Essay Prompt:
In contemporary food discourse, cries of “inauthentic” are often used to police the boundaries of cultural identity. American Chinese food and modern Mexican cuisine are frequently accused of deviating from their traditional roots—dishes like General Tso’s chicken or Korean taco fusion provoke both celebration and scorn. But what does authenticity really mean in a country built on cultural convergence and adaptation?
This essay invites you to explore the tensions between authenticity and adaptation in the evolution of Mexican and Chinese food in the United States. Rather than framing culinary transformation as a betrayal, consider how these cuisines have served as vehicles for survival, cultural expression, and even quiet resistance against exclusion and erasure.
Drawing from:
- Gustavo Arellano’s essay “Let White People Appropriate Mexican Food”
- Ian Cheney’s documentary The Search for General Tso
- Charles W. Hayford’s “Who’s Afraid of Chop Suey”
- Cathy Erway’s “More Than ‘Just Takeout’”
- Kelley Kwok’s “‘Not Real Chinese’: Why American Chinese Food Deserves Our Respect”
- Jiayang Fan’s “Searching for America with General Tso”
Your task is to defend, refute, or complicate the claim that criticizing Mexican and Chinese food for being “inauthentic” oversimplifies the realities of cultural exchange, economic survival, and creative resilience. Analyze how these foods reflect the lived experiences of immigrant communities negotiating belonging in a country often hostile to their presence.
In your essay, define authenticity and explain how food operates as both cultural symbol and commodity. Should evolving cuisines be celebrated as testaments to resilience and ingenuity, or are there valid reasons to lament the loss of traditional culinary practices?
You are encouraged to include personal anecdotes, cultural observations, or family histories if relevant—but maintain an argumentative, evidence-based tone throughout.
Sample Thesis Statements
Thesis 1:
Labeling American Chinese and modern Mexican food as “inauthentic” not only ignores the histories of exclusion and survival that shaped these cuisines, but also reinforces a rigid, essentialist view of culture that fails to recognize adaptation as a legitimate—and necessary—form of expression.
Thesis 2:
While culinary purists may mourn the loss of tradition, dishes like orange chicken and carne asada fries should be understood not as betrayals of culture, but as inventive responses to racism, capitalism, and assimilation—proof that food evolves to meet the needs of those who cook it.
Thesis 3:
Though some modern interpretations of Mexican and Chinese cuisine risk diluting cultural meaning, dismissing them as inauthentic erases the labor, compromise, and strategy behind immigrant adaptation. These “inauthentic” dishes are often the only tools marginalized communities have to assert presence in the mainstream.
10-Paragraph Essay Outline
Paragraph 1 – Introduction
- Open with a vivid description of a “fusion” dish—e.g., General Tso’s chicken or a bulgogi taco.
- Introduce the cultural tension: critics call it inauthentic, but fans see it as innovative.
- Define authenticity as it relates to food—linked to heritage, but often idealized or frozen in time.
- Introduce thesis: Adapted Mexican and Chinese dishes are more than just Americanized versions—they are creative, resilient responses to exclusion, shaped by economic and social realities.
Paragraph 2 – The Myth of Culinary Purity
- Discuss how cultures, including their cuisines, are never static—food evolves across borders, time, and necessity.
- Reference Hayford’s essay: Chop Suey was mocked but also became a symbol of cultural hybridity.
- Suggest that authenticity is a moving target, not a fixed standard.
Paragraph 3 – Food as Survival Strategy
- Show how immigrant communities adapted recipes to fit American ingredients, tastes, and economic constraints.
- Use The Search for General Tso to illustrate how Chinese restaurant owners tailored menus to avoid discrimination while making a living.
- Frame these adaptations as strategic—not sellouts, but survival tools.
Paragraph 4 – Mexican Cuisine and Cultural Flexibility
- Draw from Arellano’s argument: Mexican food has always been flexible and regionally diverse.
- Discuss the rise of dishes like breakfast burritos or California burritos—not Mexican per se, but still rooted in Mexican technique and sensibility.
- Argue that innovation doesn’t erase identity—it expands it.
Paragraph 5 – Appropriation vs. Adaptation
- Make distinctions between cultural appropriation (extraction without respect) and cultural adaptation (evolution from within).
- Arellano’s essay defends white chefs cooking Mexican food, but notes the double standard when immigrants are excluded from credit or capital.
- Emphasize the importance of who benefits from culinary success.
Paragraph 6 – The Emotional Stakes of Authenticity
- Explore why food carries such emotional weight—it connects to home, family, memory.
- Reference Kelley Kwok’s essay on shame and pride in eating American Chinese food.
- Acknowledge that critiques of authenticity often come from a place of longing, but may oversimplify how identity is preserved.
Paragraph 7 – The Mainstreaming of “Ethnic” Food
- Discuss how dishes once dismissed as “ethnic junk” have become trendy and profitable.
- Use Jiayang Fan’s reflections to show how General Tso became a cultural ambassador—flawed, yes, but powerful.
- Ask: Is mainstream acceptance a win for cultural visibility, or does it flatten the story?
Paragraph 8 – Counterargument: The Loss of Tradition
- Consider critics who argue that modern adaptations erase important culinary history.
- Acknowledge the danger of cultural dilution—e.g., chain restaurants replacing traditional kitchens.
- But rebut by arguing that tradition and innovation are not mutually exclusive; both can coexist.
Paragraph 9 – Synthesis: Food as a Living Archive
- Reassert that Mexican and Chinese American dishes are not lesser—they are living archives of migration, struggle, and creativity.
- Argue that we should assess cuisine not just by fidelity to a past, but by how it reflects the realities of the present.
- Draw from Erway’s piece on how takeout often contains rich, hidden histories of resilience.
Paragraph 10 – Conclusion
- Return to your opening image: that “inauthentic” fusion dish is a cultural text worth reading.
- Reaffirm your thesis: to dismiss adapted food as inauthentic is to miss its ingenuity and the hard histories behind it.
- End with a call to rethink what authenticity means—not as static preservation, but as cultural endurance through change.
Cinemorphosis 
Leave a comment