Cinemorphosis

The Algorithm Always Wins: How Black Mirror’s “Joan Is Awful” Turns Self-Reinvention Into Self-Erasure: A College Essay Prompt

Written by

Jeffrey McMahon

in

Here’s a complete essay assignment with a title, a precise prompt, a forceful sample thesis, and a clear 9-paragraph outline that invites students to think critically about Black Mirror’s “Joan Is Awful” as a cautionary tale about the illusion of self-reinvention in the age of algorithmic control.

Essay Prompt:

In Black Mirror’s “Joan Is Awful,” the protagonist believes she is taking control of her life—switching therapists, reconsidering her career, changing her relationship—but these gestures of so-called self-improvement unravel into a deeper entrapment. Write an essay in which you argue that Joan is not reinventing herself, but rather surrendering her privacy, dreams, and identity to a machine that thrives on mimicry, commodification, and total surveillance. How does the episode reveal the illusion of agency in digital spaces that promise self-empowerment? In your response, consider how algorithmic platforms blur the line between self-expression and self-abnegation.

Sample Thesis Statement:

In Joan Is Awful, Joan believes she is taking control of her life through self-reinvention, but she is actually submitting to an algorithmic system that harvests her identity and turns it into exploitable content. The episode exposes how digital platforms market the fantasy of personal transformation while quietly demanding the user’s total surrender—of privacy, agency, and individuality—in what amounts to a bleak act of self-erasure disguised as empowerment.

9-Paragraph Outline:

I. Introduction

  • Hook: In today’s digital economy, the idea of “reinventing yourself” is everywhere—but what if that reinvention is a trap?
  • Introduce Black Mirror’s “Joan Is Awful” as a satirical take on algorithmic surveillance and performative identity.
  • Contextualize the illusion of self-improvement through apps, platforms, and AI.
  • Thesis: Joan’s journey is not one of self-reinvention but of self-abnegation, as she becomes raw material for a system that rewards data extraction over authenticity.

II. The Setup: Joan’s Belief in Reinvention

  • Joan wants to change: new therapist, new boundaries, hints of dissatisfaction with her job and relationship.
  • Her attempts reflect a desire to reshape her identity—to be “better.”
  • But these changes are shallow and reactive, already shaped by her algorithmic footprint.

III. The Trap is Already Set

  • Joan’s reinvention is instantly co-opted by the Streamberry algorithm.
  • The content isn’t about who Joan is—it’s about how she can be used.
  • Her life becomes a simulation because she surrendered her terms of use.

IV. Privacy as the First Casualty

  • Streamberry’s access to her phone, apps, and data is total.
  • The idea of “opting in” is meaningless—Joan already did, like most of us, without reading the fine print.
  • The show critiques how we confuse visibility with empowerment while forfeiting privacy.

V. Identity as Content

  • Joan becomes a character in her own life, performed by Salma Hayek, whose image has also been commodified.
  • Her decisions no longer matter—the machine has already decided who she is.
  • The algorithm doesn’t just reflect her—it distorts her into something more “engaging.”

VI. The Illusion of Agency

  • Even when Joan rebels (e.g., the church debacle), she is still playing into the show’s logic.
  • Her outrage is pre-scripted by the simulation—nothing she does escapes the feedback loop.
  • The more she tries to assert control, the deeper she gets embedded in the system.

VII. The Machine’s Appetite: Dreams, Desires, and Human Complexity

  • Joan’s dreams (a career with purpose, an authentic relationship) are trivialized.
  • Her emotional interiority is flattened into entertainment.
  • The episode suggests that the machine doesn’t care who you are—only what you can generate.

VIII. Counterargument and Rebuttal

  • Counter: Joan destroys the quantum computer and reclaims her autonomy.
  • Rebuttal: The ending is recursive and ambiguous—she is still inside another simulation.
  • The illusion of victory masks the fact that she never really escaped. The algorithm simply adjusted.

IX. Conclusion

  • Restate the central idea: Joan’s self-reinvention is a mirage engineered by the system that consumes her.
  • “Joan Is Awful” isn’t just a tech horror story—it’s a warning about how we confuse algorithmic participation with self-determination.
  • Final thought: The real horror isn’t that Joan is being watched. It’s that she thinks she’s in control while being completely devoured.

Comments

Leave a comment

More posts