Cinemorphosis

Tag: reviews

  • Bill Burr’s Drop Dead Years: Rage, Reflection, and the Long Road to Emotional Literacy

    Bill Burr’s Drop Dead Years: Rage, Reflection, and the Long Road to Emotional Literacy

    At 56 years old, Bill Burr strides onto the stage looking like a man who hasn’t just survived middle age but has trained for it—lean, sharp, and decked out in a blue sweatshirt, jeans, and sneakers, the unofficial uniform of a guy who’s seen some things but hasn’t yet gone full sweatpants. His latest special, Drop Dead Years (streaming on Hulu), finds him at a crossroads: He’s entered the danger zone—the phase of life where men his age can drop dead at any second. And so, standing before a Seattle crowd, a city he awards first prize in rain-soaked despair, he does what any man staring down mortality would do—he takes stock of his life.

    Burr has baggage, and he knows it. Anger issues? Check. Outdated, offensive language? His wife is on him about it. Emotionally repressed male conditioning? Oh, absolutely. For decades, he’s kept his demons on a leash by staying busy, but when the work stops, his personal hellscape begins. He decides to test a theory: After returning from a tour, instead of distracting himself with projects, he sits in a corner, stares at the TV, and marinates in his own misery. His wife, alarmed, asks if he’s okay. For the first time in his life, he admits the truth: I’m sad. A historic moment for a man raised on the doctrine of shut up and push through.

    But does Burr actually offer any solutions for his emotional demolition derby? Not really—at least not in the special. While he drops breadcrumbs in radio interviews about his self-improvement quest, including the occasional reference to psilocybin therapy, the special mostly stays in the realm of self-awareness rather than self-help. And don’t worry—the fangs are still sharp. Burr unloads on racist conservatives and hypocritical, self-congratulatory liberals with equal fervor, and despite the obvious political leanings of his Seattle audience, no one seems too offended. Maybe that’s part of Burr’s charm—he’s an equal-opportunity agitator, and the crowd knows they’re getting a sermon with a punchline, not a TED Talk.

    Here’s the thing: While I love Burr, I found Drop Dead Years a little… safe. The premise—that wisdom comes with age, that unchecked emotions can consume us, and that kindness and patience improve relationships—is undeniably true but hardly groundbreaking. The performance is solid, his honesty is refreshing, and his intelligence undeniable, but I couldn’t shake the feeling that he was more compelling when I heard him on Terry Gross’ Fresh Air a couple of weeks earlier. There, in a rare good-natured sparring match with the NPR icon, Burr revealed more of himself—and in funnier ways—than he did in his actual special.

    That said, Bill Burr is always worth watching. Even when he’s not at his absolute peak, he’s still one of the sharpest, most brutally honest voices in comedy. So, do I recommend Drop Dead Years? Absolutely. But if you want peak Burr, you might want to queue up that Fresh Air interview right after.

  • Kenny G Is Not Jazz

    Kenny G Is Not Jazz

    I recently watched Listening to Kenny G, Penny Lane’s documentary on the world’s most famous saxophonist. It left me in a knot of conflicting emotions. Here’s a man, decent and diligent, who built a global empire of “smooth jazz”—a genre that, to my ears, is the musical equivalent of baby food: cloying, textureless, and aggressively inoffensive. And yet, millions worship him. The crowds at his concerts glow with unfiltered joy, their faces alight as if they’re receiving communion through the smooth, syrupy notes of his soprano sax.

    Who am I to sneer at them—or at him? I’m just a guy recovering from influenza, after all, with no musical empire to my name. But damn if I didn’t feel the urge to reach for some cultural antacid to settle my aesthetic nausea while judging him and his fans.

    And judge, I did. Kenny G, with his chirpy demeanor and ornithological cheer, seems blissfully detached from the rich, complex history of jazz that his music pretends to embody. He comes across as a musical solipsist, spinning out saccharine, Cliff Notes versions of jazz—an imitation so shallow it feels like he’s never ventured beyond the surface. His long, flowing hair and darting, eager eyes bring to mind a medieval court musician, strumming cloying pavane tunes to lull a bloated king into a post-feast stupor. Listening to Kenny G isn’t an artistic experience; it’s being spoon-fed emotional mush, a cheap confection disguised as depth. This is jazz devoid of soul, grit, or struggle—a hollow desecration of the genre’s essence, delivered with a smile so unrelenting it borders on the surreal.

    And yet, the guilt creeps in. Kenny G himself is disarmingly likable, a man seemingly immune to the venom of critics. He’s successful, and so are many of his fans, who are undoubtedly smart and decent people. Does that make their taste in music immune to critique? Hardly. Popularity is not an arbiter of artistic merit, and Kenny G’s music remains, to me, a vulgarity—saccharine and soulless, a betrayal of jazz’s improvisational brilliance. But the fact that his audience finds bliss in his syrupy melodies leaves me grappling with a larger question: Is artistic taste a bastion of universal truth, or just another playground for our pretensions?

    Am I so obsessed with Kenny G that I feel the need to join the ranks of his detractors, delivering a fiery diatribe like Pat Metheny’s infamous takedown? Not quite. But am I endlessly fascinated that something so blatantly saccharine, so clearly an abomination of music, can bring others to the brink of elation and transcendence? Absolutely. Kenny G’s music strikes me as the sonic equivalent of New Age spirituality: the kind where you pay for a weekend retreat only to be serenaded by a guru with Kenny G’s hair, who doles out self-help clichés like they’re sacred mantras. It’s the auditory version of being flattered into blissful mediocrity, a soothing appeal to one’s narcissism wrapped in smooth sax tones. And let’s face it: the appetite for such cloying bromides is insatiable—and always has been.

    I can’t help but feel a twinge of guilt for roasting Kenny G. I’m clearly afflicted with Sax Shamer’s Syndrome—the nagging unease of mocking a man whose soprano sax has brought legions of fans genuine joy, even if it makes me wince. I try to rationalize my disdain, reminding myself that I, too, have been guilty of infantile pleasures. As a child, I devoured Cap’n Crunch like it was manna from heaven, exalting its sugary crunch as the pinnacle of culinary achievement. The difference? I outgrew Cap’n Crunch. Meanwhile, Kenny G fans seem eternally devoted, treating his smooth jazz like the apotheosis of music. Does that make me a snob for pointing this out, or am I just calling it as I see it?

    The guilt gnaws at me. By deriding Kenny G, I’m effectively sneering at millions of perfectly decent, hard-working people who find solace in his musical equivalent of high-fructose corn syrup. But who am I to judge? I have my own guilty pleasures. I still scroll Instagram for black-and-white photos of 70s bodybuilders, sighing nostalgically for a golden age that was never mine. I still revel in childhood comfort foods—pigs-in-a-blanket dunked in mustard and barbecue sauce, as if I’m at a suburban soirée circa 1982.

    So really, what separates me from the Kenny G crowd? Not much. Scorning his fans isn’t a declaration of superior taste; it’s an act of hubris. We’re all creatures of indulgence, clinging to the things that soothe us. The real sin isn’t enjoying Kenny G or Cap’n Crunch—it’s forgetting that, at the end of the day, we’re all just looking for something to hum along to as we float through life.

  • INTERROGATING THE ALTER EGO OF RACHEL BLOOM IN CRAZY EX-GIRLFRIEND

    INTERROGATING THE ALTER EGO OF RACHEL BLOOM IN CRAZY EX-GIRLFRIEND

    Rachel Bloom weaponizes her alter ego, Rebecca Bunch, to dissect her neuroses with surgical precision, laying bare her obsessions, compulsions, and complete disregard for boundaries. Rebecca isn’t just self-destructive—she’s a human wrecking ball, alienating friends, terrifying acquaintances, and steamrolling her own well-being with reckless abandon. And yet, despite all the chaos, she remains irresistibly lovable, armed with good intentions and a heart too big for her own good.

    Rebecca is a whip-smart New York attorney drowning in success-induced existential despair when fate—or perhaps something more deranged—intervenes. A chance sighting of her old summer camp crush, Josh Chan, sends her into a tailspin of romantic delusion. Suddenly, the only logical course of action isn’t therapy, self-reflection, or even a stiff drink—it’s packing up her entire life and moving to West Covina, California, in pursuit of a man who barely remembers her. What follows is less a fairytale romance and more an operatic descent into obsession, complete with full-blown musical numbers choreographed straight from the fevered depths of her subconscious.

    Once in West Covina, Rebecca lands in a delightfully dysfunctional law firm, where her brilliance is only matched by her ability to make everyone around her deeply uncomfortable. She barrels through life like a caffeinated hurricane, terrifying innocent bystanders with her intellect and intensity, all while chasing an idea of love that exists only in her own head. The show’s most poignant relationship, however, isn’t a romantic one—it’s her friendship with Paula, a sharp-witted, no-nonsense co-worker and mother who, in many ways, fills the maternal void in Rebecca’s life. Paula, trapped in the drudgery of domesticity, finds a thrilling (and slightly concerning) outlet in Rebecca’s increasingly unhinged escapades, turning their dynamic into the show’s emotional anchor.

    At its best, Crazy Ex-Girlfriend thrives on this friendship, an odd yet deeply affecting bond between two women clinging to each other for meaning and validation. But by season four, the show stumbles, bogged down by meandering storylines and an inexplicable reluctance to lean into its greatest strength—Rebecca and Paula’s relationship. The final season drags like an overlong curtain call, but even its missteps can’t erase the brilliance of what came before. At its core, Crazy Ex-Girlfriend is an incisive, darkly hilarious exploration of self-sabotage, redemption, and the uphill battle of getting out of your own way.

  • ANDREW SCHULZ IS NOSTALGIC FOR A BYGONE ERA OF STREETWISE AMERICANA

    ANDREW SCHULZ IS NOSTALGIC FOR A BYGONE ERA OF STREETWISE AMERICANA

    Andrew Schulz’s Netflix comedy special Life is a raw, ribald, and unfiltered chronicle of his and his wife’s grueling journey to have a child. It’s a ride that careens between lewd confessionals, streetwise swagger, and sentimental catharsis. For an hour, Schulz prowls the stage like a wisecracking, mustachioed throwback to an old-school gangster film, his booming presence equal parts stand-up comic and mob enforcer. At six-foot-two, broad-shouldered, and built like a guy who settles arguments with a left hook, he radiates a menace rarely seen in stand-up. This is not a comedian you heckle. You laugh, or you keep quiet.

    I had never seen Schulz’s stand-up before, but I knew him as a popular podcaster, so I figured I’d see what all the fuss was about. It didn’t take long to realize that the hype is well-earned. He’s a master wordsmith, a virtuoso of sarcasm, persona, and hyperbole, wielding his sharp tongue like a switchblade. But what really sets him apart is his ability to straddle two opposing forces: he is both a blistering satirist of the old-school street tough guy and a full-throated champion of it. Watching him, you feel like you’ve been dropped into a smoky Brooklyn steakhouse circa 1975, where the grizzled patriarch of a blue-collar family is holding court at the dinner table, explaining—with obscene embellishments—how the world really works.

    His comedy plays like a high-stakes game of verbal poker. As he launches into brutally unfiltered takes on relationships, sex, and masculinity, he flashes an ambiguous grin, as if daring you to figure out whether he’s mocking the persona or reveling in it. The joke is always half on him, half on you, and entirely in his control. But beneath all the bravado and shock humor, Schulz betrays a sentimental streak. He adores his wife. He’s obsessed with his newborn daughter. By the end, he ditches the swagger for a moment of sincerity, showing a video montage of his family and telling his audience that for all the struggles, the reward is worth it.

    Schulz isn’t just nostalgic for a bygone era of streetwise, no-nonsense Americana—he’s built his entire persona around it. And somehow, in a world of algorithm-driven, sanitized comedy, it works.

  • BREAKING BAD: AN ADDICTION TO BEAUTIFUL SADNESS

    BREAKING BAD: AN ADDICTION TO BEAUTIFUL SADNESS

    Watching Breaking Bad twice isn’t just recommended—it’s a moral obligation. It’s also required to declare it the greatest TV show of all time, even if it’s only in your top three, because the fanboys won’t tolerate anything less. And, honestly, they might be right. I devoured Breaking Bad in the full religious fervor its converts describe, an experience that felt almost biblical in scope. Yes, the show is a masterclass in plotting, character arcs, reversals, and edge-of-your-seat suspense. But at its core, Breaking Bad isn’t about meth, morality, or even power. It’s about Walter White’s eyes—those cavernous, haunted wells of defeat. Without them, the show collapses.

    What makes those eyes so tragic? A single, crushing word: demoralization. Walter White begins as a good man, fighting tooth and nail to support his family, only to be rewarded with a Job-like curse—a terminal illness and a society that treats educators like disposable placeholders. Stripped of dignity, forced to work a humiliating second job washing cars for the very students who mock him, he finally breaks bad—cashing in his chemistry genius for a descent into meth-laced perdition. Breaking Bad is a tragedy in the classical sense, charting the fall of a man who was never evil, just desperate, and in his desperation, damns his own soul.

    But here’s the thing: Breaking Bad isn’t just about whether Walter White loses his soul. It’s about whether we can bear to watch him do it. And that takes me back to those eyes—deep pools of melancholy that remind me of another doomed wanderer from TV history: Bill Bixby’s Dr. David Banner in The Incredible Hulk. Like Walter White, Banner is a man crushed under the weight of a world that doesn’t understand him. Like Walter, he transforms into a monster, not because he wants to, but because he must. And like Walter, he walks alone.

    Nothing captures that loneliness quite like The Incredible Hulk’s “Lonely Man” piano theme, composed by Joe Harnell—a piece so heartbreaking, so drenched in sorrow, it practically seeps through the screen. Every episode ends the same way: Banner, shoulders slumped, hitchhiking down an endless road to nowhere, forever exiled from a world that fears him. Swap out Banner’s tattered duffel bag for Walter White’s grim smirk in the show’s final scene, and you’ll see they’re walking the same road.

    Looking back, I realize that my love for The Incredible Hulk in my teens and Breaking Bad in my middle age isn’t a coincidence. It’s an addiction—to beautiful sadness. I’m drawn to characters whose sorrow is so vast, so overwhelming, that it takes on a tragic elegance. They aren’t just suffering; they’re symphonies of suffering, played in minor keys. And I can’t stop listening.

  • ROAD HOUSE IS A 2-HOUR INFOMERCIAL FOR TESTOSTERONE

    ROAD HOUSE IS A 2-HOUR INFOMERCIAL FOR TESTOSTERONE

    My pride as a lifelong bodybuilder took a glorious nosedive one recent evening when, sprawled on the couch like a man who had long abandoned ambition, I decided to indulge in the cinematic opus that is Road House. This film—if we must use that term generously—stars a Jake Gyllenhaal so sculpted he looks like Michelangelo, midway through carving David, got bored and said, Screw it, let’s make him a UFC fighter instead.

    Gyllenhaal plays a brooding, sinewy bouncer in Key West, grinding out a living by doing what all action heroes must—protecting a bar and its stunning owner, played by Jessica Williams, from the looming threat of corrupt mob bosses. Naturally, this leads to an inevitable showdown with their number-one enforcer: Conor McGregor, sporting the physique of a shaved grizzly bear on clenbuterol, his veins bulging like he’s one flex away from detonating. His performance lands somewhere between rabid pit bull and man who hasn’t blinked since 2019, and frankly, it’s magnificent.

    The plot? Barely there—thinner than a gas station receipt and about as consequential. It’s the classic Western trope: a stranger rides into town, cleans up the mess, and leaves behind a trail of broken bones and smoldering stares. But let’s not kid ourselves—the storyline exists solely as an excuse to showcase glistening, heaving slabs of muscle in slow motion. The camera caresses each bicep, each rippling lat, with the kind of reverence usually reserved for Renaissance art. It’s not an action movie so much as a two-hour infomercial for pre-workout supplements, high-intensity interval training, and whatever unregulated substance has been making its way through underground fight gyms.

    Somewhere between Gyllenhaal’s 47th shirtless moment and McGregor snarling like a man whose only source of hydration is pure testosterone, I found myself reaching for my phone—not to check the time, but to Google Conor McGregor’s diet plan. Because Road House isn’t just a film—it’s a flashing neon sign reminding you that you are, at best, a sentient pudding cup compared to these granite-hewn demigods. This isn’t entertainment; it’s an intervention. And the message is clear: drop the remote, pick up a kettlebell, and try to reclaim your dignity before it’s too late.

    When the credits finally rolled and I peeled myself off the couch, I had a revelation—if I wanted my memoir, Cinemorphosis: How I Become the Hero of Every Show I’ve Ever Watched, to thrive in today’s ruthless marketplace, it too needed a marketing tie-in. Just as Road House is a Trojan horse for fitness supplements and gym memberships, my book needed its own branded merchandise. But considering my subject matter—living vicariously through TV characters—the only viable promotional tie-in would be a chain of Self-Flagellation Chambers™, where disillusioned TV addicts could atone for their wasted lives. Or perhaps a TV Watcher’s Repentance Kit, complete with a burlap sack, an artisanal cilice, and a deluxe “discipline” whip for those long, dark nights of the soul.