Cinemorphosis

Tag: travel

  • The Signal Hunter: From Vintage Radios to Atomic G-Shocks

    The Signal Hunter: From Vintage Radios to Atomic G-Shocks

    For a long time before I became a watch obsessive, I was a radio obsessive. This was the early 2000s, when my idea of a thrilling evening involved testing AM sensitivity and comparing FM clarity the way sommeliers compare Burgundy. I developed an unhealthy admiration for 1960s and 70s Sony and Panasonic radios—machines that looked as if NASA engineers had been given permission to design living-room furniture.

    That obsession never really left. I still keep half a dozen high-end Tecsun radios scattered around the house like electronic houseplants. One in the kitchen. One in the bedroom. One in the garage. Each quietly sipping signals from the air.

    Over the next two decades my attention drifted from radios to watches, and not modest watches either. I assembled a small stable of Seiko mechanical divers, some pushing well north of three thousand dollars. They were beautiful machines—tiny brass orchestras ticking away beneath sapphire glass.

    Then, about a month ago, something strange happened. I unplugged emotionally from the mechanicals and wandered into the strange, glowing world of G-Shock Multiband-6 atomic watches.

    And to my surprise, I’m having more fun with this hobby than I ever did before.

    These watches cost a fraction of my mechanical divers. Yet I’m connecting with them more deeply. That should bother me. It doesn’t.

    But let’s not dramatize this as some kind of betrayal of my mechanical diver heritage. This is not treason. It’s zoning.

    Think of it like Jay Leno’s Big Dog Garage near the Burbank airport. Leno divides his collection between vintage machines and modern ones. Two different eras. Two different moods.

    My watch world now works the same way.

    On one side of the garage sit my mechanical divers. They’re the horological equivalent of a 1959 BMW 507 convertible with a four-speed manual. When I strap one on, it’s like taking a country drive through nostalgia. The wind is loud. The ride is bumpy. The engine chatters like a coffee grinder full of marbles.

    And occasionally, that experience is glorious.

    But as the years pile up, those drives become less frequent. The wind noise, the rattling, the mechanical fussiness—eventually the romance demands a bit more patience than my bones want to give.

    Now walk across the garage.

    Here you’ll find the modern fleet: my Multiband-6 G-Shocks.

    These are the Honda, Lexus, and BMW sedans of the watch world. Smooth handling. Effortless precision. A cabin so insulated from chaos that time itself arrives wirelessly in the middle of the night.

    Moving between a G-Shock and a mechanical diver is like stepping from a luxury sedan into a vintage convertible. Two different universes. Neither one replaces the other. You simply choose which universe you feel like visiting.

    And as my eyes grow older and slightly crankier, I can already see where I may end up parking more often: something like the G-Shock Mudman GW-9500 with a big positive display.

    Positive display only, mind you. Negative displays are pure muscle-flex cosplay. I already get plenty of testosterone from the armored tank aesthetic of G-Shock design. I don’t need the digits hiding in a cave as well.

    But here’s the deeper truth.

    My attraction to Multiband-6 watches has quietly returned me to my radio roots.

    The vintage radio hobby and the atomic watch hobby attract the same personality type. They scratch the same itch.

    Both revolve around the quiet thrill of pulling invisible signals out of the air.

    In that sense, I am what I like to call a Signal Hunter.

    A signal hunter doesn’t simply collect equipment. He collects moments of reception. The tiny surge of satisfaction when a device—a Sony shortwave radio or a G-Shock atomic watch—locks onto something traveling through the ether.

    The world is whispering signals constantly. Most people never notice.

    But if you have the right instrument, the air suddenly comes alive.

    To improve my odds of catching those signals, I recently ordered an industrial pipe jewelry and headphone stand. Apparently many G-Shock owners swear that letting the watch rest overnight on a piece of metal—like a pipe or curtain rod—helps the antenna catch the atomic time signal more reliably.

    The moment I read this, resistance was futile. I ordered the stand immediately.

    Because suddenly I was six years old again.

    I had my Batman Bat-Signal flashlight. I had my decoder ring. And the universe was sending secret messages again.

    Syncing my G-Shocks has become a nightly ritual.

    And rituals are my natural habitat.

    Coffee. Oatmeal. Protein powder. Kettlebells. Mechanical watch winding. Atomic watch syncing.

    Different objects.

    Same impulse.

    Order the world. Listen closely. Catch the signal.

  • The Day Grief Turned Into Courage at Canyon High School

    The Day Grief Turned Into Courage at Canyon High School

    This happened about fifty years ago, so forgive me if some of the details have softened around the edges. Memory fades, but certain moments burn themselves into the mind so deeply that time cannot erase them. This is one of those moments.

    I was fourteen, a freshman at Canyon High School. It was during PE, just before lunch, and we were on the outdoor basketball courts. The courts sat beside a grassy field that sloped down into a steep canyon. A narrow trail zigzagged up the canyon wall toward a quiet residential neighborhood above us.

    The trail had its regular occupants: the self-appointed tough guys who preferred ditching PE to playing sports. They would lean on the canyon tiers like spectators in cheap seats, laughing at the rest of us for following the rules.

    One of them was a loudmouth whose name I’ve forgotten. Let’s call him Jeremy.

    That day Jeremy and his friends stood above us on the canyon trail, tossing dirt clods down onto the courts. Most of them missed, but one landed close enough to sting the air around my friend Mark Redman.

    Mark stood out among us. He was over six feet tall, lean and muscular, with long black wavy hair that brushed his shoulders. He ran track and threw the javelin. Quiet, mostly to himself. My friends had recently told me that Mark had just lost a parent. I don’t remember whether it was his mother or father, but I remember the grief in his eyes when I offered my condolences.

    When the dirt clod nearly struck him, Mark looked up and calmly told Jeremy to cut it out.

    Jeremy grinned and shouted something cruel back down. I don’t remember the exact words, but it was the kind of remark meant to wound—something low and cheap.

    Then something changed.

    Mark went perfectly still. His eyes locked onto Jeremy. The expression on his face shifted into something I will never forget: fury mixed with resolve, the kind of cold certainty that comes when a man has decided exactly what must happen next.

    Without a word he tore off his tank top, balled it up, and started climbing the canyon.

    The transformation stunned everyone.

    But it wasn’t only Mark who transformed. So did Jeremy. His grin vanished. His mouth hung open as he watched Mark coming toward him. In that instant he understood the situation perfectly. He could run, but Mark was faster. He could fight, but Mark was animated by a courage Jeremy would never have. So Jeremy did the only thing left to him.

    He stood there and waited.

    When Mark reached him, Jeremy made a weak attempt to defend himself—more out of pride than hope. It lasted only seconds. Mark pummeled Jeremy to the ground, delivered the message clearly, and told him never to treat him that way again.

    Then, without celebration or swagger, Mark walked back down the canyon, disappeared into the locker room, and left the rest of us standing there in stunned silence.

    Over the years I’ve thought about that moment often. Watching a grieving young man summon that kind of conviction gives me a kind of moral clarity that has stayed with me. In a world that often feels confused and chaotic, I remember the look on Mark’s face that day.

    Mark, wherever you are, I have never forgotten you.

  • When Giving a Watch to Someone Is the Ultimate Selfishness

    When Giving a Watch to Someone Is the Ultimate Selfishness

    Core members of G-Shock Nation revere the GW-5000U because it represents the moment the Square stopped flexing and started aging well. It carries the 1983 blueprint, but underneath the familiar shape lives grown-up engineering: steel inner case, screwback, soft resin that disappears on the wrist, solar power, Multiband 6. No tactical cosplay. No feature inflation. No desperate attempt to look extreme. It sits there dense, quiet, perfectly accurate, and emotionally undemanding. To the initiated, that restraint signals maturity. The owner is no longer chasing the next G-Shock. He has arrived. The GW-5000U isn’t admired for excess; it’s admired for restraint. In a hobby addicted to novelty, the greatest watch is the one that makes novelty feel unnecessary.

    Collectors buy the GW-5000U the way serious readers buy a hardbound classic they’ve already finished online. The object represents a principle. It is the philosophical center of the Square ecosystem—the pure form. Screwback steel, operational silence, atomic precision, no theatrics, no gimmicks. Owning it signals allegiance to a worldview: function over spectacle, permanence over churn, competence over excitement. The purchase isn’t about need. It’s about completion. Without the 5000U, the collection feels like a conversation circling its point. With it, the argument finally lands. The watch becomes less a tool than an anchor—an idea made physical, a quiet declaration that you are no longer collecting features; you are collecting coherence.

    And yet, as you contemplate its greatness, a physical reality intrudes. The watch is small. Your eight-inch wrists and decades of barbell diplomacy have produced forearms that turn the Square into a polite suggestion of a watch. You no longer care about wrist presence, but wearing something that looks like a borrowed child’s timepiece crosses a line. Philosophical perfection is one thing. Visual credibility is another.

    Then comes the rationalization. Your twin daughters. The GW-5000U would look perfect on them. It would teach them punctuality, discipline, operational thinking. It would introduce them to the beauty of silent precision. It would, naturally, make them chips off the old block. You present the idea with the enthusiasm of a man offering enlightenment. They respond with the facial expression normally reserved for unexpected homework. In that moment, clarity arrives. This isn’t mentorship. This is Proxy Justification—the collector’s sleight of hand, where a purchase he cannot defend for himself is reassigned to someone else while quietly serving his own emotional agenda. The language is generosity. The motive is displacement. He isn’t buying a gift. He’s buying wrist time by proxy.

    The realization lands hard and fast. The box remains unpurchased. The daughters remain uninterested. And you step back, a little embarrassed, a little wiser, and briefly sober. In a hobby built on elegant rationalizations, the rarest achievement isn’t the right watch. It’s the moment you recognize a bad story—and don’t tell it to yourself.

  • The Frogman Conversion: When a Mechanical Loyalist Defects

    The Frogman Conversion: When a Mechanical Loyalist Defects

    Over the last twenty years of my watch madness, I have pilgrimaged to the Land of Mechanical Divers and have felt comfortable there. I have friends in the community who live in a distant tribe, the Land of G-Shock Precision. I respect them, I hear their calls from the distance–a prairie, a tundra, a rocky coast. I even sometimes run into them at Costco. I consider them honorable friends of mine, these G-Shock wearers, but I have always seen myself of someone who comes from another tribe. I did try to venture into their territory from time to time, purchasing handsome $100 G-Shocks, but I never bonded with them, and I ended up giving them away as gifts, and felt relieved afterwards. 

    This isn’t to say I am immune from the allure of G-Shock. There is one in particular that has smitten me for well over ten years. It is the Frogman GWF-1000. Unlike my mechanical divers, this is no analog beast. It is digital atomic. I have always been drawn to its professional tool look, its massive wrist presence, its lineage to the Seiko Arnie, and its bold asymmetry.

    So I told myself I would get one G-Shock to the fold. It would be more of a gimmick piece, an adornment for cosplay, a sort of joke. But I was wrong. Very wrong. As soon as I put it on my wrist, it felt it had melded to my skin, and it was part of me. The words “Tough Solar” seemed like a beckoning call of reassurance. 

    But what really killed me was the unexpected. I always have had a philosophic contempt for digital time, equating it with soulless phones and smartwatches. Digital time was a betrayal of my analog retro diver vibe. Or so I thought. As I looked down at my Frogman’s digital atomic readout, I found myself loving the legibility and accuracy more than my analog divers. 

    Take the classic cars from my youth. Those late-60 models of Mustang and Barracuda. Yes, they are lookers. But they don’t drive well compared to today’s cars. They squeak, they bounce, they have subpar climate control. Get into a new car and you can’t compare the technology and the comfort to vintage cars of old. Wearing my Frogman, I felt I had exited a creaky vintage car and was now gliding inside a technical marvel.

    I hate to admit this, but I now resent squinting my eyes at analog watches. I hate even more wondering why it is acceptable that a watch that costs thousands of dollars is less accurate than my atomic Frogman. 

    I don’t know what is happening to me. I don’t know where my mind will be in six months. All I know is this Frogman and its comforting atomic digital readout is not leaving my wrist.

    Friends of the watch community, hear me: You may be witnessing a Tribal Migration Event: the moment a collector crosses a long-standing identity boundary—mechanical to quartz, analog to digital, diver to tool watch—and discovers unexpected belonging. What begins as a temporary visit or novelty purchase becomes a relocation of allegiance. The emotional shock comes not from the new watch itself but from the realization that one’s horological identity was less fixed than previously believed.

  • The G-Shock Frogman and the Bureaucratic State

    The G-Shock Frogman and the Bureaucratic State

    Over the past forty-eight hours, DHL has sent me approximately two dozen updates about my G-Shock Frogman GWF-1000. Each message arrives with the urgency of a geopolitical crisis, as if the watch were a sensitive diplomatic asset being escorted through a chain of unstable regimes.

    Update received.
    Status changed.
    Action required.

    At one point, a text informed me that I needed to verify my identity—name, address, confirmation that I am indeed the lawful civilian awaiting a rubber-strapped amphibious instrument. I complied immediately. Filled out the form. Submitted the data. Received confirmation.

    Case closed, I thought.

    Case not closed.

    The Frogman is now stranded in customs, apparently under suspicion of either espionage, tariff evasion, or unauthorized aquatic activity.

    I contacted DHL customer service. A courteous representative informed me that my shipment would be “investigated” and that I should expect an email within a few hours. At this stage, I am waiting to learn what additional documentation, declaration, or ceremonial tribute will be required before the watch is released back into the general population.

    The order was placed eleven days ago through Sakura. I’ve purchased from them before without incident. This time, however, the experience feels less like shipping and more like applying for a mid-level government clearance. Whether the delay is caused by tariffs, enforcement changes, or the invisible hand of bureaucratic entropy, I cannot say.

    What I do know is that the process introduces a new emotional variable into overseas buying: friction. Not the minor inconvenience of delay, but the slow accumulation of uncertainty—the growing suspicion that any international purchase may evolve into a procedural endurance event.

    Buying a watch is supposed to generate anticipation.

    This generates vigilance.

    The promise of modern commerce is frictionless efficiency: click, ship, deliver. What I’m experiencing is its bureaucratic inverse. Identity verification. Clearance holds. Investigation windows. Status alerts arriving like play-by-play commentary from a logistics obstacle course.

    This isn’t tracking.

    This is surveillance—of my own anxiety.

    I appear to be suffering from Customs Suspense Syndrome: a condition in which a routine shipment becomes a serialized drama of ambiguity and delay. The buyer no longer follows a package; he refreshes a timeline the way a patient checks for lab results, searching for signs of life.

    Ordering a watch should not feel like running a gauntlet.

    Yet here we are.

    This is not frictionless commerce.

    This is American Gladiators: Customs Edition.

  • The Watch That Quietly Took Over Your Life

    The Watch That Quietly Took Over Your Life

    Every so often, a strange coup takes place inside a watch collection. One piece—sometimes a $50 Casio, sometimes a $5,000 Tudor—quietly stages a takeover. It doesn’t announce its intentions. It simply shows up on your wrist one morning… and then the next… and then every day after that. Before long, the rest of the collection sits in the watch box like retired generals, decorated but inactive. Without ceremony, without debate, you’ve acquired a Watch Buddy—the one piece that absorbs nearly all your wrist time and rewrites the rules of your ownership.

    What makes the phenomenon unsettling is that you didn’t go looking for it. This was not your grail, your research obsession, your late-night forum fixation. It just happened. Somewhere between errands, workouts, and ordinary Tuesdays, the watch proved itself comfortable, legible, reliable, emotionally neutral in the best way. You wake up one day and realize you’re living inside the Accidental Grail Effect: a lifelong favorite that earned its status the old-fashioned way—by being easy to live with. No mythology. No prestige theater. Just quiet competence and the absence of friction.

    Curiously, most enthusiasts don’t liquidate the rest of the collection once the hierarchy becomes obvious. The other watches remain in their slots, like supporting actors who make the lead look better simply by standing nearby. Their presence sharpens the contrast. The Watch Buddy doesn’t just win—it wins by comparison, day after day, until its dominance feels less like a choice and more like gravity.

    This is not a honeymoon. Honeymoons are loud, hormonal, and short-lived—social-media enthusiasm followed by the inevitable cooling. The Watch Buddy is something else entirely: a long marriage. The dopamine fades, the novelty disappears, and what remains is habit, trust, and emotional silence. From that point forward, the collector’s behavior changes. The chase slows. The fantasy of the next perfect watch loses voltage. Because once you’ve found the one you actually live in, the rest of the hobby begins to look like what it always was—auditions.

  • The Illusion of Variety: Why All My Watches Look the Same

    The Illusion of Variety: Why All My Watches Look the Same

    My wife looks at my watch box and delivers her verdict with the efficiency of a forensic accountant: they’re all the same. Dark dials. Rotating bezels. Nuclear lume. Rubber straps. To her, I don’t own a collection—I own nine copies of the same idea. A redundancy with slightly different logos.

    I protest, of course. This one has a warmer dial tone. That one wears thinner. The other has superior bezel action and lume that could guide aircraft at night. To me, each piece has a personality, a purpose, a place in the rotation. But the uncomfortable truth remains: they are all divers. I am not merely a watch enthusiast. I am a subtype addict. Once the diver aesthetic locked onto my brain, every future desire began passing through that single filter.

    The roots of this pathology go back to childhood, where my mother enabled my early training in the Illusion of Variety. My diet revolved around Cap’n Crunch in all its alleged diversity: plain, Crunch Berries, Peanut Butter, plus the rebranded cousins—Quisp, Quake, King Vitamin—each promising novelty while delivering the same sugar-coated destiny. I approached these cereals with the seriousness of a sommelier comparing vintages, convinced I was exploring nuance while eating the same bowl under different costumes. It was freedom without risk, choice without change. A sugary Groundhog Day.

    Looking back, the pattern is obvious. I didn’t want options; I wanted reassurance disguised as options. Real variety carries danger—the possibility of regret, mismatch, or disappointment. Sameness offers safety. Familiar shapes, familiar flavors, familiar outcomes. Bliss with guardrails.

    That same psychology now lives in my watch box. Different brands, different cases, different shades of black—but always the same architecture, the same toolish language, the same emotional terrain. To outsiders, monotony. To me, refinement.

    This is the Category Fixation Loop: the moment a collector discovers the one design language that feels right and thereafter interprets every new desire through that narrow lens. The hobby doesn’t expand; it tunnels. Each purchase feels like exploration, but the geography never changes.

    On one level, my watches are identical. On another, they are infinitely different. The contradiction is the point. Variety, safely contained inside sameness—the Cap’n Crunch strategy, now rated to 200 meters.

  • When Bold Becomes Desperate: The Toxic Green Frogman I Didn’t Buy

    When Bold Becomes Desperate: The Toxic Green Frogman I Didn’t Buy

    The limited-edition G-Shock Frogman GW-8200TPF-1 is called the “Three-Striped Poison Dart Frog,” a name that tells you everything you need to know. Its case and bezel are streaked in oily black and radioactive neon green, a visual homage to the rainforest amphibians whose skin carries enough toxin to tip a hunting arrow. The watch doesn’t whisper. It hisses. It looks less like a timepiece and more like something that escaped from a biohazard lab. And I have to admit: I could see it on my wrist.

    Which is precisely the problem.

    I am sixty-four years old. This watch belongs on the arm of a young man who still believes the world is a stage and he is the headliner. On me, it risks reading like a cautionary tale. I picture myself as the suburban retiree on a zebra-striped Harley, shirtless under a leather vest, ponytail fluttering, ears weighed down with fishing-lure jewelry. Not rebellion—neediness. Not confidence—pleading. In this light, the Poison Dart becomes what I now recognize as a Final Cry Watch: the late-career purchase meant to shout, I’m still dangerous, when the quieter truth is that one is negotiating a truce with time.

    And yet the attraction persists. That’s the uncomfortable part. Awareness does not cancel desire; it merely narrates it. A part of me even welcomes the idea of restraint—the sedation that comes from declining the spectacle, choosing dignity over fluorescent self-advertisement.

    In the end, what saved me was not wisdom but suspicion. That dramatic spray coating—how long before it fades, chips, or peels? And when the neon begins to die, what remains? Not a bold statement. Not a heroic relic. An Insult Watch—a once-loud object aging badly, like a midlife impulse left out in the sun.

    So the purchase died where many impulses should: in the quiet courtroom of anticipated regret. The Poison Dart remains what it probably was all along—not destiny, not transformation, just a bright, dangerous flirtation with caprice.

  • Buy Now, Regret Later: How Ancient Instincts Ruined Modern Shopping

    Buy Now, Regret Later: How Ancient Instincts Ruined Modern Shopping

    In the early 1990s, I saw comedian Rob Becker perform Defending the Caveman in San Francisco—a one-man anthropology class disguised as stand-up. His central thesis, stitched together from kitchen-table spats with his wife, was that men are hunters, women are gatherers, and this prehistoric wiring still runs our modern relationships like a bad operating system.

    His proof? Shopping.

    For the gatherer, shopping is a leisurely daydream. Wandering the mall for six hours and imagining buying things she can’t afford is an enriching sensory experience—like spiritual window-shopping. For the hunter, shopping is a surgical strike. He wants pants. He buys pants. He leaves. The suggestion to “just browse” makes his eye twitch.

    “Let’s get the hell out of here,” says the man. He has completed his mission. He has felled the beast.

    That moment—man as single-focus, tunnel-visioned, goal-oriented predator—explains a great deal about the pathology of watch addiction. We are still cavemen, just hairier and worse at squatting. And we don’t hunt food anymore. We hunt wristwear.

    We see a watch online and a brontosaurus steak lights up in our brain. Locked in. Target acquired. Our dopamine circuits spark like faulty Christmas lights. We must have it. There is no tranquility, no peace, until the object is in our possession.

    The problem? Our primitive instincts weren’t designed for the digital age. Back then, acquiring a new object meant trekking through wilderness, battling saber-toothed tigers, and earning your meal. Today, it’s clicking a “Buy Now” button while half-watching a YouTube review at your ergonomic standing desk, surrounded by a sea of unopened Amazon boxes. Intoxicated by online shopping platforms, we are overcome with the Horological Hunt Reflex–the involuntary lock-on response triggered by spotting a desirable watch. Once activated, attention narrows, patience evaporates, and the collector cannot rest until the object is captured—regardless of need, cost, or logic.

    Our brains still think we’re walking 40 miles to spear a mammoth. In reality, we’re reclining in office chairs with lumbar support, ordering $2,000 divers like they’re takeout sushi. The hunt requires no sacrifice, no sweat, no real effort. And so it never satisfies.

    This caveman instinct affects our watch hobby. We get the watch. We admire it. We post a photo to Instagram. Then—we twitch. We fidget. Our brain says, “Good job. Now go get another.”

    We are not content in the cave. Evolution didn’t design us for stillness. It designed us to be hungry. To prepare. To hoard. So we keep hunting. And the cave fills with stainless steel trophies until the glint attracts low-flying pterodactyls that dive-bomb us in our sleep and try to pluck the Omega off our wrist.

    We are maladapted creatures. Our eyeballs evolved for survival. Now they doom us. We were built to scan the horizon for danger. Now we scan Hodinkee, Instagram, Reddit, eBay, WatchRecon, and Chrono24 until our dopamine is a wrung-out dishrag and our bank account is an obituary.

    We’re trapped in a glitch—stone-age instincts, 5G bandwidth. Our visual fixation, once essential to survival, now chains us to a cycle of desire and regret. Thousands of watches flood our screens in a single hour, and our brains are too old and too soft to resist. The only real solution is exile. But exile from what? Our jobs, our networks, our entire digital lives?

    There is no cave to retreat to. Just another tab open.

  • Why Good Salsa Matters

    Why Good Salsa Matters

    In 1967, my father took me to the grand opening of a Taco Bell in San Jose, California. This was my first encounter with fast food as spectacle—and with teenagers as a category of human being. They stood behind the registers in a loose formation, and every one of them appeared to be afflicted with the same alarming facial condition. Spots everywhere. An outbreak.

    I was five. I did the math available to me. Had a disease swept through the workforce? Did Taco Bell exposure cause lesions? Were the refried beans radioactive?

    I asked my father what was wrong with their faces.

    “They’re pimples,” he said. Then, without hesitation, he added, “According to Aristotle, God gives pimples to teenagers to teach them humility.”

    I knew immediately this was untrue. Not because I had read Aristotle—I hadn’t—but because I knew my father. This was him doing what he loved most: inventing authority on the spot. He also harbored a low-grade contempt for teenagers, whom he regarded as overconfident and undercooked. Acne, in his view, was divine pushback. Cosmic slapstick.

    The pimples unsettled me, but they did not interfere with my appetite. I ate my tacos and frijoles under the Taco Bell canopy, admiring the beige stone “Mexican” architecture—the aesthetic equivalent of a sombrero on a filing cabinet. The food itself was a novelty. We didn’t eat Mexican food, and Taco Bell certainly wasn’t Mexican food, but it was a portal. A gateway drug.

    Within a few years, my mother was making tacos, burritos, and enchiladas at home. Our Mexican-American neighbors, Mike and Felice Orozco, made salsa from ingredients grown in our own backyards. The salsa lived on the coffee table in a volcanic tureen, like something sacred and faintly dangerous. You could smell it the moment you walked into the living room—chilies, onions, garlic, alive and unapologetic.

    The color stopped you. A deep ruby red. Not restaurant red. Not industrial red. Real red. I have eaten excellent salsa over the decades, but nothing has ever matched the salsa Felice Orozco taught my mother to make in the late 1960s. Even now, if a Mexican restaurant brings out a pre-meal salsa that approaches that standard—even halfway—I take it as a sign of moral seriousness.

    Felice Orozco’s salsa wasn’t just delicious. It was philosophical. It carried an unspoken argument about what survives and what matters. When families pass down food traditions, they’re saying something quietly radical: some knowledge deserves care, repetition, and fidelity. This isn’t about novelty or performance. It’s not about artisanal swagger or bragging rights. It’s about love made practical. Wisdom with onions.

    So what was Taco Bell to me as a child? A desecration of Mexican food? No. It was a signpost. A crude outpost with a faint aroma of the real thing. It pointed toward a richer city beyond itself—a place where food meant connection, where flavors carried memory and generosity.

    The sign didn’t point south.
    It pointed to Felice Orozco’s house.