Part of the panic surrounding retirement comes from the suspicion that you are not merely leaving your job. You are disappearing.
Consider all the colleagues you have known over the decades who retired before you. Some moved to Arizona, Oregon, or Florida. Others remained in the same Southern California houses where they had lived for thirty years. Some have died. But be honest: How often do you think about them?
Not often.
This can be unsettling because many of these people once occupied substantial real estate in your daily consciousness. You saw them in hallways. You stopped by their offices. You complained together about administrators. You sat beside them at meetings and exchanged glances when someone announced an exciting new initiative involving assessment. You knew who was getting divorced, who had bought a house, who hated the dean, who had developed sciatica, and who had recently discovered pickleball.
Then they retired.
Within a few years, they became characters from an earlier season of the show.
Before condemning yourself as shallow, consider the obvious: they probably aren’t thinking much about you either.
This is the reciprocal disappearing act of retirement. Out of sight, out of mind sounds callous, but it describes an essential economy of attention. Human beings cannot maintain equal psychological intimacy with everyone who has passed through their lives. You have to pay attention to the people standing in front of you. Your spouse. Your children. Your friends. Your current colleagues. The student sitting in your office explaining why he couldn’t submit his essay because Canvas apparently entered into a conspiracy against him.
Forgetting is not necessarily indifference. Sometimes it is efficiency.
The alternative would be madness. Imagine carrying every former colleague, neighbor, student, childhood friend, dentist, supervisor, gym acquaintance, and Trader Joe’s cashier around in your head at full emotional resolution. By sixty-five, your brain would resemble a Costco parking lot on the Saturday before Christmas.
And yet, as retirement approaches, the ego rebels against this perfectly reasonable arrangement.
Surely they won’t forget me.
After all, I have been here for decades. I have taught thousands of students. I have developed courses, served on committees, attended meetings, written reports, helped colleagues, annoyed administrators, and contributed enough institutional labor to qualify as geological activity. My departure will leave a hole.
A tremendous hole.
This is the Meteor-Crater Delusion: the belief that your departure from an institution will leave such an enormous cavity that future generations will gather around it in reverent silence and contemplate the magnitude of the object that once occupied the space.
You imagine the department staggering around after your retirement.
“How are we going to replace Jeff?”
“We can’t.”
“What will happen to freshman composition?”
“God help us.”
Perhaps the college will install a bronze plaque outside my former office. Students will make pilgrimages. Faculty will speak in hushed tones about the ancient period when McMahon still roamed the corridors, carrying his coffee and complaining about Student Learning Outcomes.
Then you retire.
Someone gets your office.
Someone gets your classes.
Someone changes the password to something.
By September, a new instructor is sitting in your chair eating a turkey sandwich.
The crater has mysteriously filled itself.
This realization can feel humiliating only if you misunderstand what a career was supposed to accomplish. The purpose was never to become irreplaceable. In fact, an institution that collapses when one sixty-five-year-old employee leaves is not an institution. It is a hostage situation.
A better metaphor is the Baton Principle.
Think of your career as one leg of a relay race. Long before you arrived, somebody else was running. That person taught the students, attended the meetings, complained about the parking, fought battles now forgotten, and eventually handed the baton forward.
Then somebody handed it to you.
You ran.
You ran for forty years.
You taught thousands of students. You read mountains of essays. You changed your courses, learned new technologies, survived new administrators, watched entire pedagogical religions rise and collapse, endured COVID, Zoom, smartphones, learning-management systems, declining reading stamina, and finally generative AI arriving at the classroom door with a flamethrower.
That’s a respectable leg of the race.
Now somebody else is waiting with an outstretched hand.
Give her the baton.
Do not clutch it to your chest screaming, “But what about my legacy?”
Your legacy is that the race continues.
This is where the Baton Principle corrects the Meteor-Crater Delusion. The immature ego wants to leave devastation behind as proof of its importance. Look at the enormous hole created by my absence! The mature person should hope for precisely the opposite. The students keep coming. The classes keep running. Younger professors bring different ideas. They discard some of yours. They preserve others without remembering where they came from. Eventually your fingerprints disappear from the institution altogether.
Good.
You did not spend forty years constructing a monument to yourself. You participated in something that existed before you and, with luck, will continue after you.
There is dignity in accepting this because it frees you from one of retirement’s most poisonous confusions: mistaking disappearance from the workplace for disappearance from life.
You are supposed to disappear from the workplace.
That’s what retirement means.
The mistake would be standing outside the college afterward, pressing your face against the glass, waiting for someone inside to notice that you are gone.
Let them forget you.
You will forget some of them too.
Pass the baton. Leave the track. Go home. Become somebody appropriate to the life you have now rather than demanding that an institution preserve the person you used to be.
The race continues.
It just no longer requires you to keep running in it.

Leave a comment