthy living.
    • Mapping: (1) appetite suppression and individual gains, (2) exacerbation of aesthetic and class pressure, (3) erosion of habit-based agency.

    Counterargument (fair, strong):
     Proponents of GLP-1 drugs argue that calling them a “Faustian bargain” ignores the very real medical and social benefits these medications deliver. For many patients—especially those with type 2 diabetes, obesity-related hypertension, or mobility-limiting weight—GLP-1s reduce blood sugar, lower cardiovascular risk, and unlock functional gains that years of dieting could not. Early reports also show improvements in mood, self-efficacy, and social participation: when chronic hunger is quieted, people can exercise more, sleep better, and engage with life instead of being consumed by food preoccupation. From this perspective, the drugs restore agency rather than remove it; they are tools that expand options for people trapped by biology, food environments, and limited access to behavioral medicine. To label them morally corrosive risks stigmatizing patients who finally find relief.

    Rebuttal:
     That claim deserves respect—but it doesn’t dissolve the deeper social harms that mainstreaming GLP-1s threatens to produce. Medicine can relieve individual suffering while simultaneously reshaping culture in ways that reward aesthetic conformity and widen inequality: when a pharmaceutical becomes the fastest route to thinness, weight status shifts further from a health metric to a marketable badge of status, attainable first by those with money, time, and prescriber access. The drugs also substitute biochemical fixes for social solutions—affordable nutritious food, safer neighborhoods for exercise, workplace protections—that address root causes of metabolic disease; this medicalization risks absolving policymakers and corporations of responsibility. Finally, the long-term psychosocial costs are real: appetite suppression can blunt pleasure and disrupt food’s role as social glue, and couples who diverge in access to these drugs face novel tensions over desirability, divided resources, and identity. In short, GLP-1s can be miracles for patients; they can also be catalysts for cultural and economic shifts that deserve critical scrutiny before we call the bargain a fair trade.

  • Florida Fever Dreams and Katrina Floodwaters: Future Writing Prompts I Can’t Quit

    Florida Fever Dreams and Katrina Floodwaters: Future Writing Prompts I Can’t Quit

    I work obsessively hard to develop essay prompts for my college students. When they prove effective and resonate with the students, I am gratified beyond words and will keep the prompt for perhaps too long. I have an assignment about a diet writer Rebecca Johns who in her essay “A Diet Writer’s Regrets” explores the irony and misery of gaining weight while dispensing weight-loss tips in her women’s magazine articles. Her inability to execute her own advice becomes an opportunity for my students to explore the notion of free will when it comes to weight management, especially now that GLP-1 drugs are proving that dependence on technology can be so much more reliable than aspirations toward self-agency. The students’ essays over the last four semesters have been truly engaging, revealing either their own weight-management torment or a friend or family member’s. 

    One problem, though, with an essay prompt is that as it gets used semester after semester some of the essay components, such as the counterargument-rebuttal section, start looking the same. I suspect the previously written essays become in some form or other available to the new batch of students, and for this reason, I think even the best essay prompts have a limited shelf life. 

    Another challenge with creating essay prompts is that you don’t really know how they will land with the students until you actually try it out. For example, I was very enthusiastic about my freshman composition class’s first assignment in which they write about the crisis of young men who lack a sense of belonging and purpose and how in their vulnerable state they become vulnerable to the deceptions, manipulations, and false claims of bro influencers. We studied the Liver King who is said to have made over a hundred million dollars and in his caveman cosplay, he was simply too ridiculous and grotesque for my students–all athletes–to take him seriously. He proved so absurd that whatever gravitas I was trying to squeeze out of the assignment just felt like a joke. While millions of men followed their organ-eating cult leader, my athletes were not impressed, and I felt that my essay prompt suffered for it. As a result, I doubt I’ll do that one again.

    Looking ahead, I’m thinking of Florida as less of a physical place and more of a mental fever swamp where I can explore the notion of freedom in its immature and mature incarnations. The TV comedy series It’s Florida, Man and the documentary Some Kind of Heaven about a hedonistic senior citizen home could be an effective exploration of the perils of perpetual adolescence. To avoid making the essay prompt nihilistic, I am leaning toward a contrast essay in which the students explore a more healthy kind of freedom as Cal Newport advocates in his message of “deep work”–the idea that focused work is essential to flourishing and self-fulfillment. 

    Another topic that possesses me is Hurricane Katrina, the idea that a natural disaster was made into a man-made catastrophe through neglect and reckless disregard for the people of New Orleans. This ignominious chapter in American history is a powerful window into red-lining, government corruption, and media misinformation. The riveting documentaries Hurricane Katrina: Race Against Time (Hulu) and Katrina: Come Hell and High Water (Netflix) convince me that I will be exploring Hurricane Katrina next semester. 

    My challenge with Katrina is making sure the story doesn’t collapse into pure tragedy. To balance the devastation, I need to highlight the unique culture of New Orleans—the joy, the tight-knit families, the music, food, and resilience that define the city. The message I want to leave students with is that, despite catastrophe, New Orleans has a distinctive soul that continues to draw the world to its city.

    I suspect even after I retire in less than two years I will still sniff out writing prompts. Coming up with essay prompts is my addiction, and this addiction isn’t going away anytime soon. 

  • Adolescent Vs. Adult Freedom: College Essay Prompt

    Adolescent Vs. Adult Freedom: College Essay Prompt

    Introduction

    I find myself embarrassingly smitten with It’s Florida, Man on HBO Max, a six-episode documentary romp that most critics dismiss with a shrug. The Hollywood Reporter’s Daniel Fienberg summed it up with clinical indifference: “The premise is very straightforward. Each half-hour recounts a real-life mishap of the kind that helped Florida develop its national reputation as a meme in state form . . .”

    Fienberg is right about the meme, but he undersells the spectacle. Florida isn’t just weird—it’s a hallucinatory soup pot where the heat never turns down. A bubbling Bouillabaisse of runaways, con artists, half-baked dreamers, and humidity-pickled misfits; the broth gets richer, stranger, and more intoxicating by the hour. Novelists like Carl Hiaasen dip their ladles in and remind us with glee: “You couldn’t write this if you tried.” Comedian Marc Maron, who has roamed the continental madhouse, concurs: there is no asylum wing quite as deranged as the Sunshine State.

    The final episode, “Mugshot,” is my favorite. A wanted man from Pensacola turns into a social-media celebrity after his mugshot detonates across Instagram. The local police, suddenly auditioning for daytime television, turn their manhunt into a Jerry Springer-style circus, complete with suspect-shaming and moral squalor masquerading as civic duty. You couldn’t script it unless you were drunk, desperate, and willing to risk being fired by HBO for turning in satire disguised as reportage.

    As a college writing instructor, I confess I watch shows like this with an ulterior motive: I’m always looking for essay prompts hidden in the wreckage. It’s Florida, Man practically delivers one to my desk, gift-wrapped in neon: “Freedom and its Discontents.” Not the noble kind of freedom—what philosophers used to call “freedom for”—where self-discipline leads to self-agency, flourishing, and mastery, the Cal Newport variety of cultivated freedom. No, Florida, Man wallows in the basement: “freedom from.” Freedom from the Id, from restraint, from consequence, from sobriety. It’s Pleasure Island on a peninsula, and the longer you stay the faster your ears sprout into donkey ears, your voice degenerates into animal brays, and your dreams curdle into swamp gas.

    It’s Florida, Man isn’t just entertainment. It’s anthropology of the grotesque, a front-row ticket to America’s most unruly carnival, where freedom is mistaken for license and the monsters are very much real.

    With the background and this assignment’s origin story out of the way, let’s get to the writing prompt.

    The Assignment

    In a 1,700-word essay, your task is to address the following claim:  Cal Newport’s notion of “deep work” is an argument for adult freedom, which results in self-agency, happiness, and flourishing while It’s Florida, Man is a rebuke of adolescent freedom, showing the personal disintegration that results from living in a tropical fever dream where the unbridled Id reigns supreme. 

    Important Concepts to Understand for Your Essay:

    Adult Freedom in the Context of Deep Work

    In Deep Work, Cal Newport frames adult freedom as the disciplined ability to direct one’s attention toward meaningful, cognitively demanding tasks. For Newport, freedom isn’t the absence of restraint but the mastery of it: the deliberate cultivation of focus, the rejection of digital noise, and the channeling of energy into work that produces lasting value. This definition of freedom requires self-command, delayed gratification, and an acceptance that the mind must sometimes be trained against its immediate impulses. Adult freedom, then, is paradoxical: by constraining distraction and choosing rigor, one becomes more autonomous, more capable of shaping a life of purpose rather than drifting along on cultural currents.

    This vision stands in stark contrast to adolescent freedom, which is defined less by self-mastery than by the intoxication of doing whatever one pleases. It is the “freedom from” rather than “freedom for”: a pursuit of unbounded indulgence, of perpetual novelty, of a life with no guardrails. Adolescent freedom mistakes rebellion and impulse for liberation, when in reality it often leads to dependence, mediocrity, or even self-destruction. Where Newport’s adult freedom grows out of discipline and results in greater agency, adolescent freedom resists boundaries altogether, mistaking chaos for autonomy and mistaking license for liberation.

    Adolescent Freedom in the Context of It’s Florida, Man. 

    The HBO series It’s Florida, Man is essentially a case study in adolescent freedom run amok. Each episode parades a cast of misfits whose choices reflect “freedom from” responsibility rather than “freedom for” growth or virtue. Characters pursue impulse, chaos, and notoriety as if these were badges of independence. In one episode, a fugitive becomes a minor celebrity when his mugshot goes viral, and the spectacle escalates into a carnival of bad decisions—police exploiting fame, communities laughing at ruin, and the fugitive himself reveling in his fifteen minutes. This is adolescent freedom in its rawest form: the unchecked Id let loose in the swamps, mistaking recklessness for liberation.

    Adult freedom, by contrast, would require self-command, reflection, and purposeful direction—the very qualities absent in the fever dream of It’s Florida, Man. Where adult freedom cultivates discipline to expand genuine autonomy, adolescent freedom collapses into spectacle, chaos, and eventual self-destruction. The show becomes a cautionary tale: when freedom is stripped of responsibility, it ceases to empower and instead devours, leaving its practitioners transformed into caricatures or, in Newport’s terms, “donkeys on Pleasure Island.” By staging these spectacles, HBO doesn’t just entertain—it inadvertently dramatizes the gulf between the hollow thrill of adolescent license and the deeper, harder-won autonomy of adult freedom.

    Required Sources for Your Essay

    To support your essay, you will use the following:

    1. At least 3 episodes from It’s Florida, Man.  
    2. Cal Newport’s YouTube video: “Core Idea: Deep Work”
    3. Escaping Ordinary (B.C. Marx) YouTube video: “How to Build a Brain That Doesn’t Get Distracted.”
    4. Huberman Lab Clips YouTube video: “Avoiding Distractions & Doing Deep Work.”

    Prescribed Outline for Your Essay

    Paragraphs 1 and 2: Profile people you know who embody adolescent and adult freedom with vivid details. Each paragraph should be about 300 words. 

    Paragraph 3, your thesis: Address the following claim:  Cal Newport’s notion of “deep work” is an argument for adult freedom, which results in self-agency, happiness, and flourishing while It’s Florida, Man is a rebuke of adolescent freedom, showing the personal disintegration that results from living in a tropical fever dream where the unbridled Id reigns supreme. 

    Paragraphs 4-6: Analyze adolescent freedom by breaking it down into 3 major characteristics with salient examples.

    Paragraphs 7-9: Analyze adult freedom by breaking it down into 3 major characteristics with salient examples. 

    Paragraph 10: Write a powerful conclusion that underscores that it is urgent to understand the difference between adolescent and adult freedom. 

    Sample Thesis Statements with Mapping Components

    1. Straightforward, Clear Thesis
     Cal Newport’s Deep Work defines adult freedom as the disciplined ability to channel one’s attention toward meaningful work, while It’s Florida, Man dramatizes the collapse of adolescent freedom into chaos. Adult freedom is marked by discipline, purpose, and flourishing, while adolescent freedom is characterized by impulsiveness, spectacle, and eventual self-destruction.

    Mapping components:

    1. Adolescent freedom, as shown in It’s Florida, Man, is impulsive and reckless.
    2. Adolescent freedom thrives on spectacle and fleeting notoriety.
    3. Adolescent freedom often ends in self-destruction rather than liberation.
    4. Adult freedom, as defined in Deep Work, begins with self-discipline.
    5. Adult freedom aims toward meaningful purpose rather than distraction.
    6. Adult freedom results in flourishing and autonomy.

    2. Analytical & Nuanced Thesis
     While adolescent freedom promises limitless possibilities, It’s Florida, Man shows it devolving into chaos and dehumanization. In contrast, Cal Newport’s Deep Work frames adult freedom as a paradox: by imposing constraints on distraction, individuals gain the autonomy to flourish. The contrast between these two models reveals that true freedom lies not in the absence of rules but in the deliberate embrace of structure.

    Mapping components:

    1. Adolescent freedom rejects boundaries, mistaking chaos for autonomy.
    2. Adolescent freedom feeds on distraction, notoriety, and spectacle.
    3. Adolescent freedom leaves individuals diminished rather than empowered.
    4. Adult freedom requires disciplined focus and deliberate boundaries.
    5. Adult freedom transforms attention into purpose and meaning.
    6. Adult freedom produces self-agency and long-term flourishing.

    3. Provocative Thesis (for stronger student voices)
     It’s Florida, Man is more than cheap entertainment—it is a grotesque anthropology of what happens when adolescent freedom dominates: people mistake license for liberty and collapse into parody versions of themselves. Cal Newport’s Deep Work, however, insists that adult freedom emerges only through focus and discipline. Together, these texts reveal that our culture must choose between two freedoms: adolescent chaos that consumes us, or adult discipline that liberates us.

    Mapping components:

    1. Adolescent freedom exalts the Id: reckless pleasure, chaos, and notoriety.
    2. Adolescent freedom mistakes rebellion for liberation but breeds collapse.
    3. Adolescent freedom, when unchecked, dehumanizes individuals.
    4. Adult freedom demands restraint and cultivated attention.
    5. Adult freedom transforms constraint into autonomy and purpose.
    6. Adult freedom builds lasting agency and flourishing.

  • Pleasure Island with Humidity: My Obsession with It’s Florida, Man

    Pleasure Island with Humidity: My Obsession with It’s Florida, Man

    I find myself embarrassingly smitten with It’s Florida, Man on HBO Max, a six-episode documentary romp that most critics dismiss with a shrug. The Hollywood Reporter’s Daniel Fienberg summed it up with clinical indifference: “The premise is very straightforward. Each half-hour recounts a real-life mishap of the kind that helped Florida develop its national reputation as a meme in state form . . .”

    Fienberg is right about the meme, but he undersells the spectacle. Florida isn’t just weird—it’s a hallucinatory soup pot where the heat never turns down. A bubbling Bouillabaisse of runaways, con artists, half-baked dreamers, and humidity-pickled misfits; the broth gets richer, stranger, and more intoxicating by the hour. Novelists like Carl Hiaasen dip their ladles in and remind us with glee: “You couldn’t write this if you tried.” Comedian Marc Maron, who has roamed the continental madhouse, concurs: there is no asylum wing quite as deranged as the Sunshine State.

    The final episode, “Mugshot,” is my favorite. A wanted man from Pensacola turns into a social-media celebrity after his mugshot detonates across Instagram. The local police, suddenly auditioning for daytime television, turn their manhunt into a Jerry Springer-style circus, complete with suspect-shaming and moral squalor masquerading as civic duty. You couldn’t script it unless you were drunk, desperate, and willing to risk being fired by HBO for turning in satire disguised as reportage.

    As a college writing instructor, I confess I watch shows like this with an ulterior motive: I’m always looking for essay prompts hidden in the wreckage. It’s Florida, Man practically delivers one to my desk, gift-wrapped in neon: “Freedom and its Discontents.” Not the noble kind of freedom—what philosophers used to call “freedom for”—where self-discipline leads to self-agency, flourishing, and mastery, the Cal Newport variety of cultivated freedom. No, Florida, Man wallows in the basement: “freedom from.” Freedom from the Id, from restraint, from consequence, from sobriety. It’s Pleasure Island on a peninsula, and the longer you stay the faster your ears sprout into donkey ears, your voice degenerates into animal brays, and your dreams curdle into swamp gas.

    It’s Florida, Man isn’t just entertainment. It’s anthropology of the grotesque, a front-row ticket to America’s most unruly carnival, where freedom is mistaken for license and the monsters are very much real.

  • College Essay Prompt: Hurricane Katrina—Man-Made Catastrophe

    College Essay Prompt: Hurricane Katrina—Man-Made Catastrophe

    The story of Hurricane Katrina is not simply one of wind and water but of betrayal. The documentaries Hurricane Katrina: Race Against Time (Hulu) and Katrina: Come Hell and High Water (Netflix), along with Clint Smith’s essay “Twenty Years After the Storm” and Nicholas Lemann’s “Why Hurricane Katrina Was Not a Natural Disaster,” confront us with a grim truth: New Orleans, a city celebrated for its culture, music, and resilience, was devastated less by the storm itself than by the nation’s failure to protect its people.

    Through the voices of survivors, these works expose what might be called a fourfold sin: decades of red-lining that left poor Black neighborhoods especially vulnerable; government neglect that failed to strengthen levees or prepare for disaster; abandonment in the crucial days after the storm, when aid was sluggish and chaotic; and media defamation that painted survivors as looters rather than victims. Together, they suggest that Katrina was not just a natural disaster but a man-made catastrophe rooted in systemic racism, incompetence, and indifference.

    In a 1,700-word argumentative essay, take a clear position on the claim that Hurricane Katrina was less an act of nature than an act of national negligence. Your essay should:

    • Analyze how the films and essays portray the failures of government and institutions.
    • Consider how systemic issues (race, class, geography, and policy) compounded the disaster.
    • Explore how family, community, and cultural identity offered resilience when systems failed.
    • Use evidence from both documentaries and essays to develop your argument.

    Your goal is not just to summarize these sources but to engage critically with them, asking: What does it mean when a city is abandoned by its own country? What lessons does this catastrophe offer us about justice, resilience, and human dignity in the face of systemic failure?

    Sample Outline for Katrina Essay

    Thesis Statement:
     Hurricane Katrina was less a natural disaster than a man-made catastrophe, as decades of red-lining, government neglect, abandonment during the crisis, and media defamation amplified the storm’s destruction—yet amidst betrayal, the people of New Orleans revealed a code of resilience rooted in family, community, and cultural identity.

    Introduction (Paragraph 1)

    • Hook: vivid image of Katrina’s aftermath (rooftops, floodwaters, stranded families).
    • Background: films (Race Against Time, Come Hell and High Water) + essays (Clint Smith, Nicholas Lemann).
    • Transition: disaster reframed not as “natural” but as systemic failure.
    • Thesis (above).

    Body Paragraphs

    2. Historical Red-Lining and Vulnerability

    • Show how discriminatory housing policies left Black neighborhoods in flood-prone areas.
    • Use evidence from Lemann to explain how structural racism predetermined who would suffer most.

    3. Government Neglect Before the Storm

    • Weak levee systems and ignored warnings.
    • Films highlight repeated calls for reform that were dismissed.
    • Argue this negligence magnified the hurricane’s impact.

    4. Abandonment in the Storm’s Aftermath

    • FEMA’s failures and delayed military response.
    • Smith’s essay on families stranded without aid.
    • Link to systemic indifference toward vulnerable populations.

    5. Media Defamation and Public Perception

    • “Looters vs. survivors” narrative.
    • Racialized framing of desperation as criminality.
    • Analyze how defamation deepened the betrayal of victims.

    6. Katrina as Man-Made Catastrophe

    • Synthesize the “fourfold sin” into a coherent argument.
    • Emphasize how the storm was natural, but the disaster was political and systemic.

    7. Bonds of Family as Survival

    • Use Smith’s depictions of kinship.
    • Highlight family loyalty as a lifeboat of resilience.

    8. Community as Improvised Solidarity

    • Neighbors rescuing neighbors, churches as sanctuaries.
    • Films show grassroots resilience when official systems failed.

    9. Cultural Identity and Resilience

    • New Orleans’ unique culture—music, food, community pride—helped people endure.
    • Argue that culture is not superficial but a survival mechanism.

    10. Lessons for Justice and Human Dignity

    • What Katrina reveals about systemic racism, governmental accountability, and disaster response.
    • Extend argument: resilience is inspiring, but betrayal should never be normalized.

    Conclusion (Paragraph 11)

    • Restate thesis in fresh language.
    • Reflect on the paradox: beauty of resilience vs. shame of abandonment.
    • End with a call to remember New Orleans not as a drowned city but as proof of what solidarity and dignity look like when systems collapse.
  • Exit Stage Left: A Teacher’s Final Act

    Exit Stage Left: A Teacher’s Final Act

    I’m fewer than four semesters away from retirement—June 2027, the final curtain—and I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t scared. For nearly forty years I’ve worn the armor of a college classroom persona: bigger, bolder, more disciplined than the fragile, fumbling man who hides inside. Teaching gave me a stage and a referee’s whistle. Without it, who am I? Just the broken man-child without a supervisor, left to his own devices.

    During the pandemic, when colleagues were clawing to get out, I puffed out my chest and declared I was born ready for retirement. I pictured myself a disciplined Renaissance man: mornings at the piano, afternoons writing, evenings lifting kettlebells in the garage, book in hand before bed. A gilded schedule, as though I were independently wealthy. Now those boasts feel like hot air. Structure is one thing. The man animating that structure is another. In the classroom, the stakes were high: thirty pairs of eyes asking, Are you boring? Do you know what you’re talking about? The pressure kept me sharp, funny, and, occasionally, wise. No one lets you coast when you’re trapped under fluorescent lights for two hours with judgmental twenty-year-olds.

    Bitter irony: I’m leaving just as I finally got it right. It took me decades to balance theater with approachability, to drop the drill-sergeant persona that once scared students into silence, to actually build a classroom where people learned and laughed. Now I can scaffold essays like an architect and coax timid students into crafting arguments brick by brick. And just as the machinery is humming, I’m stepping offstage. Melancholy doesn’t begin to cover it.

    And then retirement makes you pay with loads of endless paperwork. Work forms that warn you that you cannot rescind your decision. Medicare forms with their cryptic alphabet soup (A, B, C, D), switching to my wife’s insurance, navigating private plans that read like IKEA instructions translated from Martian. I’ve joked I’d rather do faculty assessment reports than wrestle with retirement forms, and I meant it.

    Meanwhile, time itself heckles me. I’ll be sixty-four in six weeks. At my cousin’s seventy-fifth birthday, the guests—all seventysomethings—mingled like ghosts of futures to come. One cousin, seventy-eight, told me that old age makes you invisible. You still occupy space, but people’s eyes skip over you, as if you’re furniture. Old age is rude like that: the world resents you for hogging resources after your best years are spent. You should apologize for existing. Step aside, old man.

    So here I am, staring down a three-headed monster: paperwork, invisibility, and the slow evaporation of the job that kept me sane. What’s the plan? At six years old, I invented a companion—James, my imaginary friend. I’d knock on the apartment wall and tell my parents James wanted to play. They laughed, which only confirmed that James and I were onto something.

    Now, on the cusp of retirement, I feel his absence. Because when I think of retirement, I think of loneliness, and when I think of loneliness, I think of Gollum—squatting in the cave, muttering “precious” as he caresses the ring. Only for me, the ring isn’t a piece of jewelry. It’s youth. Precious, lost youth. I stroke it with nostalgia and curse it with bitterness. How dare people treat me like I’m invisible, when old age has taught me more than their Google searches ever will? And yet—I know this bitterness is the opposite of wisdom.

    So maybe I do need James back. But not the sweet, knock-on-the-wall James of childhood. I need James 2.0: a drill-sergeant life coach who will slap me across the face and bark: Stop whining. You’ve got love. You’ve got lights on in the house. You’re walking into retirement with more than most people ever dream of. Be grateful. And don’t you dare let this next chapter kick your ass.

  • When the Levees Broke, Love Held: Kinship and Trust as Survival Codes (A College Essay Prompt)

    When the Levees Broke, Love Held: Kinship and Trust as Survival Codes (A College Essay Prompt)

    Essay Prompt

    When Hurricane Katrina hit in August 2005, it wasn’t only a natural disaster; it was a test of the nation’s moral infrastructure. Hurricane Katrina: Race Against Time (Hulu) and Katrina: Come Hell and High Water (Netflix) lay bare a grim truth: while government agencies stumbled, delayed, or failed outright, it was ordinary people—families, neighbors, church groups, and communities—who often became the real lifelines of survival.

    This paradox deserves attention. Katrina exposed systemic abandonment: broken levees, collapsed evacuation plans, and botched relief efforts. Yet amid this neglect, stories emerged of neighbors carrying the elderly through floodwaters, families sharing scarce food, and communities improvising codes of loyalty and solidarity to keep one another alive. These grassroots responses were not bureaucratic; they were visceral, rooted in bonds of kinship, shared suffering, and a deep sense of responsibility to one another.

    The films reveal a cultural alchemy unique to New Orleans—where music, food, faith, and kinship traditions already wove people together. During Katrina, those traditions became lifeboats, not metaphorically but literally. In the absence of functioning institutions, families and neighbors reinvented survival itself, showing that human dignity doesn’t only exist in comfort or prosperity but can be forged in the crucible of catastrophe.

    Your Task: Write a 1,700-word essay analyzing how bonds of kinship and community loyalty functioned as lifeboats of survival in post-Katrina New Orleans.

    Address the following questions in your essay:

    • How did family love and neighborhood trust create improvised survival systems when formal institutions failed?
    • In what ways did communities create a code of resilience, a shared moral contract, during the disaster?
    • What lessons can be drawn from this improvisational solidarity about human dignity, loyalty, and the meaning of community in times of collapse?

    Your essay should balance analysis of the documentaries with close attention to human stories of resilience. Use specific examples and consider how these lessons apply beyond Katrina: What do they teach us about disaster, community, and the fragile but essential bonds that keep us human?

    Sample 9-Paragraph Outline

    Introduction (1 paragraph)

    • Hook: Paint the scene—abandoned streets, flooded houses, helicopters circling, and yet neighbors wading through water with makeshift rafts.
    • Context: Briefly note government failures highlighted in both documentaries (FEMA delays, stranded citizens, broken levees).
    • Thesis: Argue that when institutions collapse, kinship and neighborhood bonds become codes of resilience—informal but powerful lifeboats—that preserve human dignity, improvise survival, and reveal enduring truths about community loyalty in catastrophe.

    Body Paragraph 1: Government Collapse vs. Community Response

    • Detail FEMA delays, local government paralysis, and the abandonment felt by residents.
    • Contrast with ordinary people organizing rescues, distributing food, and opening their homes.
    • Set up the theme: resilience grows where systems fail.

    Body Paragraph 2: Families as First Responders

    • Show how families stayed together, sharing resources, protecting elders and children.
    • Examples from the films: families wading together through water, refusing to abandon one another.
    • Argue that love in the family unit became the most reliable “infrastructure” of survival.

    Body Paragraph 3: Neighbors as Kin

    • Explore how neighbors expanded the definition of family.
    • Community members who had never spoken before suddenly acted as protectors and caregivers.
    • This shows the elasticity of kinship: disaster stretches the definition of who counts as “family.”

    Body Paragraph 4: The Code of Resilience

    • Define the unwritten rules that emerged: share what you have, protect the vulnerable, don’t abandon your people.
    • These codes operated faster and more effectively than bureaucratic policies.
    • Examples: strangers pooling resources, neighborhood patrols against looters, churches as shelters.

    Body Paragraph 5: Improvisation as Survival Strategy

    • Show how ordinary people became engineers, medics, and rescuers.
    • Example: makeshift boats, rafts, and supply lines.
    • Connect to the broader point: resilience is not planned in a manual; it is improvised under pressure.

    Body Paragraph 6: Dignity Amid Despair

    • Explore how solidarity preserved dignity in dehumanizing conditions (Superdome chaos, flooded homes).
    • Argue that dignity comes not from institutions but from mutual recognition—neighbors affirming each other’s worth when society seems to have abandoned them.

    Body Paragraph 7: Lessons Beyond Katrina

    • Broaden the lens: how does this apply to future disasters (pandemics, climate change, social unrest)?
    • Argue that resilience depends less on bureaucracies than on the cultural strength of communities.
    • Point: family and community loyalty may be the last firewall against collapse.

    Body Paragraph 8: Counterargument & Rebuttal

    • Acknowledge critics: some argue neighbor-to-neighbor efforts were insufficient or uneven, that only systemic reform can prevent tragedy.
    • Rebuttal: While systemic change is essential, Katrina shows that human dignity cannot wait for bureaucratic rescue—it depends on immediate solidarity.

    Conclusion (1 paragraph)

    • Restate thesis: Katrina revealed abandonment but also exposed the cultural wealth of kinship and loyalty as lifeboats of survival.
    • End with a powerful image: in the floodwaters, where the state faltered, the human heart did not.
    • Call to action: value, protect, and invest in community bonds before the next disaster arrives.
  • The University as Hospice, the Gym as Cathedral

    The University as Hospice, the Gym as Cathedral

    In Jordan Castro’s scabrous novel Muscle Man, the protagonist, English professor Harold, concludes that the American university is dead. It’s only alive in a creepy, sad sort of way–zombification–manifest in online posts for events that no one goes to. These events are announced in emails as “exciting,” “excited,” and “please join.” No one joins. Other emails announce “calls to action,” and no one acts. They just remain lizard-eyed and stolid. These events are exercises in soul-crushing banality. Rather than a place to nurture young minds, the American university is so encumbered by bureaucratic speak and irrelevant, esoteric academic theories, it is an impotent institution and a graveyard where people go to die. 

    Perhaps Harold just needs a hug. Or perhaps he has cracked the code. He sees in the constant flood of college email announcements a desperate plea to be heard and to be irrelevant while being buried by its own fecklessness.

    The state of the college, especially the humanities, seems especially imperiled and moribund in the A.I. Age where students outsource writing, creativity, and “critical thinking” to machines and instructors are too feeble to stop the tsunami of these disrupting, revolutionary information and language tools.  

    As higher education looks more and more like a forlorn dinosaur and clings to stale identitarian platitudes and “progressive pedagogies” to cling to relevance, Harold surely must fret his own irrelevance and seek sanctuary in his bodybuilding dreams–curling iron as the cathedral of meaning and protein shakes as sacrament. In a world where the humanities have become the walking dead, at least the pump feels alive.