Cinemorphosis

Category: Education in the AI Age

  • The Warrior’s Code vs. the Sunken Place: How Frederick Douglass, Get Out, and Black Panther Illuminate the Moral Power of Bushido (College Essay Prompt)

    The Warrior’s Code vs. the Sunken Place: How Frederick Douglass, Get Out, and Black Panther Illuminate the Moral Power of Bushido (College Essay Prompt)

    Essay Prompt:
    In Frederick Douglass’ Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, the protagonist fights not only for freedom from physical slavery but for a reclamation of his identity and voice. In Get Out (dir. Jordan Peele), Chris Washington must escape a literal and psychological “Sunken Place”—a symbolic void of powerlessness, silencing, and racial objectification. In Black Panther (dir. Ryan Coogler), T’Challa and the people of Wakanda face a choice: remain isolated in comfortable superiority or courageously intervene in global struggles for justice. Across these three works, we encounter individuals and cultures confronting moral inertia and existential erasure.

    This essay asks you to consider the Bushido Warrior Code—with its emphasis on courage, loyalty, honor, and self-sacrifice—as a framework of moral resistance. How can Bushido function as a psychological, cultural, and ethical antidote to the Sunken Place—that metaphoric (and literal) realm where people are silenced, dehumanized, or seduced into passivity?

    Your task is to write a 1,700-word argumentative essay that explores how Douglass, Chris and Rod from Get Out, and Wakanda in Black Panther demonstrate that adopting a moral code like Bushido is essential to resisting oppression, reclaiming agency, and transforming society.

    Use close textual analysis, specific scenes, and well-supported reasoning. You are encouraged to include at least one counterargument—perhaps challenging whether Bushido fits all three stories—and offer a thoughtful rebuttal.

    Three Sample Thesis Statements

    1. Frederick Douglass, Chris Washington, and T’Challa all embody the Bushido Warrior Code through their courageous defiance of systems that attempt to silence and control them; by embracing loyalty, honor, and self-sacrifice, they resist the moral numbness of the Sunken Place and reclaim agency for themselves and their communities.
    2. Though Bushido originates in a different cultural context, the warrior code’s emphasis on ethical action and personal sacrifice provides a powerful framework to understand how Douglass, the heroes of Get Out, and Black Panther all triumph over forces that seek to render them passive, complicit, or invisible.
    3. The Sunken Place in Get Out is not limited to that film; it is a universal metaphor for psychological captivity. Through their pursuit of truth, dignity, and moral clarity, the protagonists in Douglass’ memoir and Black Panther reflect Bushido’s core principles, showing that only a warrior’s mindset can break the chains of silence and conformity.

    Definition of the Bushido Warrior Code (Relevant to Douglass, Get Out, and Black Panther):

    The Bushido Warrior Code is a moral and spiritual framework rooted in Japanese samurai tradition, demanding loyalty, courage, honor, and self-sacrifice in the face of injustice. In the context of Frederick Douglass, Chris Washington and Rod Williams from Get Out, and the Wakandan principles in Black Panther, Bushido can be redefined as the unflinching resolve to resist dehumanization, speak truth to power, and protect others—even at great personal risk.

    Douglass, once enslaved and denied his humanity, lived by a code of radical moral clarity: to reclaim his identity and liberate others through truth, intellect, and action. Chris’s escape from the Armitage estate—and Rod’s relentless pursuit to save him—embody Bushido’s call to act with bravery and loyalty against a system of manipulation and violence. In Black Panther, the leaders of Wakanda struggle between tradition and global responsibility, but T’Challa’s decision to share Wakanda’s resources to uplift oppressed communities aligns with Bushido’s ethic of using strength not for domination, but for justice.

    Thus, Bushido in this contemporary and intercultural context becomes the warrior’s vow to confront moral cowardice, challenge systems of oppression, and hold fast to integrity—even when the world offers comfort in exchange for silence.

    Suggested Outline

    I. Introduction (150–200 words)

    • Define the Bushido Warrior Code briefly (contextualized for this essay)
    • Introduce the idea of the “Sunken Place” as symbolic of dehumanization, passivity, and moral disengagement
    • Introduce the three works: Douglass’ memoir, Get Out, and Black Panther
    • Thesis statement: Make a clear argument about how Bushido operates as a moral antidote to the Sunken Place across all three works

    II. The Sunken Place: A Shared Metaphor for Oppression (200–250 words)

    • Define and analyze the literal and metaphorical meaning of the Sunken Place in Get Out
    • Briefly link this idea to Douglass’ experience of slavery and enforced ignorance
    • Connect to Wakanda’s early isolationism and Killmonger’s anger as signs of a fractured moral stance
    • Set up the argument that Bushido, or a similar moral code, offers a counter-force to this condition

    III. Frederick Douglass as a Bushido Warrior (300–350 words)

    • Discuss Douglass’ path from passive suffering to empowered resistance
    • Explore moments in the narrative that exemplify Bushido traits:
      • Courage (e.g., fighting Mr. Covey)
      • Honor (his pursuit of literacy as self-respect)
      • Loyalty (to his people and his mission, not the system that enslaved him)
    • Argue that Douglass reclaims his humanity and escapes the “Sunken Place” through an internal code of ethics

    IV. Get Out: Chris and Rod as Modern-Day Bushido Figures (300–350 words)

    • Analyze Chris’s slow awakening to the danger around him and his eventual decision to fight back
    • Highlight Rod’s unwavering loyalty and moral clarity—his refusal to give up on Chris
    • Argue that Chris’s violent escape is not just survival but a Bushido-like reclaiming of self-respect and autonomy
    • Explore how Peele dramatizes the moment Chris “rises” out of the Sunken Place—both literally and ethically

    V. Black Panther: Wakanda’s Ethical Crossroads and the Warrior Ideal (300–350 words)

    • Examine Wakanda’s moral dilemma: comfort through isolation vs. courage through engagement
    • Focus on T’Challa’s development—his shift from traditionalism to global responsibility
    • Consider the Dora Milaje as examples of Bushido: duty, honor, sacrifice
    • Argue that Wakanda’s decision to emerge and help others is a national application of Bushido ethics

    VI. Counterargument and Rebuttal (200–250 words)

    • Erik Killmonger presents a compelling counterargument to the Bushido Warrior Code by rejecting its emphasis on honor, restraint, and loyalty to tradition. For Killmonger, these values have failed the oppressed; they uphold systems that preserve power rather than challenge injustice. Unlike Bushido’s disciplined path of self-sacrifice for a noble cause, Killmonger pursues vengeance through domination and disruption. He sees mercy as weakness, diplomacy as delay, and tradition as complicity. His worldview is shaped by trauma and abandonment, and he believes liberation can only come through violent upheaval—not moral purity.
    • Yet this rage-fueled rejection of Bushido ultimately collapses under its own weight. While Killmonger is right to expose the moral cowardice of Wakanda’s past isolation, his scorched-earth tactics mirror the very oppression he seeks to destroy. The Bushido Code, properly understood, is not about submission to broken systems but about disciplined, courageous resistance grounded in honor. T’Challa’s evolution proves this: he learns from Killmonger’s challenge but rejects his methods, choosing instead to open Wakanda to the world and lead with strength and conscience. In doing so, T’Challa shows that true justice does not abandon moral codes—it transforms them to meet the moment.

    VII. Conclusion (150–200 words)

    • Restate the central claim: These three works show that resisting oppression requires not just escape, but ethical transformation
    • Reaffirm that Bushido, though ancient and foreign in origin, offers a moral blueprint for reclaiming agency in a dehumanizing world
    • End with a powerful thought or question: What happens when more people choose a warrior’s courage over the comfort of silence?
  • FOMO, Fantasy, and the Machinery of Manipulation: A College Essay Prompt

    FOMO, Fantasy, and the Machinery of Manipulation: A College Essay Prompt

    Analyzing FYRE and The Game Changers

    At first glance, FYRE: The Greatest Party That Never Happened and The Game Changers occupy two very different cultural arenas: one sells a fantasy of celebrity-soaked luxury on a tropical island; the other sells a utopia of plant-based athletic dominance. But both rely on the same invisible force: FOMO—Fear of Missing Out—to bypass skepticism, override critical thinking, and sell a seductive vision of who you could be.

    Whether it’s an exclusive influencer party or a miracle diet that promises power and peak performance, both documentaries expose how modern branding doesn’t just target wallets—it targets identity. These films demonstrate that FOMO isn’t a glitch in the persuasion system—it is the system.

    In a 1,700-word argumentative essay, respond to the following claim:

    FYRE and The Game Changers reveal that FOMO is a deliberate tool of manipulation, used to sell not just products or experiences, but entire identities. Through cinematic spectacle, influencer mythology, selective omission of facts, and emotional manipulation, both documentaries demonstrate how fear of being left out or left behind can be used to suppress critical thinking and turn aspiration into submission.

    Your task is to analyze how FOMO functions rhetorically in both films. You are not just describing the messages—they’re clear enough. You are interrogating how those messages are constructed, packaged, and delivered in ways that exploit emotional, cultural, and cognitive vulnerabilities.

    Themes to Consider:

    • FOMO as Psychological Pressure: How do these films manufacture urgency, envy, or insecurity to drive belief and behavior?
    • Influencer Culture and Manufactured Authority: How do the films use celebrities, athletes, and social media figures to create a sense of unassailable credibility?
    • Cinematic Manipulation: How do editing, music, lighting, testimonials, and pacing intensify the emotional appeal?
    • The Cult of Betterment: How is personal transformation framed not just as an option but a moral or social imperative?
    • Fantasy vs. Reality: What illusions are sold, and how are inconvenient truths hidden or glossed over?
    • Logical Fallacies and Propaganda Techniques:
      • Appeals to authority: Who is speaking, and why should we trust them?
      • Omission of facts: What’s conveniently left out to preserve the fantasy?
      • False cause, hasty generalization, slippery slope: Where does the argument jump logical tracks to maintain the illusion?

    Final Advice:

    This is not an essay about whether veganism works or whether luxury festivals are cool. It’s about how media uses FOMO and rhetorical sleight-of-hand to construct identities and sell illusions. Your job is to unpack the tactics, reveal the architecture of persuasion, and ask: what are we really buying when we buy into a dream?

    Here are three sample thesis statements and a detailed essay outline to accompany the revised prompt on FOMO, Fantasy, and the Machinery of Manipulation using FYRE and The Game Changers.

    Sample Thesis Statements:

    1. Thesis 1 – The Emotional Leverage Angle:
       FYRE and The Game Changers both manipulate audiences by leveraging FOMO to sell idealized versions of success and identity, using cinematic spectacle, authority bias, and selective omission to create illusions that prioritize emotional persuasion over logical coherence.
    2. Thesis 2 – The Propaganda Blueprint:
       Though vastly different in subject matter, FYRE and The Game Changers rely on the same propaganda playbook—omitting contradictory evidence, appealing to authority, and exploiting FOMO to craft fantasies of relevance, exclusivity, and self-optimization that suppress critical thinking.
    3. Thesis 3 – The False Promise of Transformation:
       By turning personal transformation into a cultural imperative, FYRE and The Game Changers reveal how modern media weaponizes FOMO and logical fallacies to promote the Cult of Betterment, ultimately offering not empowerment, but illusion.

    Sample Essay Outline:

    I. Introduction (200–250 words)

    • Hook: Describe a moment of FOMO-driven behavior (e.g., skipping sleep to buy into a trend, diet, or experience).
    • Introduce FYRE and The Game Changers as case studies in persuasive media.
    • Define FOMO as a manipulative tool—more than a side effect, it’s the delivery system.
    • Thesis statement: Choose one of the above or customize your own.

    II. FOMO as the Central Persuasive Strategy (300–350 words)

    • Define how FOMO functions in each film.
    • In FYRE: scarcity, exclusivity, influencer endorsements (you’re either in or invisible).
    • In The Game Changers: elite performance, longevity, masculinity, health—eat this way or fall behind.
    • Link back to emotional hijacking—how fear of inadequacy, irrelevance, or missing the next wave becomes the bait.

    III. Cinematic Manipulation and Visual Seduction (300–350 words)

    • Analyze how both films use editing, sound design, and selective storytelling to create atmosphere and urgency.
    • In FYRE: hyper-slick promo materials, tropical aesthetics, seductive influencer videos.
    • In Game Changers: slow-motion workouts, dramatic before/after testimonials, science-y graphics.
    • Emphasize how form serves fantasy—cinema is the sugar coating that makes the manipulation go down smooth.

    IV. Logical Fallacies and Omissions (350–400 words)

    • FYRE: Total omission of logistical and financial chaos from the promo content; “appeal to popularity” and “false cause” (this many influencers can’t be wrong!).
    • Game Changers: Hasty generalizations, cherry-picked science, appeal to authority via athletes and doctors with selective data.
    • Discuss what’s not shown: counter-evidence, contradictory studies, cost-benefit analysis, or nuance.
    • Show how omitting complexity creates the illusion of certainty and inevitability.

    V. The Cult of Betterment and Identity Construction (300–350 words)

    • Discuss how both films promote self-transformation not as a personal choice, but a necessity.
    • FYRE: Be the person who gets invited, who belongs.
    • Game Changers: Be the man who eats plants and squats 400 lbs—or you’re a relic.
    • Connect to broader cultural anxieties about relevance, masculinity, health, and success.
    • Highlight how FOMO becomes not just a fear of missing out, but a fear of not becoming.

    VI. Conclusion (200–250 words)

    • Reiterate the thesis in light of the analysis: persuasion is often disguised as empowerment.
    • Briefly reflect on what it means to consume media critically in a FOMO-driven culture.
    • Final insight: When identity is the product and attention is the currency, the most dangerous illusions are the ones we pay for willingly.
  • Brand Me, Break Me: The Confused User’s Guide to Digital Collapse (A College Essay Prompt)

    Brand Me, Break Me: The Confused User’s Guide to Digital Collapse (A College Essay Prompt)

    In addition to teaching Critical Thinking, I also teach Freshman Composition, and this semester I’m working with student-athletes—specifically, football players navigating the brave new world of NIL (Name, Image, Likeness) deals. These athletes are now eligible to make money from social media, which makes our first writing assignment both practical and perilous.

    Essay Prompt #1: Brand Me, Break Me: The Confused User’s Guide to Digital Collapse

    Social media is a business. Social media is also a drug. Sometimes, it’s both—and that’s when things get weird.

    In the docuseries Money Game, we watch college athletes play the algorithm like it’s just another playbook. They build brands, negotiate deals, and treat their social feeds like a revenue stream. Let’s call them Business Users—people who understand the game and are winning it.

    But then come the Dopamine Users, the rest of us poor souls, scrolling and posting not for profit, but for approval. In Black Mirror’s “Nosedive” and “Joan Is Awful,” we see social media mutate into a psychological carnival of rating systems, fake smiles, and avatars of self-worth. The result? A curated self that has nothing to do with reality and everything to do with anxiety, desperation, and an ongoing identity crisis.

    And then there’s the tragicomic third act: The Confused User. Think Untold: The Liver King. Here’s a guy who tried to be a Business User but collapsed into parody—lying, self-deluding, and publicly unraveling. The Confused User believes they’re optimizing for attention and success but ends up optimizing for ridicule and collapse.

    In this essay, use Money Game, “Nosedive,” “Joan Is Awful,” Untold: The Liver King, Jonathan Haidt’s essay “Why the Past 10 Years of American Life Have Been Uniquely Stupid,” and Sherry Turkle’s TED Talk “Alone, but Connected?” to respond to the following claim:

    Social media can be a profitable business tool—but when it becomes a substitute for self-worth, it guarantees isolation, mental illness, and eventual collapse. Understanding the difference between Business Users, Dopamine Users, and Confused Users may be the only way to survive the algorithm without losing your mind.

    You may agree, partially agree, or disagree with the claim—but either way, take a position with clarity and nuance. Analyze the psychology, the economics, and the wreckage.

    And remember: this is a critical thinking exercise. That means no TikTok therapy takes, no AI-generated summaries, and no mushy conclusions. Think hard, argue well, and—above all—write like someone who’s seen the glitch in the matrix.

    Sample Thesis Statements:

    1. While social media offers entrepreneurial opportunities for Business Users, the vast majority of people are Dopamine Users unknowingly trading mental stability for validation, making the platform a psychological trap disguised as empowerment.
    2. The Confused User, exemplified by the Liver King, represents a cautionary tale in the digital economy: when brand-building and identity collapse into one, social media success becomes indistinguishable from self-destruction.
    3. Social media doesn’t inherently damage us—but without a clear distinction between economic strategy and personal validation, users risk becoming Confused Users whose craving for attention leads not to fame, but to ruin.

    In a world where your Instagram handle might carry more currency than your GPA, this isn’t just an academic exercise—it’s a survival guide. Whether you’re gunning for a sponsorship deal or just trying not to lose your sense of self in the scroll, this essay is your chance to interrogate the game before it plays you. Treat it like film study for the algorithm: read the plays, understand the players, and figure out how to stay human in a system designed to monetize your attention and, if you’re not careful, your identity.

  • The Composition Apocalypse: How AI Ate the Syllabus

    The Composition Apocalypse: How AI Ate the Syllabus

    We’ve arrived at the third and final essay in this course, and the gloves are off.

    Just as GLP-1 drugs are transforming eating—from pleasure to optimization—AI is transforming writing. That’s not speculation; it’s the new syllabus. We’re witnessing the great extinction event of the traditional writing process. Drafting, revising, struggling with a paragraph like it’s a Rubik’s Cube in the dark? That’s quaint now. The machines are here, and they’re fast, fluent, and disarmingly coherent.

    Meanwhile, college writing programs are playing catch-up while the bots are already teaching themselves AP Composition. If we want writing instructors to remain relevant (i.e., not replaced by a glowing terminal that says “Rewrite?”), we’ll need to reimagine our role. The new instructor is less grammar cop, more rhetorical strategist. Part voice coach, part creative director, part ethicist.

    Your task:
    Write a 1,700-word argumentative essay responding to this claim:
    To remain essential in the Age of AI, college writing instruction must evolve from teaching students how to write to teaching students how to think—critically, ethically, and strategically—alongside machines.

    Consider how AI is reprogramming the writing process and what we must do in response:

    • Should writing classes teach AI prompt-crafting instead of thesis statements?
    • Will rhetorical literacy and moral clarity become more important than knowing where to put a semicolon?
    • Should students learn to turn Blender into a rhetorical tool—visualizing arguments as 3D structures or spatial infographics?
    • Will gamification and multimodal projects replace the five-paragraph zombie essay?
    • Are writing studios the future—dynamic, collaborative AI-human spaces where “How well can you prompt?” becomes the new “How well can you argue?”

    In short, what must the writing classroom become when the act of writing itself is no longer uniquely human?

    This prompt doesn’t ask you to mourn the old ways. It demands that you architect the new ones. Push past nostalgia and imagine what a post-ChatGPT curriculum might look like—not just to survive the AI onslaught, but to lead it.

  • Soylent Nation: The Death of Food and the Rise of Optimization

    Soylent Nation: The Death of Food and the Rise of Optimization

    If our first essay examined how GLP-1 drugs alter our humanity by suppressing hunger, our second essay takes us deeper into the culinary uncanny valley—where food, as we’ve known it for millennia, is quietly vanishing. In its place? “Foodstuffs”—a sterile word for whatever futuristic slop keeps our bodies upright and insurance premiums low.

    Here’s the prompt:
    GLP-1 drugs like Ozempic are already dulling the primal scream of hunger, while artificial intelligence promises to spoon-feed us algorithmically tailored, nutrient-optimized meals. Together, these forces threaten to end food as a sensory, emotional, and cultural experience. In its place: hyper-efficient eating designed for health metrics, economic survival, and corporate convenience.

    Write a 1,700-word argumentative essay that responds to the following claim:
    We are shifting from being Pleasure Creatures who gather, share, and celebrate food to Optimized Creatures—pharmaceutically sedated, algorithmically fed, and culturally detached from eating as anything but fuel.

    In your response, examine both the promises and the perils of this transformation. What’s gained in the name of longevity, affordability, and controlled weight? What’s lost when shared meals, sensual pleasure, and culinary identity are reduced to biometric feedback and calorie quotas?

    Also consider this grim possibility: What if the Optimized future isn’t a choice? What if remaining a Pleasure Creature means disqualifying yourself from affordable health care, workplace perks, or state-sponsored insurance? Can anyone really resist this transition when optimization becomes not just encouraged but economically mandated?

    You’re not here to write a dystopian novel or a eulogy for artisanal bread. You’re here to think critically. Engage with nuance. Acknowledge contradictions. If your reader finishes your essay feeling uncomfortable, you’re probably doing something right.

  • The Hunger Games: GLP-1, Free Will, and the Price of Thin

    The Hunger Games: GLP-1, Free Will, and the Price of Thin

    In my Critical Thinking course, we tackle three research-based essays that wrestle with one central, disquieting premise: technology is not just helping us live—it’s rewriting what it means to be human. Our first unit? A polite but pointed takedown of the American weight loss gospel. The assignment is called The Aesthetic Industrial Complex, and it asks students to write a 1,700-word argumentative essay exploring a question that’s fast becoming unavoidable: Does the old moral framework of discipline, kale, and “personal responsibility” still hold water in the age of GLP-1 injections, food-delivery algorithms, and weaponized Instagram bodies?

    We dive into the stories of good-faith dieters—folks who’ve counted calories, logged cardio, avoided sugar like it was plutonium—and still watched their doctors frown over charts lit up with prediabetes, high blood pressure, and the telltale signs of metabolic collapse. These are not cases of vanity. These are mandates from cardiologists and endocrinologists. Lose weight or lose time.

    Enter the needle. GLP-1 drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy promise what decades of dieting books never delivered: chemical satiety and the end of food noise—that constant mental hum that turns the pantry into a siren song. The results are seismic: hunger down, weight down, cravings down, existential questions up.

    Because here’s the paradox: when food no longer seduces us, we gain a body that’s marketable and medically optimized—but we lose something else. Food is not just fuel. It’s ritual. It’s celebration. It’s Grandma’s lasagna, a first date over sushi, a kitchen filled with the smell of garlic. Food is culture, memory, and soul. And yet, being ruled by it? That’s a kind of servitude. Constant hunger is its own form of imprisonment.

    So we’re caught in a new paradox: to be free from food, we must become dependent on pharmacological salvation. Health insurers love it. Employers love it. Actuarial tables are singing hymns of praise. But should we?

    That’s the real assignment: not just whether GLP-1s work, but whether the shift they represent is something to embrace or fear. This is no clear-cut debate. It’s a riddle with contradictory truths. A tug-of-war between biology, economics, ethics, and the shrinking silhouette in the mirror.

    And if my students groan under the weight of the question, I remind them: this isn’t Home Ec. This is Critical Thinking. If you want easy answers, go back to diet TikTok.

  • The Rebranding of College Writing Instructors as Prompt Engineers

    The Rebranding of College Writing Instructors as Prompt Engineers

    There’s a cliché I’ve sidestepped for decades, the kind of phrase I’ve red-penned into oblivion in freshman essays. But now, God help me, I must say it: I see the handwriting on the wall. And it’s written in 72-point sans serif, blinking in algorithmic neon.

    I’ve taught college writing for forty years. My wife, a fellow lifer in the trenches, has clocked twenty-five teaching sixth and seventh graders. Between us, we’ve marked enough essays to wallpaper the Taj Mahal. And yet here we are, staring down the barrel of obsolescence while AI platforms politely tap us on the shoulder and whisper, “We’ve got this now.”

    Try crafting an “AI-resistant” assignment. Go ahead. Ask students to conduct interviews, keep journals, write about memories. They’ll feed your prompt into ChatGPT with the finesse of a hedge fund trader moving capital offshore. The result? A flawlessly ghostwritten confession by a bot with a stunning grasp of emotional trauma and a suspicious lack of typos.

    Middle school teachers, my wife says, are on their way to becoming glorified camp counselors with grading software. As for us college instructors, we’ll be lucky to avoid re-education camps dressed up as “professional development.” The new job? Teaching students how to prompt AI like Vegas magicians—how to trick it into coherence, how to interrogate its biases, how to extract signal from synthetic noise. Critical thinking rebranded as Prompt Engineering.

    Gone are the days of unpacking the psychic inertia of J. Alfred Prufrock or peeling back the grim cultural criticism of Coetzee’s Disgrace. Now it’s Kahoot quizzes and real-time prompt battles. Welcome to Gamified Rhetoric 101. Your syllabus: Minecraft meets Brave New World.

    At sixty-three, I’m no fool. I know what happens to tired draft horses when the carriage goes electric. I’ve seen the pasture. I can smell the industrial glue. And I’m not alone. My colleagues—bright, literate, and increasingly demoralized—mutter the same bitter mantra: “We are the AI police. And the criminals are always one jailbreak ahead.”

    We keep saying we need to “stop the bleeding,” another cliché I’d normally bin. But here I am, bleeding clichés like a wounded soldier of the Enlightenment, fighting off the Age of Ozempification—a term I’ve coined to describe the creeping automation of everything from weight loss to wit. We’re not writing anymore; we’re curating prompts. We’re not thinking; we’re optimizing.

    This isn’t pessimism. It’s clarity. And if clarity means leaning on a cliché, so be it.

  • Trapped in the AI Age’s Metaphysical Tug-of-War

    Trapped in the AI Age’s Metaphysical Tug-of-War

    I’m typing this to the sound of Beethoven—1,868 MP3s of compressed genius streamed through the algorithmic convenience of a playlist. It’s a 41-hour-and-8-minute monument to compromise: a simulacrum of sonic excellence that can’t hold a candle to the warmth of an LP. But convenience wins. Always.

    I make Faustian bargains like this daily. Thirty-minute meals instead of slow-cooked transcendence. Athleisure instead of tailoring. A Honda instead of high horsepower. The good-enough over the sublime. Not because I’m lazy—because I’m functional. Efficient. Optimized.

    And now, writing.

    For a year, my students and I have been feeding prompts into ChatGPT like a pagan tribe tossing goats into the volcano—hoping for inspiration, maybe salvation. Sometimes it works. The AI outlines, brainstorms, even polishes. But the more we rely on it, the more I feel the need to write without it—just to remember what my own voice sounds like. Just as the vinyl snob craves the imperfections of real analog music or the home cook insists on peeling garlic by hand, I need to suffer through the process.

    We’re caught in a metaphysical tug-of-war. We crave convenience but revere authenticity. We binge AI-generated sludge by day, then go weep over a hand-made pie crust YouTube video at night. We want our lives frictionless, but our souls textured. It’s the new sacred vs. profane: What do we reserve for real, and what do we surrender to the machine?

    I can’t say where this goes. Maybe real food will be phased out, like Blockbuster or bookstores. Maybe we’ll subsist on GLP-1 drugs, AI-tailored nutrient paste, and the joyless certainty of perfect lab metrics.

    As for entertainment, I’m marginally more hopeful. Chris Rock, Sarah Silverman—these are voices, not products. AI can churn out sitcoms, but it can’t bleed. It can’t bomb. It can’t riff on childhood trauma with perfect timing. Humans know the difference between a story and a story-shaped thing.

    Still, writing is in trouble. Reading, too. AI erodes attention spans like waves on sandstone. Books? Optional. Original thought? Delegated. The more AI floods the language, the more we’ll acclimate to its sterile rhythm. And the more we acclimate, the less we’ll even remember what a real voice sounds like.

    Yes, there will always be the artisan holdouts—those who cook, write, read, and listen with intention. But they’ll be outliers. A boutique species. The rest of us will be lean, medicated, managed. Data-optimized units of productivity.

    And yet, there will be stories. There will always be stories. Because stories aren’t just culture—they’re our survival instinct dressed up as entertainment. When everything else is outsourced, commodified, and flattened, we’ll still need someone to stand up and tell us who we are.

  • College Essay Prompt: Your Brand, Your Legacy: How to Influence Without Selling Out

    College Essay Prompt: Your Brand, Your Legacy: How to Influence Without Selling Out

    Assignment Overview:

    In the NIL era, athletes are no longer just players—they’re entrepreneurs, role models, and public figures. The rise of influencer culture gives you the power to shape your own brand, connect with fans, and earn money. But with that power comes pressure: How do you stay real while staying relevant? How do you build your platform without becoming a product?

    In the Money Game docuseries, LSU gymnast Olivia Dunne models a smart, sustainable approach to NIL: blending athletic performance, personality, and professionalism. In contrast, the Netflix documentary Untold: The Liver King tells the story of Brian Johnson—a man who built an extreme, hyper-masculine fitness brand only to fall hard after revealing he built his image on steroids and deception.

    In this essay, you will write a “how-to manual” for student-athletes trying to build an ethical, authentic, and effective personal brand. Your argument should clearly explain what works, what doesn’t, and why. Use Olivia Dunne as a model of smart influencer strategy, the Liver King as a cautionary tale, and at least one additional athlete (from the reading list or your own research) as a supporting case study.

    Your Goals in This Essay:

    • Teach readers how to build a responsible and sustainable NIL brand
    • Compare successful and failed influencer strategies
    • Reflect on how an athlete can balance real identity with public image
    • Take a clear stance on what makes influencer branding admirable, ethical, and long-lasting

    Essay Requirements:

    • MLA format (12-point font, double-spaced, proper citations)
    • 8 paragraphs: introduction, 6 body paragraphs, conclusion
    • At least two credible sources (see the reading list or find your own)
    • In-text citations and a Works Cited page
    • A focused, argumentative thesis (not just “influencing is good/bad”)
    • Use specific examples and clear reasoning

    Suggested 8-Paragraph Outline:

    1. Introduction
      • Hook: Ask a question or tell a quick story about athlete fame or social media fame
      • Context: Briefly define NIL and explain how it has changed college athletics
      • Thesis: State your core advice—what makes an NIL brand ethical, effective, and worth following
    2. Lesson #1: Be Real, Not Just Visible
      • Use Dunne’s example to show the power of authenticity and athletic credibility
      • Contrast with the Liver King’s persona-based deception
    3. Lesson #2: Align Your Brand with Who You Are
      • Use a secondary case study (e.g., Shedeur Sanders or Chase Griffin)
      • Show how a values-based brand creates trust and long-term appeal
    4. Lesson #3: Build for the Long Run, Not Just for Likes
      • Talk about long-term goals vs. short-term popularity
      • Emphasize how transparency and substance protect your legacy
    5. Lesson #4: Know the Game—You’re a Business, Not Just a Feed
      • Explain the importance of smart partnerships, content quality, and self-discipline
      • Compare thoughtful NIL deals with hype-based gimmicks
    6. Lesson #5: The Spotlight Is Hot—Know the Risks
      • Social media can bring opportunity and scrutiny
      • One bad post or fake partnership can harm your name
      • Tie back to broader trends in sports culture
    7. Counterargument + Rebuttal
      • Acknowledge: some believe shock and virality are the fastest way to fame
      • Rebut: real influence lasts longer than a trend, and fake personas crack under pressure
    8. Conclusion
      • Restate your thesis about how to build a brand that reflects who you are
      • Leave readers with advice: if a younger athlete asked you for NIL advice, what would you say?

    Companion Reading List

    1. [“How Marketers Choose College Athlete Influencers” – Harvard Business Review](https://hbr.org/2024/05/how-marketers-choose-college-athlete-influencers)

    Overview: This article delves into the criteria marketers use to select college athletes for NIL deals, emphasizing authenticity, engagement, and brand alignment.

    2. [“College Athletes Are Now Online Influencers, Too” – Global Sport Matters](https://globalsportmatters.com/business/2023/02/08/whole-different-audience-college-athletes-online-influencers-too/)

    Overview: Explores the dual identity of college athletes as both competitors and influencers, highlighting the opportunities and challenges of this new landscape.

    3. [“How NIL Deals and Brand Sponsorships Are Helping College Athletes Make Money” – Business Insider](https://www.businessinsider.com/how-college-athletes-are-getting-paid-from-nil-endorsement-deals)

    *Overview:* Provides a comprehensive look at the financial aspects of NIL deals, including the role of collectives and the varying scales of athlete earnings.([MarketWatch][1])

    4. [“Livvy Dunne Dishes on Her Social Media Strategy” – On3](https://www.on3.com/college/lsu-tigers/news/livvy-dunne-dishes-on-her-social-media-strategy-how-she-handles-rabid-fans/)

    *Overview:* Offers insights into Olivia Dunne’s approach to managing her online presence, balancing personal branding with athletic commitments.

    5. [“The Top 10 NIL Influencers To Follow On Social Media” – Viral Nation](https://www.viralnation.com/resources/blog/top-10-nil-influencers-of-2022)

    Overview: Highlights standout college athletes who have effectively leveraged social media for NIL opportunities, providing case studies of successful strategies.

    —

    College Football Players Exemplifying Savvy Social Media Use

    1. Shedeur Sanders (University of Colorado)

    Overview: Son of NFL legend Deion Sanders, Shedeur has cultivated a strong personal brand through consistent social media engagement, showcasing his on-field performance and off-field personality. His strategic use of platforms has led to significant NIL deals, making him one of the top earners among college athletes.([talkSPORT][2])

    2. Chase Griffin (UCLA)

    Overview: Recognized as a two-time NIL Male Athlete of the Year, Griffin has combined academic excellence with a thoughtful social media presence. He uses his platforms to discuss topics beyond football, including education and social issues, aligning with brands that reflect his values.

    3. Michael Turk (Oklahoma)

    Overview: Through his YouTube channel “Hangtime,” Turk shares content that blends athletic training, personal faith, and lifestyle topics. His authentic storytelling and engagement have attracted a substantial following, enhancing his marketability for NIL partnerships.([Wikipedia][3])

    4. Hendon Hooker (University of Tennessee)

    Overview: Hooker has utilized his platform to promote positive messages, including co-authoring a children’s book that combines sports themes with life lessons. His commitment to community engagement and personal development resonates with audiences and sponsors alike.([Wikipedia][4])

    5. Jaden Rashada (Arizona State University)

    Overview: As one of the first high school athletes to sign an NIL deal, Rashada has been at the forefront of athlete branding. His proactive approach to building a personal brand sets a precedent for upcoming athletes navigating the NIL landscape.([Wikipedia][5])

    [1]: https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-10-college-athletes-are-making-over-1-million-a-year-in-nil-deals-203649d7?utm_source=chatgpt.com “These 10 college athletes are making over $1 million a year in NIL deals”

    [2]: https://talksport.com/us/2066573/livvy-dunne-top-nil-deals-shedeur-sanders-college/?utm_source=chatgpt.com “Livvy Dunne has $4m NIL fortune but it’s a trailblazing quarterback who tops college list”

    [3]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Turk?utm_source=chatgpt.com “Michael Turk”

    [4]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hendon_Hooker?utm_source=chatgpt.com “Hendon Hooker”

    [5]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaden_Rashada?utm_source=chatgpt.com “Jaden Rashada”

    10 Dos and Don’ts of Athletic Social Media Branding

    1. DO show your work ethic.

    Post training clips, game-day prep, recovery routines, and behind-the-scenes discipline. You’re not just flexing muscles—you’re broadcasting your commitment.

    DON’T just flex your abs.
     A shirtless selfie with no context screams vanity, not value. You’re not auditioning for a thirst trap Olympics.

    2. DO engage with your audience.

    Reply to comments, answer questions, and create polls or stories that invite fans into your world.

    DON’T buy followers or fake engagement.
     It’s obvious. It’s embarrassing. And brands can tell.

    3. DO be authentic.

    Speak in your voice. Share your story—wins, losses, doubts, comebacks. Fans connect with real people, not curated robots.

    DON’T mimic influencers who aren’t athletes.
     You’re not a fitness model or a supplement shill—unless you want to be irrelevant in two years.

    4. DO collaborate with brands that match your values.

    If you believe in a product, use it, and can explain why, that’s a partnership—not a transaction.

    DON’T promote sketchy products or fad diets.
     One bad NIL deal can wreck your reputation. If it sounds like snake oil, it probably is.

    5. DO use high-quality visuals.

    Good lighting, steady framing, and thoughtful captions go a long way. Even a smartphone can create pro-level content now.

    DON’T post blurry, off-angle, or half-baked content.
     You’re not in a group chat. You’re building a portfolio.

    6. DO tell a story.

    Whether it’s a comeback from injury, a day-in-the-life, or your pregame rituals—narrative builds loyalty.

    DON’T just post random hype clips with rap beats.
     Unless there’s context, all we see is ego and noise.

    7. DO highlight your education and character.

    Brands—and future employers—like athletes with brains, purpose, and integrity. Show that you’re more than a stat sheet.

    DON’T trash talk, subtweet, or complain.
     Screenshots are forever. Emotionally tweet like you’re already in the NFL.

    8. DO maintain consistency.

    Post regularly, even during the offseason. That’s when the real connections are made.

    DON’T ghost your audience.
     Going silent for months makes it look like you only post when you’re winning.

    9. DO respect team rules and brand guidelines.

    If you’re repping a university or sponsor, know the line between personal and professional content.

    DON’T leak locker room drama.
     One bad post can get you benched, dropped, or worse—memed into oblivion.

    10. DO think long-term.

    Use social media to build a bridge to life after football—whether it’s coaching, media, business, or beyond.

    DON’T tie your entire identity to performance.
     Your value isn’t just in touchdowns. Build a brand that lasts longer than your playing career.

  • Medicine Ball Confessional: A Garage Epiphany

    Medicine Ball Confessional: A Garage Epiphany

    Medicine Ball Rapid Squats with Explosions—yes, actual liftoff, feet airborne like a NASA launch—have officially dethroned the stationary bike as my cardio weapon of choice. For sixty glorious, self-inflicted minutes, I was drenched in blissful sweat, hurling that rubber orb like it owed me money. Then came the aftermath: fatigue so pure and existential I could hear the clock ticking on my lifespan. I collapsed into a nap with the urgency of a man dodging the Grim Reaper.

    Now? I’m upright. Serene. Humbled. Prepping to teach a class on Ozempification, AI, and the slow, clinical death of food culture. The brain is willing, the PowerPoint is ready—but spiritually, I’m still in the garage, shirtless and heaving, chasing glory with kettlebells and a medicine ball like a 63-year-old Olympic hopeful with a PhD in futility.

    I don’t know what compels me to train this hard. Maybe it’s defiance. Maybe it’s denial. Some hybrid of Rocky Balboa and Hamlet. Either way, this zeal is a strange cocktail of vitality and panic. I hope it’s health. But I’d be lying if I said it didn’t reek, just a little, of desperation. Then again—what is passion, if not a dignified form of flailing against the void?