Here are three essay prompts, each suitable for a 9-paragraph essay, that ask students to engage with the concept of Ozempification through comparisons of Black Mirror episodes “Joan Is Awful” and “Rachel, Jack and Ashley Too”, along with Sherry Turkle’s TED Talk “Connected, but alone?”. Each prompt encourages analysis of algorithmic identity, performative selfhood, and the psychological costs of living under constant digital surveillance.
Ozempification Defined:
Ozempification is the cultural phenomenon in which individuals pursue algorithmic self-optimization—not to become their most authentic selves, but to conform to marketable standards of desirability, productivity, and social approval. Named after the weight-loss drug Ozempic, this term captures a broader societal shift: the reduction of human identity into a curated, data-driven performance designed to appease commercial algorithms and social metrics. In the Ozempified world, people aren’t living—they’re auditioning, endlessly tweaking their appearance, output, and persona to fit a digital ideal that is polished, palatable, and profoundly hollow. It’s not transformation; it’s conformity, sanitized for mass consumption.
Prompt 1: The Algorithmic Self and the Death of Authenticity
In “Joan Is Awful” and “Rachel, Jack and Ashley Too,” characters are forced to live as flattened versions of themselves, manipulated by media systems that extract their identity for profit and spectacle. Sherry Turkle, in her TED Talk “Connected, but alone?” warns that technology fosters performative connection while eroding genuine intimacy and self-awareness.
Write a 9-paragraph argumentative essay exploring how the concept of Ozempification applies to these characters’ journeys. Are they victims of algorithmic self-optimization? Do they regain any sense of authentic identity by the end? What does Turkle add to our understanding of how technology shapes or distorts the self?
Prompt 2: Visibility as a Trap—Fame, Surveillance, and the Marketable Self
Both “Joan Is Awful” and “Rachel, Jack and Ashley Too” present a dystopian vision of fame as a form of imprisonment, where visibility is not freedom but a carefully curated trap. Sherry Turkle argues that our digital lives are making us increasingly lonely, even as we present more of ourselves to others online.
Write a 9-paragraph essay in which you argue whether the kind of fame and “connection” offered in these stories reflects the pressures of Ozempification—the transformation of identity into a commercially viable product. How do metrics, surveillance, and public performance erode the characters’ freedom? Can one opt out of this system?
Prompt 3: Rebellion Against the Algorithm—Is Escape Possible?
In both “Joan Is Awful” and “Rachel, Jack and Ashley Too,” the protagonists attempt to break free from the algorithmic systems that control their identities. Sherry Turkle, however, suggests that even our resistance to digital life often happens within the confines of digital culture.
Write a 9-paragraph essay arguing whether rebellion against Ozempification is truly possible in these stories—or if the system simply absorbs and repackages dissent. Do Joan and Ashley succeed in reclaiming their humanity, or are they still trapped in a commodified feedback loop? Use Turkle’s ideas to complicate or support your position.
Here are three 9-paragraph essay outlines based on your Ozempification framework, integrating Black Mirror episodes “Joan Is Awful”, “Rachel, Jack and Ashley Too”, and Sherry Turkle’s TED Talk “Connected, but alone?”. Each outline includes a clear argumentative structure that aligns with your concept of algorithmic self-optimization and cultural conformity.
Prompt 1: The Algorithmic Self and the Death of Authenticity
Thesis: In “Joan Is Awful” and “Rachel, Jack and Ashley Too”, the characters are dehumanized by systems that algorithmically flatten their identities into commercial products; Sherry Turkle’s critique of digital connection clarifies how this algorithmic distortion is not just fictional, but a reflection of how real people now perform identity rather than live it.
Paragraph Outline:
- Introduction
- Define Ozempification
- Introduce texts
- Thesis statement
- Joan’s Performance of Self
- How the algorithm reduces her life into a marketable soap opera
- Her lack of agency, exaggerated identity
- Ashley Too and the Pop Persona
- Ashley O’s identity is hijacked for mass consumption
- The robot version is more marketable than the real person
- Turkle’s Argument on Performed Identity
- Turkle’s concept of “presentation anxiety”
- How we curate selves for approval rather than authenticity
- Comparison: Technology As Identity Sculptor
- Link between Joan, Ashley, and Turkle’s view of digital selfhood
- All three show erosion of real, messy, human identity
- The Cost of Algorithmic Identity
- Mental/emotional collapse in Joan and Ashley
- Loneliness, confusion, loss of interiority
- Turkle’s Critique of Connection vs. Intimacy
- Illusion of closeness vs. real vulnerability
- Joan and Ashley are both isolated in their “hyper-connected” worlds
- Can Authenticity Be Reclaimed?
- How characters begin reclaiming their voices
- Turkle’s call for conversation and solitude
- Conclusion
- Restate thesis
- Argue that resisting Ozempification requires withdrawing from metrics-based identity altogether
Prompt 2: Visibility as a Trap—Fame, Surveillance, and the Marketable Self
Thesis: Fame in “Joan Is Awful” and “Rachel, Jack and Ashley Too” is a form of algorithmic imprisonment, where surveillance and social approval shape identity; Turkle’s TED Talk shows how this kind of fame is not reserved for celebrities—social media has trapped all of us in a system of constant performance and commodified selfhood.
Paragraph Outline:
- Introduction
- Define Ozempification
- Preview arguments about fame, surveillance, and identity
- Thesis statement
- Fame as Surveillance in “Joan Is Awful”
- Joan’s life as a surveillance feed
- Her every move shaped by the anticipation of how it will be broadcast
- Ashley O’s Prison of Pop Stardom
- Her body and voice controlled by algorithms
- Her personality repackaged into Ashley Too
- Turkle’s View of the “Performance Trap”
- Social media makes everyone a brand
- We feel we must be “on” all the time
- Comparison: Hyper-Visibility = Powerlessness
- Joan and Ashley lose control of their own stories
- Turkle: even non-famous people suffer from this kind of digital exposure
- Ozempification as the Engine of Spectacle
- All three texts show how commercial systems reward polished surfaces, not depth
- Discuss how likes/followers/ratings become forms of surveillance
- Psychological Toll of Perpetual Performance
- Joan’s breakdown; Ashley’s coma
- Turkle: tech gives illusion of control, but creates anxiety
- Is Escape Possible?
- Ashley rebels with help; Joan finds the real Joan
- Turkle: only through conversation and reflection can we break the cycle
- Conclusion
- Restate thesis
- Argue that visibility, once seen as power, is now a form of algorithmic control
Prompt 3: Rebellion Against the Algorithm—Is Escape Possible?
Thesis: While “Joan Is Awful” and “Rachel, Jack and Ashley Too” present rebellion as a satisfying arc, Sherry Turkle’s analysis suggests that true resistance to Ozempification is far more difficult, because even acts of rebellion are easily absorbed and commodified by the very platforms that create the problem.
Paragraph Outline:
- Introduction
- Define Ozempification
- Frame question of resistance or rebellion
- Thesis
- Joan’s Attempt to Reclaim Herself
- Joan fights back against Streamberry
- Meta-narrative twist that undercuts total victory
- Ashley Too’s Escape from the Algorithm
- Ashley regains voice and control over career
- Raises question: is she still a product?
- Turkle’s Warning About the Limits of Digital Resistance
- Even our rebellion is curated, staged
- Tech systems are designed to profit from outrage and performance
- Are Joan and Ashley Truly Free?
- Streamberry continues
- Ashley now performs a new persona—still being sold
- The Platform Always Wins
- Ozempification is flexible: it absorbs critique and sells it
- Turkle: self-optimization continues under different branding
- Resistance Must Be Non-Digital
- Turkle: real escape involves stepping away from screens
- Joan and Ashley don’t fully reject the system—they tweak it
- What Would Real Resistance Look Like?
- Total rejection of metrics, brands, performative identity
- Vulnerability, slowness, non-digital community
- Conclusion
- Restate thesis
- The real threat of Ozempification is its adaptability; rebellion must be deeper than aesthetic defiance
Cinemorphosis 
Leave a comment