Gods of Code: Tech Lords and the End of Free Will (College Essay Prompt)

In the HBO Max film Mountainhead and the Black Mirror episode “Joan Is Awful,” viewers are plunged into unnerving dystopias shaped not by evil governments or alien invasions, but by tech corporations whose influence surpasses state power and whose tools penetrate the most intimate corners of human consciousness.

Both works dramatize a chilling premise: that the very notion of an autonomous self is under siege. We are not simply consumers of technology but the raw material it digests, distorts, and reprocesses. In these narratives, the protagonists find their sense of self unraveled, their identities replicated, manipulated, and ultimately owned by forces they cannot control. Whether through digital doppelgängers, surveillance entertainment, or techno-induced psychosis, these stories illustrate the terrifying consequences of surrendering power to those who build technologies faster than they can understand or ethically manage them.

In this essay, write a 1,700-word argumentative exposition responding to the following claim:

In the age of runaway innovation, where the ambitions of tech elites override democratic values and psychological safeguards, the very concept of free will, informed consent, and the autonomous self is collapsing under the weight of its digital imitation.

Use Mountainhead and “Joan Is Awful” as your core texts. Analyze how each story addresses the themes of free will, consent, identity, and power. You are encouraged to engage with outside sources—philosophical, journalistic, or theoretical—that help you interrogate these themes in a broader context.

Consider addressing:

  • The illusion of choice and algorithmic determinism
  • The commodification of human identity
  • The satire of corporate terms of service and performative consent
  • The psychological toll of being digitally duplicated or manipulated
  • Whether technological “progress” is outpacing moral development

Your argument should include a strong thesis, counterargument with rebuttal, and close textual analysis that connects narrative detail to broader social and philosophical stakes.


Five Sample Thesis Statements with Mapping Components


1. The Death of the Autonomous Self

In Mountainhead and Joan Is Awful, the protagonists’ loss of agency illustrates how modern tech empires undermine the very concept of selfhood by reducing human experience to data, delegitimizing consent through obfuscation, and accelerating psychological collapse under the guise of innovation.

Mapping:

  • Reduction of human identity to data
  • Meaningless or manipulated consent
  • Psychological consequences of tech-induced identity collapse

2. Mock Consent in the Age of Surveillance Entertainment

Both narratives expose how user agreements and passive digital participation mask deeply coercive systems, revealing that what tech companies call “consent” is actually a legalized form of manipulation, moral abdication, and commercial exploitation.

Mapping:

  • Consent as coercion disguised in legal language
  • Moral abdication by tech designers and executives
  • Profiteering through exploitation of personal identity

3. From Users to Subjects: Tech’s New Authoritarianism

Mountainhead and Joan Is Awful warn that the unchecked ambitions of tech elites have birthed a new form of soft authoritarianism—where control is exerted not through force but through omnipresent surveillance, AI-driven personalization, and identity theft masquerading as entertainment.

Mapping:

  • Tech ambition and loss of oversight
  • Surveillance and algorithmic control
  • Identity theft as entertainment and profit

4. The Algorithm as God: Tech’s Unholy Ascendancy

These works portray the tech elite as digital deities who reprogram reality without ethical limits, revealing a cultural shift where the algorithm—not the soul, society, or state—determines who we are, what we do, and what versions of ourselves are publicly consumed.

Mapping:

  • Tech elites as godlike figures
  • Algorithmic reality creation
  • Destruction of authentic identity in favor of profitable versions

5. Selfhood on Lease: How Tech Undermines Freedom and Flourishing

The protagonists’ descent into confusion and submission in both Mountainhead and Joan Is Awful show that freedom and personal flourishing are now contingent upon platforms and policies controlled by distant tech overlords, whose tools amplify harm faster than they can prevent it.

Mapping:

  • Psychological dependency on digital platforms
  • Collapse of personal flourishing under tech influence
  • Lack of accountability from the tech elite

Sample Outline


I. Introduction

  • Hook: A vivid description of Joan discovering her life has become a streamable show, or the protagonist in Mountainhead questioning his own sanity.
  • Context: Rise of tech empires and their control over identity and consent.
  • Thesis: (Insert selected thesis statement)

II. The Disintegration of the Self

  • Analyze how Joan and the Mountainhead protagonist experience a crisis of identity.
  • Discuss digital duplication, surveillance, and manipulated perception.
  • Use scenes to show how each story fractures the idea of an integrated, autonomous self.

III. Consent as a Performance, Not a Principle

  • Explore how both stories critique the illusion of informed consent in the tech age.
  • Examine the use of user agreements, surveillance participation, and passive digital exposure.
  • Link to real-world examples (terms of service, data collection, facial recognition use).

IV. Tech Elites as Unaccountable Gods

  • Compare the figures or systems in charge—Streamberry in Joan Is Awful, the nebulous forces in Mountainhead.
  • Analyze how the lack of ethical oversight allows systems to spiral toward harm.
  • Use real-world examples like social media algorithms and AI misuse.

V. Counterargument and Rebuttal

  • Counterargument: Technology isn’t inherently evil—it’s how we use it.
  • Rebuttal: These works argue that the current infrastructure privileges power, speed, and profit over reflection, ethics, or restraint—and humans are no longer the ones in control.

VI. Conclusion

  • Restate thesis with higher stakes.
  • Reflect on what these narratives ask us to consider about our current digital lives.
  • Pose an open-ended question: Can we build a future where tech enhances human agency instead of annihilating it?

Comments

Leave a comment